Cases

ADJUDICATION DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge. A. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The instant adversary proceeding is an accounts receivable action instituted by the Debtor, CRL..JTVE CONSERVATION, INC. t/a G & M HYDROGROW, a landscape and excavation contractor (“the Debtor”), on April 5, 1991, against the TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, a municipality located in Delaware County, Pennsylvania (“the Defendan

SETH, Circuit Judge (reassigned for opinion to SETH, Circuit Judge, from HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge). This action was commenced by Robert J. Strawn, Jr. to vacate an injunction issued in 1965 on a consent judgment. The complaint in the original proceeding was filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission agai

785 S.W.2d 503 (1990) NATIONAL-SOUTHWIRE ALUMINUM COMPANY, Appellant, v. BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATION; Public Service Commission of Kentucky; Alcan Aluminum Corporation; Green River Electric Corporation; Meade County Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation; Henderson-Union Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation; Jackson Purchase Electric Cooperative Corporation; Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation; Willamette Industries, Inc.; Utility Ratecutters

KATZ, J. The sole issue on appeal is whether trees and wildlife, independent of whether they have economic value, fall within the term “natural resources” as it is used in General Statutes § 22a-19 (a) and (b).1 The record discloses the following undisputed facts. In July, 1991, the defendant Fairfield University (university) filed with the defendant Fairfield town plan and zoning c

786 F.2d 733 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3259, 104 Lab.Cas. P 11,797 LOCAL UNION 1392, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICALWORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Intervenor. No. 85-5221. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Feb. 13, 1986.Dec

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. Local 1392 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers petitions this Court for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board in favor of the employer, Indiana & Michigan Electric Company. 273 N.L.R.B. No. 193 (1985). In November, 1978, Local 1392 filed unfair labor practice charges against Indiana & Michigan alleging that the employer h

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel delivered the opinion of the Court : The first two assignments of error relate to the alleged non-liability of defendant. It contends that, if any right of action in fact exists, it must be against the filtration company alone asf an independent contractor. The law of independent contractor is well settled. It exists only where the contractor engages to furnish all the materials, do all t