Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 42 CA 16-00987 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. FRED J. NICOTERA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA EANNACE, DECEASED, PAULINE NICOTERA, GIOIA L. NICOTERA AND MARISA L. NICOTERA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, MICHAEL GARCIA AND GARCIA IN

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06

817 S.W.2d 59 (1991) Ramon GARCIA, Ramon Garcia P.C., and Texas Commerce Bancshares v. Edward and Sandra ROBINSON. No. D-0949. Supreme Court of Texas. October 16, 1991. Rehearing Overruled November 20, 1991. *60 James P. Wallace, Austin, Dana Allison Lester, Brownsville, Guy Allison, Corpus Christi, Thomas J. Sim

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES

This is an appeal from denial of relief in a habeas corpus proceeding. TEX.R.APP.P. 44. Appellant is charged with the offense of attempted capital murder. The magistrate had earlier set bond in the amount of $15,000.00. Appellant alleged in his application for habeas corpus that there was no probable cause to hold him for the offense of attempted capital murder; that there was no evidence or insufficient evidence of probable cause that an offense had been committed; that he was unable

This is an appeal from a conviction before the court of appellant, Alejandro G. Garcia, for possession of heroin, less than 28 grams (habitual). The appellant was sentenced to 50 years' confinement. We reverse and remand. The issues are 1) whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erred in considering the stipulations without first approving the appellant's waiver and consent in writing. In his initial comp

This is an appeal from a conviction before the court of appellant, Alejandro G. Garcia, for possession of heroin, 28 grams or more but less than 400 grams (habitual). The appellant was sentenced to 50 years' confinement. We reverse and remand. The issues are 1) whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erred in considering the stipulations without first approving the appellant's waiver and consent in writing.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 BILL MEIER, JUSTICE I. Introduction A jury found appellant Fred Earl Inger-son, III guilty of the offense of capital murder and assessed his punishment at life without parole in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The trial court sentenced him accordingly. In four points, Ingerson argues that the evidence

OPINION This is an original action brought by David Martinez Garcia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Preston H. Dial, Jr., Judge of the 175th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, to set aside an order reinstating Cause Number 78-CR-1183 on the court's docket; petitioner further seeks the issuance of a writ of prohibition preventing Judge Dial from proceeding to trial of petitioner in Cause Number 78-CR-1183. The record reflects that petiti

OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. Felix Michael Kubosh and Carl R. Pruett, both bail bondsmen, sued Harris County Sheriff Adrian Garcia and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, challenging the constitutionality of a statutorily-imposed fee on sureties who post bail bonds. After the trial court dismissed their original lawsuit for want of prosecution, the bondsmen initiated the bill of review proceeding from w

NUMBER 13-22-00504-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CARLOS GARCIA-CANTU, M.D., Appellant, v. AMY CHRISTINE GONZALEZ, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 389TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO

OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellant Lightsey Nathan Saul, Jr., appeals his conviction for soliciting the capi *675 tal murder of Joe Daggett, contending both that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of that crime, and that a purportedly tact

52 Cal.4th 706 (2011) 129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 617 258 P.3d 751 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RANDY EUGENE GARCIA, Defendant and Appellant. No. S045696. Supreme Court of California. August 25, 2011. *712 Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme

PD-1626-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/26/2014 2:23:06 PM Accepted 12/30/2014 9:33:23 AM In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ABEL ACOSTA

OPINION A jury found appellant guilty of felony theft. The trial court, without intervention of a jury, assessed punishment at confinement in the State Department of Corrections for a period of two years and granted appellant's motion for probation. Three to four years prior to the date of the offense charged against appellant, Mrs. Elizabeth Christopherson owned and resided in the Massey apartments in Harlingen, Cameron County. Mrs. Christopherson was of advan

OPINION ARMIJO, Judge. Fred Valdez appeals from judgment entered dismissing his complaint based on cause of action for wrongful conversion of two steers. Following trial without a jury the court made findings of fact; those material to the issue before us are as follows: “1. There are two white faced s

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 7, 2014 ROY SHOTWELL, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 5874 Weber McCraw, Judge No. W2013-01213-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 27, 2014 In 2007, a Fayette County jury found petitioner guilty of two counts of rape and one count of

Ordered that Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied. Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals, 79 N.M. 500, 445 P.2d 103, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: IT IS ORDERED that our prior panel opinion, United States v. Bolton , No. 17-60502 c/w 17-60576, 2018 WL 5303661 (5th Cir. Oct. 23, 2018), is WITHDRAWN and the following opinion is SUBSTITUTED therefor.

794 A.2d 165 (2002) 171 N.J. 419 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Luis A. CRUZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 14, 2002. Decided April 9, 2002. *166 Fred B. Last, Assistant Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Peter A. Garcia, Acting Public De