Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Franklin Woody, Jr.”
Columbus Consolidated Government v. Woodypublic domain
Bethel, Judge. The Columbus Consolidated Government (“Columbus”) appeals from the denial of its motion for judgment on the pleadings. Columbus asserts that sovereign immunity bars the claims of Franklin *234Woody because the injuries he sustained while welding a garbage truck belonging to Columbus as part of a prison work detail did not arise from the negligent use of
Woody v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSIAH WOODY, § § No. 543, 2018 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID N
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00085-CV City of San Antonio, Acting By and Through the San Antonio Water System, Appellant <
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00085-CV City of San Antonio, Acting By and Through the San Antonio Water System, Appellant v. Lower Colorado River Authority; Rebecca A. Klein; Michael G. McHenry; Linda C. Raun; Tom Martine; Steve K. Balas; Lori A. Berger; Ida A. Carter; John C. Dickerson, III; Vernon E. “Buddy” Schrader; W.F. “Woody” McCasland
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00085-CV City of San Antonio, Acting By and Through the San Antonio Water System, Appellant <
State ex rel. Burrell Center, Inc. v. Franklinpublic domain
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION MAUS, Judge. This proceeding in prohibition had its genesis in the criminal prosecution State v. Butts, CR490-137FX pending in the Circuit Court of Dallas County. Defendant Butts is charged with forcible rape of H.R., in *907violation of § 566.030. Defendant Butts issued a Notarial Subpoena Duces Tecum to Relator,
State v. Woodypublic domain
157 S.E.2d 108 (1967) 271 N.C. 544 STATE of North Carolina v. Franklin D. WOODY. No. 167. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 11, 1967. *109 Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, Asst. Attys. Gen. George A. Goodwyn and Millard R. Rich, Jr., for the State. J. A. West, Shelby, for defendant appellant.
Woody v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.public domain
463 F.Supp. 817 (1978) Herbert W. WOODY, Jr. et ux., Thomas N. Allmon et ux., Jay Fred Campbell et ux., Robert R. Lowe et ux., J. B. Price et ux., Theodore L. Laws et ux., Charles L. Stephens et ux., Billy Jack Barlow et ux., Edgar Leon Poteet et ux., Lawrence Junior Hatfield et ux., Claude J. Hansard, Larry Allen Potts et ux., James A. Young et ux., Carson B. Keen et ux., Louis Dale Starnes et ux., Earl William Casey et ux., Lloyd W. Bawgus et ux., Don
Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. v. United Statespublic domain
Contract; Trial; Mail Box Rule. OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case presents a dispute between Woodies Holdings, LLC (“Woodies” or “plaintiff’) and the United States, acting through the General Service Administration (“GSA”), about whether GSA is obligated by the terms of the lease to reimburse Woodies for a portion of real estate tax
Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. The dispute in this case arises from the real estate tax provision of a commercial lease between the United States of America and Woodies Holdings, LLC (“Woodies” or “plaintiff’). As lessee, the United States, acting through the General Service Administration (“GSA”), was obligated to reimburse plaintiff, as lessor, for local real e
Woody v. Barnettpublic domain
68 S.E.2d 810 (1952) 235 N.C. 73 WOODY et al. v. BARNETT et al. No. 738. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 1, 1952. *812 R. B. Dawes, Thomas B. Woody, Jr., R. P. Burns, Roxboro, and R. P. Reade, Durham, for petitioners-appellants. Gaither M. Beam, Louisburg, and Davis & Davis, Roxboro, f
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
State v. $144,320.00 U.S. Currencypublic domain
29 So.3d 1266 (2010) STATE of Louisiana v. $144,320.00 U.S. CURRENCY, Tina M. Beers, 132 Woody Land, Siler City, NC 27344. No. 09-954. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 3, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 10, 2010. J. Phil Haney, District AttorneySixteenth Judicial District, Walter J. Senette, Jr.Assistant District Attorney, Frankl
Couch v. Woody Anderson Ford, Inc.public domain
558 So.2d 888 (1989) Terry COUCH v. WOODY ANDERSON FORD, INC., and Ford Motor Company, Inc. 88-1392. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 15, 1989. Rehearing Denied February 9, 1990. *889 G. John Dezenberg, Jr. of Higgs & Conchin, Huntsville, for appellant. Stuart M. Maples of Bradley, Arant, Rose &
Shelter Mutual Insurance v. Gardnerpublic domain
872 F.Supp. 622 (1995) SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff v. Bill J. GARDNER, Janet F. Gardner, Raymond Beans, Amy Beans, William N. Aitken, Ada S. Aitken, Don Toepfer, and Shores Hardware and Propane Gas, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 94-5114. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. January 6, 1995. *6
Jahn v. Wilson Freight Lines, Inc.public domain
793 F.Supp. 1083 (1992) Tari Hasty JAHN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILSON FREIGHT LINES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-343-1-MAC (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. June 16, 1992. *1084 Joseph H. Chambless; Joseph Edward Williams, Jr., Macon, Ga.; Virginia M. Buchanan, Robert J. Mayes, Fredric G. Lev
Fred Sanford Spicer, Jr. v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-DP-02281-SCT FRED SANFORD SPICER, JR. a/k/a FREDDIE SPICER, JR. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/1/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DALE HARKEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: GEORGE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ANDRE DE GRUY SIDNEY AM
Ex Parte Kellerpublic domain
595 S.W.2d 531 (1980) Ex parte Shirley Ann KELLER. Ex parte Jack Gordon FRANKLIN. Nos. 62936, 62937. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2. February 6, 1980. Clyde W. Woody, Houston, for Keller. Robert W. Tarrant, Houston, for Franklin. John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Alvin M. Titus and W. Paul Mewis, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash
Harris v. Standardized Sanitation Systems, Inc.public domain
658 F.Supp. 438 (1987) Rothie Louise HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. STANDARDIZED SANITATION SYSTEMS, INC., A Corporation; Pacific Floor Machine Manufacturing Company, A Corporation; and Howell Electric Motors, A Corporation, Defendants. Nancy Michelle McFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. STANDARDIZED SANITATION SYSTEMS, INC., A Corporation; Pacific Floor Machine Manufacturing Company, A Corporation; and Howell Electric Motors, A Corporation, Defendants.
United States v. Durwood Walker Woosley, A/K/A Woodypublic domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Durwood Walker Woosley appeals from his conviction of causing the transportation of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) (1982) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(b) (1982). For reversal, Woosley argues that the District Court 1 improperly refused to ad