Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Fredricks v. Smith”
People of Michigan v. Fredricks Bernard Smithpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 27, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice 140350
Fredricks v. James Archer Smith Hospitalpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See and compare Ridgewood Properties, Inc. v. Department of Community Affairs, 562 So.2d 322 (Fla.1990); Ginsberg v. Holt, 86 So.2d 650, 651-52 (Fla.1956).
Fredricks v. Foltzpublic domain
225 Kan. 663 (1979) 594 P.2d 665 PHILLIP FREDRICKS AND JAMES L. FREDRICKS AND EUNICE FREDRICKS, HIS WIFE, Appellants, v. REX FOLTZ, JACK DAVIS, D/B/A DAVIS OIL COMPANY, AND CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Appellees. No. 49,576 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed May 5, 1979. Patrick L. Dougherty, of Ratner, Mattox, Ratner
Fredricks v. Foltzpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by The basic question here presented is whether the plaintiff in a damage action can appeal an order of the trial court dismissing the action as to one of several multiple party defendants on a motion for summary judgment, where such judgment has not completely disposed of the action and the trial court has not made the explicit determination and direction of entry of judgment under K.S.A. 1975 Supp. 60-254 (
Gaughan v. Smith (In Re Smith)public domain
342 B.R. 801 (2006) In re Fredrick Edward SMITH and Cheryl Lynn Smith, Debtors. Maureen Gaughan, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, v. Fredrick Edward Smith; Cheryl Lynn Smith, Appellees. BAP No. AZ-05-1163-SKMO. Bankruptcy No. 02-19420-GBN. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 22, 2005. Filed April 7, 200
Fredrick Smith, Jr. v. State of Mississippipublic domain
GREENLEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Frederick Smith appeals his conviction from Hinds County Circuit Court, First Judicial District, of two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. More specifically, the jury found him guilty of shooting two people. On appeal, his asserted errors are that: (1) the trial court d
United States v. Smithpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fredrick Lamar Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A cer
Smith v. Huckabeepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Kevin Smith appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. For reversal, he argues that the District Court should not have dismissed his complaint based on abstention principles or defendants’ immunity from suit. His counsel has since moved to withdraw. For the reasons discussed below, we a
State v. Smithpublic domain
278 Kan. 45 (2004) 92 P.3d 1096 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BENNY R. SMITH, Appellant. No. 87,294 Supreme Court of Kansas Opinion filed June 25, 2004. Rhonda Keylon Levinson, of Gibbens, Levinson & Levinson, of Basehor, argued the cause, and Carl F.A. Maughan, of Law Offices of Carl Fredrick Alexander Maughan, L.L.C., of W
Smith v. Nevillepublic domain
539 N.W.2d 679 (1995) Shawn Curtis SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Fredrick H. NEVILLE, Defendant and Appellee. No. 18981. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs May 24, 1995. Reassigned August 23, 1995. Decided November 15, 1995. *680 Jon J. Lafleur of Lafleur, Lafleur & Lafl
Folley v. Chambers-Smithpublic domain
[Cite as Folley v. Chambers-Smith, 2024-Ohio-2391.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DEREK OLANDIS FOLLEY Petitioner C.A. No. 24CA012077 v. ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, ORIGINAL ACTION IN DIRECTOR OF ODRC HABEAS
Rochelle Scott v. Kyle Smithpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROCHELLE SCOTT, individually, No. 23-15480 and as co-special administrator of the estate of ROY ANTHONY SCOTT; D.C. No. FREDRICK WAID, as co-special 2:20-cv-01872- administrator of the estate of ROY RFB-EJY ANTHONY SCOTT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. KYLE SMITH; THEODORE HUNTSMAN; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE D
Smith v. City of Chicagopublic domain
702 N.E.2d 274 (1998) 299 Ill. App.3d 1048 234 Ill.Dec. 108 Melba N. SMITH, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Arthur E. Smith, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, and Fed & Son Construction Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-97-2666. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.
Duncan v. Smithpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMY DUNCAN,1 § No. 610, 2018 Respondent Below, Appellant, § § Court Below—Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § PAMELA SMITH, § File No. CK17-03850 Petitioner Below, Appellee, § Petition No. 17-33357 § CINDY DUNCAN,
Fredricks v. Statepublic domain
440 So.2d 433 (1983) Michael T. FREDRICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. AQ-500. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 21, 1983. *434 Michael Allen, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty.
Smith v. Statepublic domain
OPINION A jury convicted Steven Fredrick Smith of the offense of promotion of obscene material and assessed a fine of $2,000. Appellant asserts six points of error, the first of which complains that his conviction cannot stand because the trial court declared the pertinent obscenity statutes unconstitutional and dismissed the case. Because the error alleged in the first point involves a question of jurisdiction, we remand the case for a hearing for the purpose of dete
United States v. Smithpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 19-324 (BAH) JOSEPH SMITH, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The defendant, Joseph Smith, stands charged in a 19-count indictment with child sexual abuse, production and
Smith v. Indianapolis Public Schoolspublic domain
916 F.Supp. 872 (1995) Constance E. SMITH, On Behalf of Herself and Her Minor Children, Angela Levester and Adrian Levester, Plaintiffs, v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant. No. IP95-183C B/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana Indianapolis Division. November 30, 1995. *873 Jay Andrew Harp, Indianapolis, Indiana, fo
Jaylin J Smith v. State of Indianapublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Jaylin J. Smith, FILED Dec 06 2024, 9:49 am Appellant-Defendant CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Fredrick Jerrett Smith v. the State of Texaspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00247-CR Fredrick Jerrett Smith, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 79391, THE HONORABLE DEBBIE GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Fredric