Cases

801 F.Supp. 1 (1992) Fred L. FULSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants. No. C2-91-540. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. August 26, 1992. *2 *3 Darryl A. Hines, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff. Glenn B. Redick, City Attorney's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for defen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving Doc. 35] SARA LIOI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims. The matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Robin Anderson (“Plainti

1 S.W.3d 634 (1999) Joe M. HATHAWAY, Willie M. Hathaway, and Clara B. Fulson, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. FIRST FAMILY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant/Petitioner. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. August 30, 1999. *635 Val Sanford, A. Scott Derrick, Wayne L. Robbins, Jr,. Gullett, Sandford, Robinson & Martin, PLLC, Nashville, for D

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER JOHN R. ADAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant Air Enterprises, LLC’s (“Air En*658terprises”) motion for summary, judgment on Plaintiff Gene Charles’ (“Mr, Charles”) claim of retaliation in violation of the Family and .Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). For the reasons that follow, Air Ent

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., Chief Judge. Currently pending before the court in the above-captioned case between Plaintiff Maurice S. Vaughn (“Vaughn” or “Plaintiff’) and Defendant the United States of America (the “Government” or “Defendant”) is the Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (ECF No. 18). For the following reasons, the court grants the Government’s Motion (ECF No. 18).<

751 F.2d 288 22 Ed. Law Rep. 97 Ronald R. SALINAS and Cindy Salinas, Appellants,v.The SCHOOL DISTRICT OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI; John A.Minor, Jr., Acting Superintendent of Schools; Lewis W.Clymer, Vice President; James P. Bonadonna, Treasurer;Chester Anderson, Director; Mary E. Arney, Director; JoyceStark, Director; Fletcher Daniels, Director; Sue Fulson,Director; Fred Heine, Director

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Judge John R. Adams, UNITED. STATES DISTRICT COURT Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Guardian Property Management, Inc., Noble Homes, Inc., and Dean Windham (collectively, “Noble Homes”). Doc. T12. In *570addition, Plaintiff the United- States of America has moved for parti

781 F.Supp.2d 582 (2011) Chau PAPATHEODOROU, Plaintiff v. Roger CLARK, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08 CV 2383. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 18, 2011. *583 Frank R. Ubhaus, Kara L. Erdodi, Berliner Cohen, Santa Jose, CA, for Plaintiff. Kathryn T. Joseph, David F. Aggers, Aggers, Joseph

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiffs James and Sherry Cramer (“Plaintiffs” or the “Cramers”) filed this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 against the United States of America (“the United States”). Plaintiffs assert that the United States wrongly denied their theft loss deduction for taxable year 2007. Currently pending before the court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Currently pending before the court in the above-captioned case is Defendants GC Acquisition, LLC, Glastic Corporation Supplemental Executive Plan “A”, and Rochling Glastic Composites’ (together, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff Albert Schempp’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Schempp”) Motion for Summary Judgment on a limited iss

MEMORANDUM OPINION — Xnd ORDER J. RONNIE GREER, UNITED , STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is 'before the Court on the motion of plaintiffs, Tri-Cities Holdings, *917LLC (“TCH”) and Jane Doe Nos. 1-2, and John Doe Nos. 1-6 (“individual plaintiffs”) (referred to collectively as “plaintiffs”) for summary judgment, [Doc. 67]. The defendants have respo

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiffs Thomas and Margaret Zinn (“Plaintiffs” or the “Zinns”) filed this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 against the United States of America (“United States”). Plaintiffs assert that the United States wrongly denied their theft loss deduction for taxable year 2004. Currently pending before the court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20)

SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Currently pending before the court in the within case is Defendant Air Evac *774EMS, Inc.'s ("Air Evac" or "Defendant") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47), and Plaintiff Medical Mutual of Ohio's ("MMO" or "Plaintiff") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45). Also pending is Air Evac

■ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Currently pending before the court in the above-captioned case between Plaintiff Nelida Lopez (“Lopez” or “Plaintiff’) and Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant American Family Life Insurance Company, and Defendant American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin (collectively, “American Family” or “Defendants”) i

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., Chief Judge. Currently pending in the above-captioned case is Defendant America’s Recovery Solutions, LLC’s (“ARS” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11). For the reasons stated herein, the court denies in part and grants in part Defendant’s Motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant regularly engages

MEMORANDUM OPINION SARA LIOI, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion of defendant Laborers’ Local Union No. 894 (“Local 894”) for summary judgment (Doc. No. 34), plaintiffs, Michael and Cynthia Drake, have filed a response (Doc. No. 41), and Local 894 has replied (Doc. No. 42). For the reasons that follow, Local 894’s motion is granted, in part, and this matter is remanded to state court.

FAGG, Circuit Judge. Ronald R. Salinas, joined by his wife Cindy, appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment to the school district, its superintendent, and members of its board. Salinas claims that the board denied his group access to an elementary school auditorium, sought for the purpose of showing an educational film series to the general public, in violation of first amendment speech, association,

(2008) WESTSIDE CELLULAR, INC., Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:06 CV 2231. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 7, 2008. ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., District Judge. Now pending before the court is Plaintiff Westside Cellular, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16

MEMORANDUM OPINION HONORABLE SARA LIOI, ÚNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this pharmaceutical products liability action, plaintiff Eleanor Fulgenzi (“plaintiff’ or “Fulgenzi”) alleges that she developed the severe neurological movement disorder tardive dyskinesia (“TD”) after ingesting metoclopramide. The remaining defendant, PLIVA, Inc. (“defendant” or “PLIVA”), a manufacturer of a generic version of metoclop

(2008) Bruce O. BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. WACKER SILICONE CORP., nka Wacker Chemical Corp., Defendant. Case No. 5:06CV03025. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 17, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Br