Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Friedman v. Reliant Service Group, LLC”
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Christa Robey v. SPARC Group LLC (A-50-22) (087981) Argued November 6, 2023 -- Decided March 25, 2024 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. The core issue in this appeal is whether plaintiff
In Re Reliant Energy Channelview LPpublic domain
594 F.3d 200 (2010) In re RELIANT ENERGY CHANNELVIEW LP, et al., Debtor. Kelson Channelview LLC, f/k/a Kelson Energy IV, LLC, Appellant. No. 09-2074. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued November 3, 2009. Filed: January 15, 2010. *202 Andrew K. Glenn (argued), Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman,
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Fountainhead Group, Inc. (In re Bridgeview Aerosol, LLC)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAMELA S. HOLLIS, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the court following trial on the complaint filed by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Bridgeview Aerosol, LLC (the “Committee ”) against John Romano and Linda Romano (“John,” “Linda” or the “Romanos ”) and two corporate entities controlled by them, The Fountainhead Group, Inc
Chapter 11 DECISION AFTER TRIAL 1 ROBERT E. GERBER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 452 *451Findings of Fact... 453 I. Background... 453 A. Adelphia/FPL Partnership... 453 B.
Oak Mortgage Group, Inc. Michael H. Nasserfar Michael E. Task And Tycord R. Gosnay v. Ameripro Funding, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On February 8, 2018, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Nugent entered a Memorandum and Opinion ("Opinion") confirming Debtor Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kansas, LLC's ("ABBK") plan of liquidation and overruling the objections to the plan filed by Drivetrain, LLC, as Liquidating Trustee for Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC, et al. On February 16, 2018, Drivetrain filed a notice of appeal
In re Tempnology, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION J. Michael Deasy, Bankruptcy Judge I.INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Court’s order dated October 8, 2015, approving procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of Tempnology, LLC (the “Debtor”), the Debtor conducted an auction on November 5, 2015 (the “Auction”), at which Schleicher & Stebbins Hotels, L.L.C. (“S & S”),
Otto Candies, LLC v. KPMG, LLPpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES ) MEXICAN INVESTMENTS S. DE ) R.L. DE C.V., COASTLINE ) MARITIME PTE. LTD., MARFIELD ) MARITIME INC., SHANARA ) INTERNATIONAL SA., GULF ) INVESTMENTS AND SERVICES ) LTD., BLUE MARINE ) TECHNOLOGY GROUP, BLUE ) MARINE SHIPPING II, S.A. DE C.V., ) CALVI SHIPPING C.V., OCEAN ) MEXICANA, S.A. DE C.V., HALAN
Lennon v. 56th & Park(NY) Owner, LLCpublic domain
Lennon v 56th & Park(NY) Owner, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 04972) Lennon v 56th & Park(NY) Owner, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 04972 Decided on September 15, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Dillon, J.P., J.
Jerdonek v. 41 West 72 LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Friedman, J.P. Plaintiff was injured in a fall from a scaffold while he was working in a boiler room that is a common element of the con *45 dominium apartment building at 41 West 72nd Street in Manhattan, known as the Hermitage Condominium. All members of t
In Re Tci 2 Holdings, LLCpublic domain
428 B.R. 117 (2010) In the matter of TCI 2 HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Debtors. No. 09-13654/JHW. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. April 12, 2010. *126 Michael F. Walsh, Esq., J. Philip Rosen, Esq., Ted S. Waksman, Esq., Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York, NY, for the Debtors. Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Esq., Jeffr
Carter v. Huntington Title & Escrow, LLCpublic domain
HARRELL, J. This appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City beckons us to consider whether the Maryland Insurance Administration (“MIA”) is invested with primary *609jurisdiction over claims of title insurance overcharging alleged by Appellant, Maurice Carter (“Carter”), against Appellee, Huntington T
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Coatesville Area S.D. v. Chester County Bd. of Assessment Appeals ~ Appeal of: Preserve at Milltown Lantern Owner LLCpublic domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Coatesville Area School District : : v. : No. 1313 C.D. 2022 : Argued: December 6, 2023 Chester County Board of Assessment : Appeals and Preserve at Milltown : Lantern Owner LLC : : Appeal of: Preserve at Milltown : L
United States v. All Funds on Deposit Atpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Civil Action No. 04-0798 (PLF) ) ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS) Baer & Company, Ltd., Guernsey ) Branch, account number 121128, in the ) Name of Pavlo Lazarenko et al., ) ) Defendants In Rem. ) ) OPINION This matter is before the Court on the motion of the United States for summary judgment to strike the claim of Pavel Lazarenko, also known as Pavlo Lazarenko, to the defendan
AMENDED OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on petitions for review of a series of orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) relating to the energy crisis that occurred in California in 2000 and 2001. Nearly 200 petitions for review of the various FERC orders have been filed in our Court. We consolidated these peti
Holber v. Segal (In re Segal)public domain
Opinion STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction Before the Court are two Motions wherein the Movants seek dismissal of those counts in the above adversary proceeding which are directed at them. One dismissal motion has been filed by 10 of the 15 defendants who refer to themselves collectively as the “Capital Family Defendants.” The other is brought by the remaining 5 d
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges AtLee and Friedman PUBLISHED Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia SHIYE QIU OPINION BY v. Record No. 0459-22-4 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER APRIL 18, 2023
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges AtLee and Friedman PUBLISHED Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia SHIYE QIU OPINION BY v. Record No. 0459-22-4 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER APRIL 18, 2023
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionpublic domain
THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on petitions for review of a series of orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) relating to the energy crisis that occurred in California in 2000 and 2001. Nearly 200 petitions for review of the various FERC orders have been filed in our Court. We consolidated these petitions for administrative management.