Cases

612 F.Supp.2d 694 (2009) Robert FRYE, Kathy Frye, and Kylee Rose Frye, Plaintiffs, v. BRUNSWICK COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and David Hamilton Arrowood, Defendants. No. 7:08-CV-47-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. March 9, 2009. *699 Robert Marion Tatum, Tatum Atkinson & Lively, PLLC, Rale

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge Presently before this court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Julia Ed-monds, Kaye Hunter, Brad Royal, Ellen Weston, Kara Richardson, Mary Todd Allen, Tina Ramsey, Sam Dempsey, Gretchen Troutman, Jonathan L. Garwood, Martha C. Tedrow, and Dr. Kenneth Sim-ington (the “School Defendants”)1 (Doc. 20), and a Partial

ORDER TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jones County Board of Education’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 81]. Plaintiffs filed a response on August 24, 2011 [DE 85] and Defendants replied on September 13, 2011 [DE 86]. The motion is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons listed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims ar

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Onslow County Sheriff Ed Brown (“Sheriff Brown”) appeals from orders entered on 4 November 2013 denying his motions to dismiss under Rule 12 as well as granting a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs Sandhill Amusements, LLC (“Sandhill”) and Gift Surplus, LLC (“Gift Surplus”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”).1 We agree with Sheriff Brown that

658 F.Supp.2d 713 (2009) Ophelia MUNN-GOINS, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BLADEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. No. 7.08-CV-21-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. September 17, 2009. *717 John W. Gresham, Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Gresham & Sumter, P.A., Charlotte, NC, for P

503 A.2d 233 (1986) Robert LYONS v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO. 43. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued September 13, 1985. Decided January 9, 1986. *234 Hanscom & Carey, P.A., Thomas S. Carey (orally), Rumford, for plaintiff. David W. Austin (orally), Rumford, for defendant. Bef

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Javier J. Romaguera ("Sgt. Romaguera")'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the "Motion") (D.E. 65). THE COURT has reviewed the Motion and pertinent parts of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons explained below, the Motion is granted as to the sole federal claim, and the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge This case is before the court on various post-trial motions of the parties and a proposed intervenor following a jury verdict for Plaintiffs and the court’s award of equitable relief in this action for wrongful discharge in violation of the First Aihendment under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and State law. The purpose of this memorandum opinion and order i

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. The Town of Nags Head (“Town” or “defendant”) removed this case from Superior Court of Dare County, North Carolina (“Dare County Superior Court”), based on federal question jurisdiction. The case includes five federal claims, nine state-law claims, and four state-law counterclaims. For reasons explained below, the court grants summary judgment to the Town as to four

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge This matter comes before the court on the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claims pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by Defendants The Guilford County Board of Education (“Board”) and William Charles Blanchard, in his individual and official capacities, (“Blanchard”) (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff Jacob

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. On February 26, 2014, Stephanie Yar-brough and Stephanie - Williams (“plaintiffs”) sued East Wake First Charter School a/k/a East Wake Academy (“EWA”) and Michael Lester, individually and in his official capacity as President of the EWA Board of Directors (collectively, “defendants”) [D.E. 1-2], Plaintiffs asserted fifteen claims under state and federal law. On March

390 S.E.2d 338 (1990) 326 N.C. 462 James Sidney DAVIS v. William S. HIATT, Commissioner, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles. No. 155PA89. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 5, 1990. *339 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Jane P. Gray, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., and Mabel Y. Bullock, Asst. Atty. Gen.,

JUSTICE TIMPONE delivered the opinion of the Court. **486The case before us concerns New Jersey law enforcement's use of the Alcotest 7110 MKIII-C (Alcotest) to obtain breath samples from drivers suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. The Alcotest machine analyzes breath samples, producing

GILBERT, Chief Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the majority’s sesquipedalian opinion, in which they purport to rewrite part of the Maryland Law of Contracts. If, as has been said, judicial activism is to the law what garlic is to cooking — it improves the product — then too much garlic has been added in the instant case, and instead of pot ro

ORDER ON DEFENDANT PATHEON’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Jonathan Goodman, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This litigation arose out of a Collaboration Agreement between two companies involved in the pharmaceutical business, Plaintiff Procaps S.A. (“Procaps”) and Defendant Patheon Inc. (“Patheon”). Procaps and Patheon have spent much of the past three years involved in an expensive, bitter, time-consuming, and

WAINWRIGHT, Justice. On 5 October 1996, plaintiff, W. Bruce Howerton, Jr., D.D.S. (“Howerton”), suffered a devastating motorcycle accident while riding his off-road motorcycle at a motocross practice track in western North Carolina. Howerton was an experienced off-road motorcycle enthusiast who had been riding motorcycles since he was a child. He had owned numerous motorcycles throughout his life and was knowledgeable in the

HARRELL, J. On 17 February 2006, Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”), reported a leak of approximately 26,000 gallons of gasoline from the underground tanks at its fueling station located in Jacksonville, Maryland.1 The seemingly cursed Jacksonville community, the unfortunate site of multiple gasoline leaks over the years, see, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Yarema, 69 Md.App. 124, 516 A.2

BEASLEY, Judge. T.A.S.1 appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained during a school-wide student search at the *274Brunswick County Academy (Academy) that extended from the students’ personal effects and jackets to their pockets, shoes, and socks and finally beneath the girls’ outer clothing. Following