Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Frazier v. Horack”
People v. Frazierpublic domain
71 Cal.App.3d 690 (1977) 139 Cal. Rptr. 573 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ODELL FRAZIER, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 29877. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. July 13, 1977. *692 COUNSEL Paul Halvonik, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Co
E. Town Mkt., L.P. v. 550 Foods, LLCpublic domain
ELMORE, Judge. This is a landlord-tenant dispute involving two leases, a master lease ("Ground Lease") and a sublease ("Sublease"). The property at issue is a grocery store building in a retail shopping center known as East Town Market Shopping Center. Appellee East Town Market, L.P. ("East Town") owns the shopping center and is both landlord and tenant under the Ground Lease, as well as sub-landlord under the Sublease. Appellant 55
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD38581 ) DEPARIS D. TOWNSEND,
People v. Superior Courtpublic domain
49 Cal.Rptr.3d 831 (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1183 The PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent; Christopher Eugene Walker, Real Party in Interest. No. H029017. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. October 11, 2006. *834 George W. Kennedy, District Attorney, Nea
People v. Superior Court (Spielman)public domain
102 Cal.App.3d 342 (1980) 162 Cal. Rptr. 295 THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondent; JOHN MICHAEL SPIELMAN et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. 47432. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. February 21, 1980. *343 COUNSEL George De
Cramer v. Van Paryspublic domain
7 Wn. App. 584 (1972) 500 P.2d 1255 EVANGELINE H. CRAMER, Respondent, v. JOHN VAN PARYS et al., Appellants. No. 1216-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One Panel 1. September 18, 1972. Horswill, Keller, Rohrback, Waldo & Moren and Pinckney M. Rohrback, for appellants. *585<
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farrpublic domain
243 F.Supp. 957 (1965) BANCO NACIONAL de CUBA, Plaintiff, v. F. Shelton FARR, William F. Prescott, Emmet Whitlock, Lawrence H. Dixon, H. Bartow Farr, Elizabeth C. Prescott, Fabio Freyre and Helen G. Downs, co-partners doing business as Farr, Whitlock & Co., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. COMPANIA AZUCARERA VERTIENTES-CAMAGUEY de CUBA and Lehman Brothers, Third-Party Defendants. United States Dist