Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frazer v. United States”
Frazer v. United Statespublic domain
*735ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WIESE, Judge. I Plaintiffs are former shareholders and directors of Superior Federal Savings Bank, a now-defunct thrift institution. Their suit, a shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of the bank, alleges the breach of a government-sponsored supervisory-merger agreement as
United States v. Darryl Frazerpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-4179 Doc: 51 Filed: 04/09/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4179 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DARRYL COLTON FRAZER, Defendant – App
Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United Statespublic domain
BEEZER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the judgment of the court. If Frazer’s appointed trial attorney threatened to render ineffective assistance of counsel in the event that Frazer did not plead guilty, then I would presume prejudice. If prejudice is presumed then there is no need to determine whether the attorney’s conduct affected the trial’s outcome. Frazer pleads such a case
frazer/exton Development, L.P. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1081L (Filed: February 8, 2019) ************************************* WHITELAND HOLDINGS, L.P. and * FRAZER/EXTON DEVELOPMENT, * L.P., * RCFC 12(b)(1); Takings Clause of the *
United States v. Frazer, Davidpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-4351 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID FRAZER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.
United States v. David Frazerpublic domain
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. This case concerns an upward adjustment under the federal sentencing guidelines that is unaffected by the uncertainty created in the wake of Blakely v. Washington, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 375 F.3d 508 (7th Cir.2004), cert. granted ,
United States v. Frazer Scott Piccolopublic domain
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Appellant Frazer Scott Piccolo appeals the district court’s determination that his conviction for walkaway escape from a halfway house is a “crime of violence” under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.1 and that he is accordingly a “career offender” under that provision. Because we hold that the distric
Frazer v. Drummond (In Re Frazer)public domain
377 B.R. 621 (2007) In re Dan J. FRAZER and Sandra J. Frazer, Debtors. Dan J. Frazer; Sandra J. Frazer, Appellants, v. Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee; Cheryl L. Britton, Appellees. BAP No. MT-06-1442-SPK, Bankruptcy No. 06-60704-13. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 27, 2007. Filed September 27,
Frazer v. Property Owners Ass'n (In Re Frazer)public domain
466 B.R. 107 (2012) In re Bryan and Trenell FRAZER, Debtors. Bryan and Trenell Frazer, Plaintiffs v. Property Owners Association of Canyon Village at Cypress Springs, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 11-36667. Adversary No. 11-03484. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 5, 2012. *108 Reese W. Baker, Re
Frazer v. United Statespublic domain
MollisoN, Judge: The merchandise the subject of these protests has been denominated by counsel for the parties as well as the witnesses who testified at the trial as “shutters.” The shutters may be described as consisting of wooden frames approximately three-fourths of 1 to 1 inch thick and in sizes varying from 6 inches wide, by 20 inches long, to 16 inches wide and 80 inches long. In the center of each frame, there are wooden lo
United States v. Frazerpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion September 7, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 93-1110 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
Frazer v. Californiapublic domain
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
Frazer v. Californiapublic domain
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
Willie Earl Frazer v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant Willie Earl Frazer, a prisoner at the federal penitentiary at Steilacoom, Washington, was convicted on *2 April 20, 1954 of unlawfully concealing, selling and conspiring to conceal and sell narcotics. No appeal from said conviction was taken. On July 21, 1954 Frazer filed a petitio
Frazer v. Californiapublic domain
*1284529 U. S. 1108; 529 U.S. 1109; 529 U. S. 1111; 528 U. S. 1170; 529 U. S. 1072; 529 U.S. 1073; 529 U. S. 1090; 529 U. S. 1114; *1285No. 99-8526. No. 99-85
Frazer v. Californiapublic domain
*1284529 U. S. 1108; 529 U.S. 1109; 529 U. S. 1111; 528 U. S. 1170; 529 U. S. 1072; 529 U.S. 1073; 529 U. S. 1090; 529 U. S. 1114; *1285No. 99-8526. No. 99-85
Frazer v. Millingtonpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
Gabor v. Frazerpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Frazer v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
277 F.Supp.2d 714 (2003) Christine D. FRAZER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 00-10287-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. July 15, 2003. Lewis M. Seward, Seward, Tally, Bay City, MI, for plaintiff. Sheila H. Gaskell, United States Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for defendant. OPINION AN
Frazer v. Brownpublic domain
FARLEY, Judge: This is an appeal from a March 15, 1991, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which denied entitlement to service connection on a secondary basis for a left leg disability, a left hip disorder, and a low back disorder; and which denied an increased evaluation for, and an effective date earlier than December 12, 1985, for, removal of semilunar cartilage of the left knee, currently evaluated