Cases

758 F.Supp. 131 (1990) FROST BELT INTERNATIONAL RECORDING ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Tuff City Records, Plaintiff, v. COLD CHILLIN' RECORDS, "John Doe" and "Richard Doe," Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 8327 (SWK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 8, 1990. *132 Shatzkin & Reiss, New York City by Karen Shatzkin, for

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: In this employment discrimination and wrongful discharge case, defendant and former employer Thurston Foods, Inc. ("Thurston") moves the Court to dismiss three of Plaintiff Judith Dighello's claims. The Court resolves the motion herein. I. BACKGROUND The facts summarized in this Ruling are extracted from the allegations of Plaintiff's Complain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DlSTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Case No. 17-2511 (RJL) AT&T INC., et al., § Defendants. § F I L E D h/_ JUN 1 2 2018 MEMORAND_UM OPINION @9.'3§‘§ ?t?ili‘%‘l鑧l§§?'é’§ll¥l§¥a (June LZ, 2018) If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 3, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00238-CV MODIS, INC, Appellant V. NET MATRIX SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Tria

763 F.Supp.2d 997 (2010) COMPETITIVE EDGE, INC., and David M. Greenspon, Plaintiffs, v. STAPLES, INC. and Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 08 C 0956. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2010. *1002 Thomas David Rein, Marc Andrew Cavan, Thomas Frost Hankinson, Sidl

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This is an action brought by plaintiff Michael Stewart against his former employers, Everyware Global, • Inc., a Delaware corporation with its corporate headquarters in Lancaster, Ohio, and Anchor Hocking, LLC, a subsidiary of Everyware having its principal place of business in Lancaster, Ohio. The action was originally filed in the Court of Common Ple

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small wonder it had to go to trial! *164On November 20, 2017, t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 5, 2012 Session DICK BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. OF TENNESSEE v. OAK RIDGE FM, INC. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Chancery Court for Knox County No. 150482-3 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor No. E2010-01685-SC-R11-CV - Filed Janua

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed September 15, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00061-CV B. MAHLER INTERESTS, L.P., Appellant V. DMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial

HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DAVID R. FARMER, J., and J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., joined. OPINION This appeal involves claims arising from a verbal exchange at a gas station. The plaintiff customer gave cash to a clerk employed at the defendant gas station to pay for gas. A

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 50) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Konstantin Burnashov (“plaintiff’) brought this suit against defendant F/V Oceanview, Inc. (“Oceanview”) on July 19, 2011. Thereafter, Oceanview filed a third party complaint against the United States (“United States” or “the government”) pursuant to Rule 14, F

ACCEPTED 14-14-00927-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice The • Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) dismissed Gustavo E. Ducharne’s wage claim filed against his former employer, Tex-Fin, Inc., under the Texas Payday Act. Dúchame sought review of *434 this decision ,in district court. All of the parties f

235 F.Supp.2d 708 (2002) FIELDTURF, INC. and Fieldturf International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWEST RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 00-12-JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Lexington. November 21, 2002. *709 *710 *711

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 23, 2012 Session APOLLO HAIR SYSTEMS OF NASHVILLE, INC. v. MICROMODE MEDICAL LIMITED ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 041561-III Ellen H. Lyle, Chancellor No. M2011-01480-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 29, 2012 Plaintiff, a retail business specializing in ha

446 F.Supp.2d 615 (2006) Cynthia D. MARTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant. No. 5:05CV00028. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division. August 28, 2006. *616 *617 Mark B. Frost and Michael C. Ksiazek, Frost & Zeff, Philadelphia, PA, and Tim

Opinion issued March 9, 2007 Opinion issued March 9, 2007 </

372 F.Supp.2d 233 (2005) APPLERA CORPORATION and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., plaintiffs, v. MJ RESEARCH INC. and Michael and John Finney, defendants. No. 3:98CV1201(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 30, 2005. *234 Brian M. Poissant, Pennie & Edmonds, Charles W. Bradley, Jennifer Gordon, Stephen J. L

349 F.Supp.2d 338 (2004) APPLERA CORPORATION and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., plaintiffs, v. MJ RESEARCH, INC. and Michael and John Finney, defendants. No. 3:98 CV 1201 JBA. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 22, 2004. *341 Brian M. Poissant, Bruce J. Barker, Pennie & Edmonds, Charles W. Bradley, Jennife

387 F.Supp.2d 755 (2004) AQUATEX INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. TECHNICHE SOLUTIONS, Defendant. No. 3:02-0914. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 27, 2004. *756 *757 *758 Jack A. Wheat, Stites & Harbison, Louisv