Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL No. 20-35721 WILDLIFE REFUGES; THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY; DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE; D.C. No. NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY; 3:19-cv-00216- WILDERNESS WATCH; CENTER FOR JWS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION; ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE; SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1347, 22-1709 & 22-1737 DRIFTLESS AREA LAND CONSERVANCY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, and AMERICAN TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC, ITC M

351 F.Supp.2d 1232 (2005) WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCES COUNCIL, Biodiversity Associates, and Jerry Freilich, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Respondent, and Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Intervenor. No. 02-CV-155-D. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. January 7, 2005. *1233</

653 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2009) CENTRAL DELTA WATER AGENCY and South Delta Water Agency, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 1:09-CV-00861 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 8, 2009. *1071 Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Abbott & Kindermann, Sacramento, CA, f

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR : ENVIRONMENTAL : RESPONSIBILITY, et al. : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 19-3629 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 42, 45,

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ORDER H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff move for summary judgment.1 This motion is opposed and defendants and intervenor-defendants cross-move for summary judgment.2 The cross-motions are opposed.3 Oral argument was

706 F.Supp.2d 1296 (2010) MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Friends of the Everglades, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, et al., Defendants. Nos. 04-21448, 04-CV-22072, 05-CV-20663. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 14, 2010. *1297

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 68, 75, 78) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns approval by the United States Department of the Interior and its member agency the United States Bureau of Reclamation (collectively, “Federal Defendants,” “Reclamation,” or the “Bureau”) of eight (8) interim renewal cont

723 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2010) SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE and Friends of the River, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. S-06-2845 LKK/JFM. United States District Court, E.D. California. July 8, 2010. *1250 Brian Orion, Christopher Alan Sproul, Environmental Advocates, San Francisco, CA,

313 F.3d 1094 KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO; Boise County, by and through the Boise County Board of Commissioners; Valley County, by and through the Valley County Board of Commissioners; the Blueribbon Coalition, Inc.; Idaho State Snowmobile Associates, Inc.; Illinois Association of Snowmobile Clubs; the American Council of Snowmobile Associations; Little Cattle Company Limited Partnership; Highland Livestock and Land Company; Boise Cascade Corporation,

106 F.Supp.2d 1066 (2000) GREENPEACE, American Oceans Campaign, and Sierra Club, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, and William M. Daley, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Commerce, Defendants, At-Sea Processors Association, United Catcher Boats, Aleutians East Borough, and Westward Seafoods, Inc., et al., Intervenor-Defendants. No. C98-492Z. United States Di

545 F.3d 1147 (2008) NORTH IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Mary E. Peters,[*] U.S. Secretary of Transportation; United States Federal Highway Administration; Thomas J. Madison, Jr.,[**] Administrator, U.S. Federal Highway Administration; Peter Hartman,[***] Division Administrator, Idaho Division, U.S. Federal Highway Administration; Edwin B. Johns

KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Unlike my friends in the panel majority and on the district court, I am satisfied that the disputed 45-mile segment of the majestic Yadkin River belongs to the people of North Carolina. I therefore write separately in dissent. The district court and the majority — in ruling against the State of North Carolina — have erred in several respects. To start, the federal court system s

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff North Idaho Community Action Network (“NICAN”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants United States Department of Transportation (the “DOT”), Federal Highway Administration, and Idaho Transportation Department (collectively, the “Agencies”). NICAN challenges a proposed highway construction project on a portion of U.S.

56 F.Supp.2d 1106 (1999) CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER; et al., Defendants. No. CV98-6996DDP(MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 1999. *1107 *1108 *1109 Joseph W. Pannone, Kane Ballmer & Berkm

606 F.Supp. 825 (1984) NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, Bering Sea Fishermens' Association, Trustees for Alaska, the Wilderness Society, Defenders of Wildlife, National Wildlife Refuge Association, Friends of the Earth, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Donald P. HODEL, William P. Horn, Robert Jantzen, Keith Schreiner, Cook Inlet Region, Inc., Calista Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation, Malcolm Baldridge, John V. Byrne, Defendants.<

275 F.Supp.2d 1157 (2002) WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, and San Benito County Water District, Plaintiffs, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Northern California Power Association, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, et al., Defendants, Hoopa Valley Tribe, Defendant-Intervenor, Yurok Tribe, Defendant-Intervenor. N

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2