Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frank Joseph Castro”
In Re Castro Enterprises, Inc.public domain
Case Number: 08-09-00260-CV 05/04/2010 Case stored in record room 03/12/2010 Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed proceeding denied 02/23/2010 Reply to petition for writ of mandamus 02/19/2010 Phone call from Clerk's Office 02/17/2010 Phone call from Clerk's Office 02/16/2010 response to petition for writ of mandamus 01/14/2010 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply 12/30/2009 Amended pet mand filed 12/29/2009 Case forwarded to Court 12/29/2009 Phone call fro
Castro v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The presently incarcerated Petitioner Ledwin Castro (the “Petitioner”) brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. For the reasons that follow, the petition is denied. I. BACKGROUND
Louis Joseph Benevento v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 5, 2022 No. 04-21-00483-CR Louis Joseph BENEVENTO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th J
Louis Joseph Benevento v. the State of Texaspublic domain
FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 13, 2022 No. 04-21-00483-CR Louis Joseph BENEVENTO, Appellant v.
United States v. Joseph Cammaratapublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 23-2110 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH CAMMARATA, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
United States v. Joseph Cammaratapublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 23-2110 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH CAMMARATA, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Castro v. Goemaerepublic domain
53 Mich. App. 78 (1974) 218 N.W.2d 395 CASTRO v. GOEMAERE Docket No. 16547. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided April 30, 1974. Wilson, Portnoy, Basso, Keller & Avadenka, for plaintiff. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Joseph B. Bilitzke and Carl K. Carlse
Louis Joseph Benevento v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00483-CR Louis Joseph BENEVENTO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
United States v. De Castro Fontpublic domain
593 F.Supp.2d 393 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge DE CASTRO FONT [1], Defendant. Criminal No. 08-337 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 15, 2009. *394 Lydia Lizarribar-Buxo, Lizarribar Masini Law Office, Joseph A. Eloucher-Martinez, San Juan, PR, for Dependant. Juan A. Marques
in Re Joseph Vansach Jrpublic domain
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re ESTATE OF JOSEPH VANSACH, JR. JOSEPH VANSACH JR., FOR PUBLICATION May 22, 2018 Petitioner-Appellee, 9:00 a.m. v No. 334732 St. Cl
in Re Joseph Vansach Jrpublic domain
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re ESTATE OF JOSEPH VANSACH, JR. JOSEPH VANSACH JR., FOR PUBLICATION May 22, 2018 Petitioner-Appellee, 9:00 a.m. v No. 334732 St. Cl
United States v. Frankpublic domain
599 F.3d 1221 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kent FRANK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-13685. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 15, 2010. *1226 Michael Dennis Walsh, Law Offices of Michael Walsh, P.A., Miami, FL, for Frank. Emily M. Smachetti, Anne R. Schultz, Asst. U.S. Atty.,
United States ex rel. Castro v. LaValleepublic domain
MANSFIELD, District Judge. On the hot summer evening of August 23, 1959, teenage gang warfare broke out in New York City’s lower East Side, resulting in the homicide by shooting of one Theresa Gee and several felonious assaults, including the stabbing of one Julio Rosario in Forsyth Park. A group of youthful suspects were rounded up by New York City police and held in the second floor squad room of the 9th Precinct, East 5th
People v. Castropublic domain
190 Ill. App.3d 227 (1989) 546 N.E.2d 662 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALFREDO CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-87-3360. Illinois Appellate Court First District (6th Division). Opinion filed October 27, 1989. *228 *229 Julius Lucius Ec
Rogers v. Frankpublic domain
*92MEMORANDUM OPINION GUNN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits after a one-day trial before the Court sitting without a jury. This Court having considered the pleadings, the testimony and exhibits introduced at trial and the applicable law, hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, as req
State v. Castropublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 85696, Frank H. Roberts, Jr., J., entered June 15, 1978. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per James, J., concurred in by Swanson, A.C.J., and Andersen, J.
MacHado v. Frankpublic domain
767 F.Supp. 416 (1991) Jose R. MACHADO v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, et al. Civ. A. No. 89-0170 P. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. June 4, 1991. *417 Sandra A. Blanding, Warwick, R.I., for plaintiff. Everett C. Sammartino, Asst. U.S. Atty., Providence, R.I., Nancy F. Janes, Office of Field Legal S
ELY, Circuit Judge: Appellants Dunn, Mandeville, Zeligs, Milligan, Shinafelt, and others not parties to this appeal, were indicted on four counts of conspiracy and attempt in respect to possession, importation, and intended distribution of hashish, violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952, 960 and 963. Following a three-week trial and almost two weeks of deliberation, the
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Williams Staffing, LLCpublic domain
149 F.Supp.2d 398 (2001) LABOR READY, INC., a Washington corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Labor Ready Midwest, Inc., a Washington corporation Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAMS STAFFING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, d/b/a Staffing Network, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Antwan K. Patton, John Nargan, Ray Castro, Frank McCumber, and James Schlicker, Defendants. No. 00 C 470. United S
United States v. Patrick Arthur Castro, United States of America v. Herbert Thomas Cotterpublic domain
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: After a ten-week jury trial, Patrick Arthur Castro and Herbert Thomas Cotter were each convicted of one count of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; seventeen counts of misapplication of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656; and five counts of causing false entries to be made in bank records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005. Cott