Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This matter is presently before the court on two motions — defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s objections to and motion for review (doc. # 377) of Magistrate Judge O’Hara’s February 27, 2001 order in which Judge O’Hara ruled on defendants’ motion to strike allegedly privileged or otherwise protected documents from plaintiffs trial exhibit list and plain

395 Pa. Superior Ct. 412 (1990) 577 A.2d 609 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. John K. FRANK, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 22, 1990. Filed July 6, 1990. *416 Glenn D. McGogney, Allentown, for appellant. John T. Robinson, Dist. Atty., Selinsgrove, for Com., appellee. Befo

873 F.Supp. 106 (1994) Frank DiBENEDETTO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation; Vincent Cullotta, individually and as agent of the City of Chicago; Village of Schaumburg, a municipal corporation; and Gina Ohanessian individually and as agent of the City of Chicago, Defendants. No. 94 C 1854. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. Decemb

875 F.Supp. 966 (1994) FRANK BRUNCKHORST CO. et ano., Plaintiffs, v. G. HEILEMAN BREWING CO., INC. et ano., Defendants. No. CV-94-3700 (CPS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 22, 1994. *967 *968 *969 *970</

626 P.2d 877 (1981) 290 Or. 771 Peter B. CRANDALL and Cora D. Crandall, Appellants-Respondents, v. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF OREGON, James E. Sexson, Director, Respondent, Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, and Medford Irrigation District, Respondents-Petitioners. CA 12089; SC 27034. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted

809 P.2d 121 (1991) 106 Or.App. 538 Lourdes PETTY, Respondent, v. ROGUE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a Federally Chartered Credit Union, and Charles Baggett, Aka Chuck Baggett, Appellants. 87-672-J-3; CA A61269. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1990. Decided April 10, 1991. Reconsiderations Denied May 15,

ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36

696 F.Supp. 1222 (1988) Leonard LeROSE, Jr., as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Terrance A. Hogan, deceased, and Sharon Hogan, individually and as the mother and next friend of Terrance A. Hogan, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ZION/POLICE DEPARTMENT, an Illinois Municipal Corporation; Zion-Benton Township Board of Education, a local public entity, and Don Williamson, as agent/employee of the City of Zion/Police Department and/or as a

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstJose Andujar, Defendant-Appellant. Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Frank P. Nervo, J., on dismissal motion; Anthony J. Ferrara J., at trial and sentence), rendered October 26, 2011, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of four counts of unlicensed general vending.

771 P.2d 629 (1989) 95 Or.App. 598 JACKSON COUNTY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Respondent, v. URBAN PLANNING, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Alvin Zelver, and C.M. Oregon Corporation, an Oregon Corporation, Appellants, and J. Frank Spierings, Calvin A. Lanfear, Sr., Doing Business As Lanfear Construction, and Batzer Construction, Inc., Defendants, and Rogue Aggregates, Inc., an Oregon Corporat

[Cite as State v. Bender, 2023-Ohio-486.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. OT-22-019 Appellee Trial Court No. 21 CR 002 v. Robertson Bender, Jr. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

NO. 07-08-0359-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E JULY 28, 2010 ______________________________ THI OF TEXAS AT LUBBOCK I, LLC, D/B/A SOUTHWEST REGIONAL SPECIALT

609 P.2d 844 (1980) 45 Or.App. 791 Peter B. CRANDALL and Cora D. Crandall, Appellants, v. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF OREGON, James E. Sexson, Director, Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, and Medford Irrigation District, Respondents. CA No. 12089. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 14, 1980. Deci

06/28/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 3, 2019 Session STAINMASTER CARPET & RESTORATION, LLC ET AL. v. MUSIC CITY MESSENGER SERVICE, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 15-289-II William E. Young, Chancellor

[Cite as State ex rel. US Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2020-Ohio-3427.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. US Tubular Products, Inc. : d.b.a. Benmit Hydro-Testers Division, : Relator, : v.

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Before the Court is plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Motion and Brief in Support as to the Appropriate Amount of Disgorgement and Civil Monetary Penalties for defendants Intrade The Prediction Market Limited and Trade Exchange Network's Violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations. ECF No. 71. Upon consideration, the Court GRANTS

LEE, J., specially concurring. I concur in the result of the majority opinion and with the stated reason for holding for the respondent (i.e. the failure of the petitioner to qualify, as nonprofit-making, for the ORS 657.045(1) and (2) (c) exemption). However, I believe the majority is mistaken in indicating that but for the profit-making nature of the district’s contracts with “five or si

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMERISOURCEBERGEN § CORPORATION, § § No. 60, 2020 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2019-0527-JTL LEBANON COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ § RETIREMENT FUND and § TEAMSTERS LOCAL

(2008) Darlene CROUCH, Plaintiff, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant. No. 4:06-cv-113. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. March 19, 2008. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S DEFAMATION CLAIM RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge. Before the court are the "Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's Tr

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 720 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 721 OPINION. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Richard T. Brunsman, Jr., appeals f