Cases

McGEE, Chief Judge. *162 I. Facts The events relevant to this appeal occurred on 28 June 2009. On that date, Roddie McKinley Lopp ("Roddie") lived with his parents, Mary Lopp and Frederick Samuel Lopp ("Frederick") (Frederick together with Roddie, "Pla

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 402 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 403 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

*1266ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND CONTINUING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Limitation Plaintiff James T. Anderson’s Motion for Limitation and Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 19). Pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30505, Plaintiff asks the Court t

Final Order and Judgment R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. This case was tried to the Court between April 30 and May 8, 2012. The Court left the record open through May 25, 2012 so that the parties could address a new regulation, scheduled to be issued by the *1137Colorado Department of Corrections (“CDOC”) shortly after the trial, that potent

Thompson, Chief Justice, dissenting. Because the 1986 amendment to the State-wide Probation Act abrogated common law tolling in significant part with regard to all felony and misdemeanor probationers, I cannot conclude that when the General Assembly removed some misdemeanor probationers in 1991 from the scope of the State-wide Probation Act,8 it intended to revive the common law of

MEMORANDUM *** Edward Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of AMR, the parent company of American Airlines, on his claims of age and race discrimination, retaliation, and negligent/intentional infliction of emotional distress under California law. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 & 1332, and we affirm. I The distri

MEMORANDUM *** Edward Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of AMR, the parent company of American Airlines, on his claims of age and race discrimination, retaliation, and negligent/intentional infliction of emotional distress under California law. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 & 1332, and we affirm. I The distri

*177 MEMORANDUM OPINION GREGORY L. TADDONIO, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE In November 2006, Bill and Ruth Anderson advanced over $7 million to Commonwealth Renewable Energy, Inc., a venture created by Bill Anderson and his colleagues, Steven Savor and Stephen Fro-bouck, to develop an ethanol production facility in Western Pennsylvania. After

945 N.E.2d 661 (2011) In re ESTATE OF Frederick M. ANDERSON, Sr., Deceased (Marion Anderson, Supervised Administrator of the Estate, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jonathan Anderson and Frederick Anderson, Jr., Respondents-Appellees.). No. 1-10-1240. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 15, 2011. *662 Francis Pat

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER TU M. PHAM, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court by order of reference is the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by plaintiffs Natasha T. Anderson and Shirelle Humphreys. (D.E.132). In its response in opposition, defendant Dillard’s, Inc. requ

705 N.W.2d 451 (2005) 14 Neb. App. 170 C. GOODRICH, INC., appellee, v. John F. "Jack" THIES, appellee, and TAS Truck Lines, Inc., appellant. No. A-04-502. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. November 8, 2005. *454 Robert J. Becker, of Stalnaker, Becker & Buresh, P.C., Omaha, for appellant. Frederi

554 N.W.2d 177 (1996) 5 Neb. App. 22 Lori S. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. Ricky D. ANDERSON, Appellee. No. A-95-371. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. October 1, 1996. *178 Frederick S. Cassman and Sandra L. Maass, of Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, Omaha, for appellant. *179

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 25, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDERICK ANDERSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 280227 Barry A. Steelman, Judge No. E2014-00661-CCA-R3-CD-FILED-JUNE 29, 2015 The Defendant, Frederick Anderson, was convicted of two counts of especially aggravated ki

300 F.3d 1232 Carl J. ISAACS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Frederick J. HEAD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 01-11915. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 6, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED John R. Martin, Martin

[Cite as Price v. Frederick C. Smith Clinic, 2010-Ohio-4551.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY THELMA PRICE, CASE NO. 9-10-13 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE FREDERICK C. SMITH OPINION CLINIC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Marion County Comm

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 314PA21 Filed 15 December 2023 PAUL STEVEN WYNN v. REX FREDERICK, in his official capacity as a magistrate, and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 596, 863 S.E.2d 790 (2021), affirming an order entered on 15 January 2020 by Judge Joh

ORDER Fourteen former employees of LaSalle Steel Company sued LaSalle and the Progressive Steelworkers of Hammond, Local 783, after losing their jobs in a labor dispute. The Union had voted to strike in May 1998 as a result of LaSalle’s proposal to introduce a new pay scale that provided lower wages to new employees. LaSalle responded to the strike by hiring replacement workers and the picket line soon began to wobble, so the Union ag

694 F.Supp.2d 324 (2010) James ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK FORD MERCURY INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 08-808-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 17, 2010. *325 Maggie Ruth Clausell, Esquire of Maggie Ruth Clausell at Law, Dover, DE, for Plaintiff. George Thomas Lees, III, Esquire of Rawle & Henderso

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 293 KA 13-00835 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER CLIFFORD C. ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (CARA A. WALDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTO

OPINION OF THE COURT Rose H. Sconiers, J. Petitioner, Elmwood-Anderson Corporation, doing business as Jimmy Mac’s, initially commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding against the above-named respondents because neither the New York State Department of Health nor the Erie County Department of Health had, as of that date, issued guidelines or rules for considering waivers under the Clean Indoor Air Act (CLA