Cases

634 F.Supp.2d 490 (2007) FREEDOM MEDICAL INC. v. Thomas R. GILLESPIE, III, et al. Civil Action No. 06-3195. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 29, 2007. *495 Edward T. Kang, Oliver D. Griffin, Melissa A. Lebon, Weir & Partners LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Gregory H. Mathews, Law Offices of Gregory Mathews, West

889 F.Supp. 5 (1995) Lloyd GILLESPIE, Plaintiffs, v. Frank H. McCOURT, Jr., and The McCourt Company, Inc., Defendants, v. BANK OF BOSTON and Fleet National Bank, Trustees. No. 94 Civ. 11648(MEL). United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 14, 1995. *6 L. Seth Stadfeld, Brown & Stadfeld, Boston, MA, for plai

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4146 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DARRELL E. GILLESPIE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (2:13-cr-00091-4) Argued:

TELSEY, P.J. Cr. This case involves an issue of first impression in New Jersey respecting the rights under the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution of a sender of a letter mailed to an inmate of a state correctional facility. On February 9, 1987, a sergeant of the Department of Corrections at Bordentown Correctional Facility opened an envelope addressed to inmate Gregg Ramos that

[Cite as State v. Gillespie, 2017-Ohio-6936.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PAULDING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 11-16-07 v. BRADLEY R. GILLESPIE, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Paulding County Common Pleas Court

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4146 Doc: 29 Filed: 03/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 18 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4146 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DARRELL E. GILLESPIE, Defendant - Appellant.

41 Mich. App. 748 (1972) 201 N.W.2d 104 PEOPLE v. GILLESPIE. Docket No. 10094. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 24, 1972. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the p

42 Mich. App. 679 (1972) 202 N.W.2d 552 PEOPLE v. GILLESPIE. Docket No. 10467. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 26, 1972. *680 Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Paul M. Ladas, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard J. Farabaugh, A

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. In May 2011, the Wisconsin Legislature passed 2011 Wisconsin Act 23 (“Act 23”), which requires Wisconsin residents to present a document including photo identification (“photo ID”) in order to vote. 2011 Wis. Sess. Laws 104 (codified as amended in scattered sections of Wis. Stat. Ch. 5 and 6).1 The plaintiffs in the two

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1043 Doc: 80 Filed: 03/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 25 Certiorari granted by Supreme Court, June 20, 2023 Vacated and remanded by Supreme Court, June 20, 2023 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

2022 WI 56 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP942-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, v. Robert Daris Spencer, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

A judge in active service requested a vote on the question whether to rehear this appeal en banc. Chief Judge WOOD and Judges POSNER, ROVNER, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON voted in favor of rehearing en banc. The proposal to rehear this case en banc therefore fails by an equally divided court. This order does not affect the ability of any party to seek rehearing by the panel or the full court, s

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1043 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC; JULIE EDWARDS, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. ROBERT M. KERR, in his official capacity as Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services,

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1043 Doc: 80 Filed: 03/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 25 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1043 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC; JULIE EDWARDS, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs – A

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This case concerns the decision of a zoning board to grant a special-use exception, thereby allowing a homeowner to rent two rooms and serve one meal to guests. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. Erin and Chase Moseley own a home on East Scenic Drive in Pass Christian, Mississippi. This home is located in the district classified as R-O, a residential distr

Opinion issued March 6, 2014. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00701-CV ——————————— WILLIAM FRANK DAVIS, Appellant V. CAROLINA DAVIS, Appell

PER CURIAM. Certiorari quashed.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. By virtue of 1996 amendments to the Gun Control Act of 1968 which prohibit persons convicted of domestic violence offenses from possessing firearms in or affecting commerce, Jerald Gillespie can no longer carry a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). As a result, he has lost his job as a police officer. Gillespie filed suit against the City of Indianapolis1

OPINION Frank G. Clement, Jr., P.J., M.S., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Andy D. Bennett and Richard H. Dinkins, JJ., joined. In this divorce action, the wife appeals, contending the trial court erred in calculating her child support obligation by failing to impute income to the husband and

*1062 POSNER, Chief Judge. A class consisting of mentally retarded citizens of Illinois who reside in nursing homes sued the state agencies that are responsible for their care. Filed in 1988, the suit complained that the state had violated the federal constitutional and statutory rights of the class me