Cases

Affirmed.

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SKELTON, Judge. Plaintiff, a former employee of the Internal Revenue Service, presents two claims to the court. The first is for back pay (from May 11, 1962 to October 14, 1962) for his removal from the IRS while serving a one year probationary period. The second claim is for an alleged unlawful discharge from his position as a GS-9 criminal investigator with

Denied.

Edwards, Senior Circuit Judge In 2006, Appellant Frederick Miller and 20 codefendants were charged in a 100-count indictment alleging a conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and phencyclidine ("PCP"). On June 19, 2006, a jury convicted Appellant of 21 counts of using a communication device to facilitate a drug-trafficking offense, acquitted him of PCP distribution and

PER CURIAM: Patrick Frederick Williams appeals his conviction and life sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute. He argues that his conviction must be reversed because the trial court erroneously admitted in evidence the hearsay statements of a confidential informant, as well as evidence of prior conviction for a similar off

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge. Because the federal government’s administrative procedures for resolving complaints of discrimination are complex and confusing, individuals sometimes file their complaints with the wrong agency. In an effort to deal with this problem, Congress adopted a savings clause: “[i]n any case in

775 F.Supp.2d 1146 (2011) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Thomas William FREDERICK, Defendant. No. CR 10-30021-RAL. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Central Division. February 9, 2011. *1148 Timothy M. Maher, U.S. Attorney's Office, Pierre, SD, for Plaintiff. Stanley E. Whiting, Whiting Law Office, Wi

Rufe, District Judge. *697Plaintiff Target Corporation initiated this civil action against Frederick Mutual Insurance Company and five other defendants1 in the Court of Common Pleas for Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Acting alone, Frederick Mutual removed the action to this Court. Target now moves to remand, arguing th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge On February 11, 2009 a jury found Fredrick Pigram guilty of shooting to death Raydale Davenport outside of a neighborhood building that was hosting a community breakfast. Mot. to Dismiss Pet., ECF No. 7,1. Pending is Pigram’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and his motion to supplement that pet

37 P.3d 908 (2001) 2001 OK CR 34 Earl Alexander FREDERICK, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-1998-293. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. November 21, 2001. Robert H. Macy, District Attorney, Oklahoma County, Sandy Elliott, Susan Caswell, Assistant District Attorneys, Oklahoma City, OK, Attorneys for the State.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION December 8, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 323642 Kent Circuit Court MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FREDERI

232 F.Supp.2d 901 (2002) Robyn FREDERICK, Plaintiff, v. William D. HENDERSON, Postmaster General of the United States, Defendant. No. 98 C 5684. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 25, 2002. *902 *903 *904

Rumsey, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Koweek, J.), rendered April 2, 2014, (1) upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and robbery in the third degree, and (2) which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: In 2009, plaintiff Marissa Williams’ two daughters were removed from her custody on an emergency basis by employees of the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (“ACS”), the city agency responsible for child welfare. In 2013, after Williams had regained custody of one daughter, that ■ daughter was again removed from h

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Appellants John Frederick Dryer, Elvin Lamont Bethea, and Edward Alvin White played professional football in the National Football League (“NFL”). They participated in a putative class-action lawsuit in which twenty-three former NFL players sued the NFL on behalf of themselves and similarly situated former players. This suit claimed that films produced b

*1580Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Glen T. Bruening, J.), entered November 7, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied in part the motion of claimants for leave to file a late claim. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Claimants appeal from an order denying those parts of their mo

Per curiam. This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Notice of Discipline filed by the State Bar alleging that J. Malik Abdullah Frederick violated Standards 4, 44, 45 and 61 and Rules 1.3,1.15 and 8.4, all of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Any single violation of any of the above-stated Standards or Rules may be punished by disbarment, the sanction recommended by the State Bar. The record reflects that Frederick, w

*1580Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Glen T. Bruening, J.), entered November 7, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied in part the motion of claimants for leave to file a late claim. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Claimants appeal from an order denying those parts of their mo

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Adrian Williams appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of a controlled substance, and two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Williams argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and his request for a complete transcript of the suppression hearing. We conclude

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Adrian Williams appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of a controlled substance, and two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Williams argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the warrantless search o