Cases

782 F.Supp.2d 868 (2011) FUJITSU LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; Belkin, Inc.; D-Link Corporation; D-Link Systems, Inc.; Netgear, Inc.; Zyxel Communications Corporation; and Zyxel Communications, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-03972-LHK. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. March 29, 2011.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff AirWair International Ltd. (“AirWair”), brings this action against defendant NPS (Shoes) Ltd. (“NPS”) and defendant Matthew K. Schultz, an individual doing business as Calceus (“Calceus”), for federal trademark infringement, federal false designation of origin, trademark dilution, California statutory unfair competition

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are the following motions: *843• Defendant Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") Rule 50(a) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages (Docket No. 1018);1 • Apple's Rule 50(a) Motion for Judgme

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Before the Court is a patent infringement action filed by MGT Gaming, Inc. (“MGT”) against the following defendants: WMS Gaming, Inc. (“WMS”) and its affiliated casino operators, Caesars Entertainment Corporation (“Caesars”) and MGM Resorts International, Inc. (“MGM”) (collectively the “WMS Defendants”); along with Aruze Gaming Ame

ORDER Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on several Motions of the parties. This patent infringement action relates to two patents—U.S. Patent Nos. 8,518,318 (“the ’318 Patent’”) and 6,547,094 (“the ’094 Patent’”), which both pertain to methods of manufacturing flexible plastic tubes and other thin-walled tubular containers. Plaintiffs Viva Healthcare Packagin

OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Componex Corporation alleges that defendant Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (“EFI”), infringes two of its patents for printing technology. The court has already addressed Componex’s infringement claims on summary judgment with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,685,076 (“the '076 patent”). (Dkt. # 152.) This opinion addresses Componex’s cla

MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH N. LaPLANTE, District Judge. When service of process absolutely, positively has to be effected on a Taiwanese defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(2)(C)(ii), is Federal Express enough? Defendants Tien-Ming Chou and Oncque Corporation, citizens of Taiwan to whom the clerk of this court sent the summons and complaint in this action via Federal Express, say

(2008) MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Apple Computer, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, and Netgear, Inc., Plaintiff v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, Defendants. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Plaintiff v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc., Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation, ASUS Computer International, D-Link Systems, Inc., Belkin Corporation, A

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. I. Introductory Statement The joinder provision of the America Invents Act (“AIA”) has had an evident impact on the procedural handling of patent infringement actions in scenarios where a plaintiff seeks to hold multiple defendants liable based on similarly designed consumer products. 35 U.S.C. § 299. To the extent joinder of

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have submitted to the court their joint Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Dkt. 157] Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“Third Complaint”) [Dkt. 154]. As grounds for dismissal Defendants argue that the Third Complaint is defective based on vague and implausible pleading whic

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Necdet Aktas and Lisa Filomia-Aktas commenced the within action against defendants alleging various claims arising out of work performed at their home on 223 Mill Creek Road in Adirondack, New York. Presently before the Court are the following motions: (1) defendant JMC Development Co., Inc. and Joseph M.

SignalQuest v . Chou, et a l . CV-11-392-JL 5/22/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SignalQuest, Inc. v. Civil N o . 11-cv-392-JL Opinion N o . 2012 DNH 090 Tien-Ming Chou and Oncque Corporation MEMORANDUM ORDER When service of process absolutely, positively has to be effected on a Taiwanese defendant pursuant to Federal