Cases

Memorandum Opinion and Order Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Plaintiff Corina Freeman alleges that Defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company discriminated against her and retaliated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.1 R. 1, Compl. Travelers has moved to dismiss Freeman’s

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 5, 2001 Session TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. KENTON FREEMAN, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 00-497-III Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor No. M2001-00657-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 28, 2002 Travelers Indemnity Company [Travelers] filed a complaint for a declarato

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. KENTON FREEMAN, ET AL. Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 00-497-III No. M2001-00657-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 26, 2001 OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR Houston M. Goddard, P.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which Herschel P. Franks an

MARC T. TREADWELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this declaratory judgment action, Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company has moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether Defendants Laura Whitaker, individually, and Laura and Jeffrey Whitaker, on behalf of their minor child (hereafter the "Whitakers" to distinguish the parents and child from the grandparents), are entitled to uninsured motorist coverage unde

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gheen and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Gheen and enters the following Opinion and Award.

Filed 4/4/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re Marriage of ROD ALAN and HUB ALAN FREEMAN. ROD ALAN FREEMAN, G064552 Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. FLIN2001192) v.

[Cite as Freeman v. Lovejoy, 2023-Ohio-503.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BRANDON FREEMAN JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. -vs-

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. |! Phillip Freeman appeals from a divorce decree entered by the Clark County Circuit Court. We affirm. I. Jurisdiction Phillip argues that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to enter the divorce decree because appellee, Mary Freeman, did not prove residency in Arkansas for the sixty days preceding the filing of her

FILED Sep 22 2020, 8:56 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

ACCEPTED 04-15-00453-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/15/2015 2:34:20 PM

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1320 ALEXIS WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE FREEMAN COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dist

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-964 BRAVON M. FREEMAN, APPELLANT, v. UNITE

Field, J. The policy insures J. J. Murray against bodily injuries “ effected through external, violent, and accidental means, within the intent and meaning of this contract and the conditions hereunto annexed,” &c. After the principal clause of the policy, five provisos and eight conditions follow. The second proviso is, “ Provided always, that this policy is issued and accepted subject to all the provisions herein containe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RUBY FREEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-3354 (BAH) RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI., Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize “[l]ib

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1368 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Freeman Whitfield, IV, also known as Mr. Furley, also known as Furl, also known as Farley, also kn

239 P.3d 557 (2010) In the Matter of the Marriage of Robin M. FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. Rob R. FREEMAN, Respondent. No. 82283-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 19, 2010. Decided September 2, 2010. *558 Patricia S. Novotny, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Margaret H. Brost,

185 F.Supp.2d 614 (2001) SUNEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Telesis Incorporated, a/k/a Telesis Corporation, Arcan, Inc., and Joseph O. Hawkins, Plaintiffs, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 6:00-1521-24. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division. December 17, 2001. *615 Greg

AFFIRM; Opinion Filed June 26, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00910-CR DONNIE BROOKS FREEMAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

743 F.Supp. 475 (1990) W.L. FREEMAN, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Randy MOWDY and the Travelers Insurance Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. E88-0115(L). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, E.D. June 13, 1990. *476 Charles C. Pierce, Decatur, Miss., for plaintiff. Clifford K. Bailey, III, Jackson, Miss., for defendants.

[Cite as State v. Freeman, 2017-Ohio-1281.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104711 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.