Cases

Case: 21-50469 Document: 00516626189 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 27, 2023

Case: 18-50610 Document: 00515371821 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 3, 2020 No. 18-50610

Case: 21-20279 Document: 00516490264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2022

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Luz Gonzalez-Bermudez (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Gonzalez”) filed this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, against her employer Abbott Laboratories PR Inc. (“Abbott” or “the Company”) and her supervisor Kim Perez1

PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: In 2015, two student groups at the University of South Carolina sought approval for a "Free Speech Event" to highlight perceived threats to free expression on college campuses. According to the groups, the event they were planning would include visual displays of material that had provoked free-speech controversies at other schools, including a swastika. T

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge, dissenting from Part 11(A)(1): The six years of debate in the Texas Legislature before voter ID passed dera-*329onstrates that it is a controversial political question. The opinions issued today demonstrate it also raises contentious legal questions. And with respect to how to assess vote denial (as opposed to vote dilution)

444 F.Supp.2d 805 (2006) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO, Defendant. No. 3:02CV7565. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. April 18, 2006. *806 Jillian S. Davis, Cleveland, OH, Thomas P. Goodwin, Toledo, OH, Jeffrey M. Gamso,

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs are two same-sex couples who seek to marry in Texas or to have their marriage in another state recognized in Texas. They sued the state defendants seeking (1) a declaration that Texas’s law denying same-sex couples the right to marry, set forth in Article I, § 32 of the Texas Constitution and, inter alia, Texas Fami

989 A.2d 795 (2010) 190 Md. App. 595 Walter Carl ABBOTT v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1900, Sept. Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 25, 2010. *799 Arthur M. Frank, Baltimore, for appellant. Jessica V. Carter (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen. on the brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

523 F.Supp.2d 476 (2007) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA v. Kathleen Babineaux BLANCO, et al. Civil Action No. 07-04090. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. October 5, 2007. *477 Katharine Murphy Schwartzmann, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, Daniel Mach, La

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2061 Doc: 79 Filed: 05/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 71 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2061 SPEECH FIRST, INC., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TIMOTHY SANDS, in his individual capacity and official capaci

2024 IL 128935 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128935) M.U., a Minor, By and Through Her Parents Kelly U. and Nick U., Appellee, v. TEAM ILLINOIS HOCKEY CLUB, INC., et al., Appellants. Op

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

LEE YEAKEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *735Before the court in the above-styled and numbered cause are Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed December 21, 2018 (Dkt. No. 8), Defendant Gregory L. Fenves' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed January 28, 2019 (Dkt. No. 20), Plaintiff's Reply in Support of

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2807 SPEECH FIRST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS L. KILLEEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2807 SPEECH FIRST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS L. KILLEEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2270 ___________________________ The School of the Ozarks, Inc., doing business as College of the Ozarks, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as P

John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge This order does not address the true facts of this case. Nor does it decide the legal merits of Plaintiffs' key claims. Instead, as with many rulings on motions to dismiss, this order merely clears away portions of the case that do not belong. As explained below, this Court grants in part, and denies in part, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [48].

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) by Plaintiff Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. (“Exodus”). (Filing No. 6.) In late 2015, Indiana Governor Mike Pence (“Governor Pence”)

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ