Cases

PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. WOLF, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 74 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FREDRICK LEWIS BOWMAN, ATK/A FREDERICK LEWIS BOWMAN, No. 67656 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Res

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 74 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FREDRICK LEWIS BOWMAN, ATK/A FREDERICK LEWIS BOWMAN, No. 67656 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Res

THOMPSON, C.J., concurring specially. I agree that the appellant received a fair and impartial trial. Although the trial court was active in the jury selection process by trying to eliminate repetitious questioning of jurors, the attorney for the appellant was allowed to ask questions of individual jurors. Further, my review of the record indicates that this issue was not preserved for

PREWITT, Judge. Defendant was charged with the rape of a 23 year old woman. He waived jury trial. After a trial before the circuit judge, de-fendánt was convicted and sentenced to twelve years in prison. § 559.260, RSMo 1969. On the evening of August 30, 1977, the prosecutrix was with her boyfriend in downtown Branson, Missouri, when they were approached by defendant and his two brothers. She and her boyf

DICKINSON, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Sheila Patten, who was being prepared for surgery by Kevin Berry, a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), aspirated stomach fluids into her lungs, leading to her death several weeks later. At issue in this wrongful-death suit is whether the plaintiff produced sufficient evidence that Berry breached the standard of care required of a CRNA. Because she did not,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-01441-SCT KEVIN BERRY v. ORA L. PATTEN, AS NEXT FRIEND OF BIANCA PATTEN, SHADARRYL HARDNETT AND MARIAH PATTEN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/06/2009 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. HENRY L. LACKEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETTE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: L. CARL HAGWOOD

KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. Corporate Claims Management, Inc. ("CCMI" or the "Company") brings this adversary proceeding against Michelle Shaiper ("Shaiper") and Brentwood Services Administrators, Inc. ("Brentwood") (collectively with Shaiper, the "Defendants"). In a thirteen count complaint (the "Complaint"), CCMI alleges that through use of the Company's trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information (collectively, the "Misappropriated I

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [50] and Motion to Strike Affidavit of Yaminah Berry [57]. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the M°ti°n for Summary Judgment should be denied and that the Motion to Strike Affidavit of

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge. The Berry brothers sought postconviction relief under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., and following an evidentiary hearing the court entered judgments denying relief. We affirm. The Honorable George Henry, Special Judge, presided at the evidentiary hearing and made and entered the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: “[Movants] were tried on February 21, 1978

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Fredrick J. Laurino appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his claims brought against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Mr. Laurino’s counsel also challenges Fed. R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions imposed against him as part of this appeal. 1 We affirm.

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Fredrick Graham was arrested on September 3, 2014. He sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations committed in connection with that arrest. The district court

231 Ga. 39 (1973) 200 S.E.2d 95 SMITH v. BERRY. 28088. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued July 10, 1973. Decided September 6, 1973. G. Michael Agnew, Vincent P. McCauley, for appellants. Owens, Littlejohn, Gower & Pugh, Neal B. Littlejohn, for appellee. JORDAN, Justice. This appeal arises

524 F.3d 253 (2008) SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee. Nos. 07-1416, 07-1458. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 18, 2008. Decided May 2, 2008. Christopher J. Wright argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy J. Simeone, Stephanie Weine

526 F.3d 763 (2008) COMCAST CORPORATION, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. National Cable & Telecommunications Association and Consumer Electronics Association, Intervenors. No. 07-1445. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 8, 2008. Decided May 16, 2008.

530 F.3d 984 (2008) CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al., Intervenors. Nos. 07-1475, 07-1477, 07-1480. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 8, 2008. Decided July 8, 2008. Helgi C. Walker argued the ca

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Jaylin J. Smith, FILED Dec 06 2024, 9:49 am Appellant-Defendant CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

TATEL, Circuit Judge. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits Bell Operating Companies, known as “Baby Bells,” from discriminating in favor of their affiliates in the provision of services. Responding to a complaint filed by AT & T, the Federal Communications Commission found that one of the Baby Bells, BellSouth Telecommunications, violated the act by creating a volume discount plan that, though facially neutral, f

28 F.Supp.2d 593 (1998) MONTANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Sletten Construction Company, Lehrkind's, Inc., Kalispell Area Chamber of Commerce, Montana Hospital Association, Montana Farm Bureau Federation, Montana Education Association, Plaintiffs, v. Ed ARGENBRIGHT, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Political Practices, Defendant, and I-125 Proponents' Committee, Defendant-Intervenor. Montana Mining Association, Northwest Mining A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA HERBIE FREDRICK MOORE, JR., No. 78012 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petitio