Cases

Newman, J. Process fair and regular on its face protects the officer who serves it. The converse also is true. Process which is not fair and regular upon its face does not protect the officer who serves it. To be fair and regular upon its face, process must at least contain in some form, however informal and abbreviated, substantially an accusation of a criminal offense. It must state an offense at least colorably, or it is void.

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge. Plaintiffs are eleven current or former female employees of Defendants Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants,” “Forest” or “the Company”). In their Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”), Plaintiffs allege primarily that Defendants discriminated against female employees with respect to pay an

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) commenced this action alleging that North Memorial Heath Care (North Memorial) violated 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), Title VII's provision prohibiting unlawful retaliation, because the effect of withdrawing a conditional offer of employment was to "deprive [Emily] Sure-Ondara of equal employment opportunities ... as a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 152], Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony [Doc. No. 158], and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability [Doc. No. 165]. For the reasons set forth herein, the motions are denied. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND</

177 A.D.2d 24 (1992) Bernard McCummings, Respondent, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. February 20, 1992 Joel A. Brenner of counsel (Jonathan Cory Scott with him on the brief; David Breitbart, attorney), for respondent. Lawrence Heisler of counsel (An

121 S.W.3d 220 (2003) Larry HAMPTON, Respondent, v. BIG BOY STEEL ERECTION, Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer, Treasurer Of The State Of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party. No. SC 85456. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 9, 2003. *221 Bradley L. McChesney, St.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kristina Rapuano et al. v. Civil No. 18-cv-1070-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 013 Trustees of Dartmouth College O R D E R Plaintiffs Kristina Rapuano, Vassiki Chauhan, Sasha Brietzke, Annemarie Brown, Andrea Courtney, Marissa Evans, Jane Doe, Jane Doe 2, and Jane Doe 3 bring this suit on th

609 A.2d 704 (1992) ESTATE of Jules L. VOIGNIER. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued March 17, 1992. Decided June 2, 1992. *705 Peter L. Murray (orally) and Judith M. Peters, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, for appellant. Edwin A. Heisler (orally), Richardson & Troubh, Portland, and Paul L. Beach (orally), Kimmel &am;

MIKVA, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part: I join in most of the majority’s conclusions about this massive and historic order. Unfortunately, even in the many instances in which I share the majority’s judgments, I remain wary of endorsing the totality of its exposition and analysis, and therefore I concur in the results only. Certainly a cas

992 F.Supp. 604 (1998) Nashawin BOLTON, Jerome Waldo, and Dwight Clark, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Glenn GOORD, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Philip Coombe and John P. Keane, Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Defendants. No. 95CV3768 (SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 23, 1

428 P.2d 61 (1967) Rowan G. RICHERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The STATE of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent. No. 9751. Supreme Court of Idaho. April 21, 1967. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1967. William J. Brauner, Caldwell, for appellant. Allan G. Shepard, Atty. Gen., and David A. Frazier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondent. McFADDEN, Jus

397 So.2d 475 (1981) Sidney BAZLEY v. Sordo TORTORICH, Aetna Life and Casualty Co., and Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies. No. 67318. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 26, 1981. *478 Melvin W. Mathes, Beard, Blue, Schmitt, Mathes, Koch & Williams, New Orleans, for defendant-applicant. Steven M. Koenig, Heisler, Wys

398 F.Supp. 425 (1975) William Norman RICHARDSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND. Civ. A. No. 20868. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 7, 1975. *426 *427 William Norman Richardson, pro se. Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., and Harry A. E. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Md., for re

824 F.2d 981 263 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 83 P.U.R.4th 459 ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., et al., Algonquin GasTransmission Company, Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company,American Bakers Association, American Gas Association,American Public Gas Association, American Paper Institute,Inc., Arkla, Inc., Amoco Pr

Gordon, Jr., P. J., This action of quo warranto is brought upon the relation of William Reinhardt to determine his right to the office of member of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, heretofore held, and still claimed, by defendant Randall. Under the Housing Authorities Law of May 28, 1937, P. L. 955, sec. 5(6), the authority consists of five members, of whom “in cities of the first class the mayor shall appoint two members, the

The traverser, Clayton Yarger, was indicted and convicted for the violation of chapter 349 of the Acts of 1937, which provided for the licensing of persons selling solid fuel in the State of Maryland, and for the regulation of transportation and sale of such fuel and of other related matters; and for fine and imprisonment for those who violate the commands of the statute. The appeal is from the judgment of the court in imposing the sentence; and brings here for review the constitutionality of

SibbeckbR,- J. This appeal presents the question whether the defendant Clarke, as a justice of the peace in the city of Milwaukee, had jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine the charge preferred against the plaintiff for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed within the county but outside of the limits of the city of Milwaukee. In Gilowsky v. Connolly, 55 Wis. 445, 13 N. W. 444, it was held that,

Respondent instituted this action to secure a reduction of taxes upon certain mining claims owned by him, located in Ferry county, alleging in his complaint that, for the year 1923, if assessed according to the provisions of ch. 124, Laws of 1921, p. 401, the assessed value of the properties would have been $3,135 only; while the county officials, in defiance of the act of 1921, had arbitrarily, fraudulently and against his protest, fixed the assessed valuation at the sum of $15,000. A tender

BaedeeN, J. It was conceded on the argument that the defendant, as judge of the municipal court of Douglas county, had no legal right to pronounce judgment against the plaintiff at the time and in the manner set forth in the complaint. Ch. 278, Laws of 1895, invests said judge with jurisdiction “to hear, try and determine all criminal actions arising in said county, not punishable in state prison,” and “to hold to bail all perso

Me. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the Court. The questions for decision are whether the Unemployment Compensation Act of Alabama infringes the due *505process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and whether it is invalid because its enactment was coerced by the action of the Federal government in adopting the Social Secur