Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frederick E. Crane”
O'NEIL v. Crane Co.public domain
53 Cal.4th 335 (2012) 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 288 266 P.3d 987 BARBARA J. O'NEIL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CRANE CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S177401. Supreme Court of California. January 12, 2012. *341 Waters Kraus & Paul, Paul C. Cook, Michael B. Gurien; T
KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Presiding Judge. Plaintiff, the beneficiary of a trust, filed a lawsuit against the trust, the trustee, the trustee’s wife, and the remaining trust beneficiaries to obtain an accounting, removal of the trustee, and imposition of a constructive trust on the ground that the settlor of the trust created the trust and transferred assets to it as a result of the undue influence of the trustee and his wife (Co
Campbell v. American Crane Corp.public domain
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting. Ordinarily I would be reluctant to dissent in a diversity case, but here my reading of the record is so contrary to that of the majority that a dissent is required. It seems clear to me that Raymond Campbell fell when a lacing broke, causing him to fall to the ground, rather than simply slipping and falling off the boom while threading the crane.
D. Ryan Crane, by David F. Crane, His Next Friend v. Indiana High School Athletic Associationpublic domain
975 F.2d 1315 77 Ed. Law Rep. 722 D. Ryan CRANE, by David F. CRANE, his next friend, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-2227. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Dec. 12, 1991.Decided Sept. 23, 1992.Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied Dec. 28, 199
Crane v. Statepublic domain
685 S.E.2d 314 (2009) 300 Ga. App. 450 CRANE v. The STATE. No. A09A1156. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 23, 2009. Reconsideration Denied October 14, 2009. *315 Manning & Leipold, Calvin A. Leipold, Jr., Decatur, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., Dawn H. Taylo
Roverano, W., Aplts. v. John Cranepublic domain
[J-10A-2019 and J-10B-2019] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. WILLIAM C. ROVERANO AND : No. 26 EAP 2018 JACQUELINE ROVERANO, H/W, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Appellants : Court entered
Crane v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff was injured when, on the night of the 1977 power blackout, he fell on some irregular cobblestones on a New York City street. He brought this action against the city, for failure to keep the streets in good repair or provide adequate warnings,
Crane v. Tambourine (In Re Glenview Imports, Ltd.)public domain
27 B.R. 496 (1983) In re GLENVIEW IMPORTS, LTD., an Illinois corporation, Eugene CRANE, Predecessor Trustee of Glenview Imports, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Robert E. TAMBOURINE, Trustee; Small Business Admin.; Oak Trust & Savings Bank; Wheeling Trust & Savings Bank; and Old Orchard Bank & Trust, Defendants. Thomas E. RALEIGH, Trustee, Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, v. Robert E. TAMBOURINE and Trans-America Insurance Company, De
Roverano, W., Aplt. v. John Crane, Inc.public domain
[J-10A-2019 and J-10B-2019] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. WILLIAM C. ROVERANO AND : No. 26 EAP 2018 JACQUELINE ROVERANO, H/W, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Appellants : Court entered
United States v. Frederick Springerpublic domain
*538Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge KEENAN concurred. Judge WILKINSON wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge: This case involves the government’s efforts to civilly commit Frederick Springer under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, No. 109-248
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc.public domain
316 F.Supp.2d 603 (2004) Willard E. BARTEL and David C. Peebles, Administrators of the Estate of Rolf L. Lindstrom, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN CRANE, INC., Defendant. No. 1:98CV13222. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio. May 3, 2004. Donald A. Krispin, Jaques Admiralty, Detroit, MI, Robert E. Swickle, The Maritime Asbestosis Legal Clinic, Duane C. Marsden, Jaques Admir
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 19 2018, 8:45 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 25 2020, 9:03 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Kurt P. Kroll v. Doctor's Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Wilhelm, Frederick Deluca and Peter H. Buckpublic domain
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Doctor’s Associates, Inc. (DAI), co-owned by Peter H. Buck and Frederick DeLuca, is the national franchisor of “Subway” sandwich shops. Appellee Jeffrey Wilhelm is a “development agent” for DAI. In May 1988, Kurt P. Kroll entered into two franchise agreements with DAI, each authorizing Kroll to operate a Subway restaurant in Wisconsin. Under the agreemen
Christian v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissionerspublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Fred E. Christian (Christian) appeals pro se from the judgment granting the motion of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, et. al. (Board) for Judgment on the Pleadings, or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment and dismissing Christian’s cause of action with prejudice. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and th
State v. Christianpublic domain
354 S.W.3d 254 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Frederick CHRISTIAN, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 95955. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. December 13, 2011. *255 Andrew E. Zleit, Assistant Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO for appellant. Patrick Daugherty, Assistant Circuit At
362 S.W.3d 649 (2011) RIVERSIDE EXPORTS, INC., Appellant, v. B.R. CRANE & EQUIPMENT, LLC, Appellee. No. 14-10-00573-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). February 24, 2011. *651 James Michael Hughes, League City, for appellant. Frederick Lee Fuhr, League City, for appellee. Panel consists of Justi
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Mar 06 2020, 9:34 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Suprem
John Crane, Inc. v. Jonespublic domain
586 S.E.2d 26 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 531 JOHN CRANE, INC. v. JONES. No. A03A0301. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 2, 2003. Reconsideration Denied July 29, 2003. *28 Hawkins & Parnell, Ollie M. Harton, Atlanta, Jennifer P. Treanor, for appellant. Lane & Gossett, Roger B. Lane,
John Crane, Inc. v. Pullerpublic domain
899 A.2d 879 (2006) 169 Md. App. 1 JOHN CRANE, INC., et al. v. David PULLER, Individually, etc., et al. No. 1772, Sept. Term, 2004. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 31, 2006. *883 Michelle D. Siri (Robert T. Connor, Thomas P. Bermier, Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., on the brief),