Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 25, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0459 Lower Tribunal No. 23-3316 ________________ Amnesia International, LLC, etc., Appellant,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 12, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-53 Lower Tribunal No. 18-22242 ________________ Avant Design Group, Inc., etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

187 Cal.App.4th 337 (2010) 113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 759 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMIE D. COX et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B207285. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. August 10, 2010. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *339 Thoma

OPINION OF THE COURT Carol Berkman, J. In each of these cases the People have moved for a protec*866tive order exempting the search warrant application from discovery. They argue that disclosure would tend to reveal the identity of the confidential informants. The appellate courts of this State have not spoken on this precise issue,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JULIO ENRIQUE BENEDICTO, AKA No. 18-73237 Julio Enrique Garcia-Benedicto, Petitioner, Agency No. A021-389-277 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Orde

OPINION ON REHEARING Memorandum Opinion on Rehearing by Justice GARZA. We grant in part and deny in part the motion for rehearing filed by appellants/re-lators Shamoun & Norman, LLP, Gregory Shamoun and Brian Norman (collectively “Shamoun”), vacate and withdraw our previous memorandum opinion and judgment dated January 19, 2012, a

53 Cal.4th 622 (2012) 137 Cal. Rptr. 3d 147 269 P.3d 568 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FREDDIE FUIAVA, Defendant and Appellant. No. S055652. Supreme Court of California. February 6, 2012. *634 Michael Satris and Diana Samuelson, under appointments by the Supreme Court, fo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: __________ Filing Date: April 23, 2014 Docket No. 32,203 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GILBERT MELENDREZ, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY Freddie J. Romero, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender Allison H. Jaramillo, Assistant Appel

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 16:05:53 2014.06.23 Certiorari Denied, June 2, 2014, No. 34,688 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

475 F.Supp. 344 (1979) Horace L. PATTERSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE COMPANY, and Local 6, Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America, Defendants. No. 71 H 301. United States District Court, N. D. Indiana, South Bend Division. July 17, 1979. *345 *346

140 P.3d 44 (2005) Liz ABROMEIT, Angela Ackland, Jody Amsberry, Denise Archer, Rachel Archer, Jack Armijo, Karla Baken, Norman R. Bangeman, Brenda Banks, Gloria Barajas, Adele Barney, Albinita Barreras, Kay Bateman, Mary Blaylock, Lucia Blea (Bachicha), William Bogy, Barbara Bole, Luann Booth, Kim Buchholz, Lena Bujanda, Maria Bullock, Linda Burgdorf, Lenny Bustos, Freddie Carter, Sylvia Castillo, Phillip Cedillo, Brenda Cessar, Michelle Chorens, Lori Co

Opinion issued October 30, 2003 In The Court of Appeals For The</

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0072-07 THOMAS COLEMAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS SWISHER COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in w

El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. No obstante haber expedido el auto de revisión que radicara el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico con el propósito de que revisemos en los méritos una sentencia dictada por el Tribunal Superior de Puerto Rico, Sala de Caguas, mediante la cual se condenó al Estado a satisfacer a la parte demandante recurrida la suma de $238,371.75, nos vemos

El Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. hH El domingo 10 de junio de 1984, aproximadamente a las 11:15 A.M., Orlando Cárdenas Maxán transitaba en su ve-hículo Jeep por la carretera Núm. 1 en compañía de su es-posa Ivonne Hernández Díaz y tres (3) sobrinos menores de edad. Cárdenas Maxán discurría por el carril izquierdo en dirección de norte a sur, esto

169 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2001) Douglas McCRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-D-55-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. October 2, 2001. *1261 *1262 *1263 *1264<

TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Oportunamente, se nos solicitó la revisión de una sentencia dictada por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón, en un caso de sentencia declaratoria y deslinde. Revocamos dicha sentencia por los fundamentos que expresamos a continuación. I Una síntesis de los hechos del presente caso revelan que para el 3 de julio de 1995, José Angel Torres Rive

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL EL PUEBLO DE Apelación, PUERTO RICO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Parte Apelada Superior de Mayagüez KLAN202400632 Caso Núm.:

233 S.W.3d 13 (2007) Clarence ABRAHAM, et al., Appellants v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. No. 14-06-00419-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 28, 2007. Rehearing Overruled August 23, 2007. *16 U. Lawrence Boze, Houston, TX, and Richard P. Kinnan, Los Angeles, CA, for appellants.

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 28, 2007 Affirmed and Opinion filed June 28, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of A