⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Francisco J. Bustos”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE STEVEN D. MOLASKY, No. 14-60080 Debtor, BAP No. 14-1109 AUGUSTINE C. BUSTOS, Appellant, OPINION v. STE
Arizona Supreme Court · 2024-08-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA DAVID FRANCISCO, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AFFILIATED UROLOGISTS LTD, ET AL. Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-23-0152-PR Filed August 16, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable J
Morales v. Mukaseypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 261 F. App'x 956
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Bustos Morales petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reconsider and reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion, see Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999), and we deny in part and grant in part the petitio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-05-27 · Published · cited 40× · 113 F.3d 1512
113 F.3d 1512 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3936, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 6806Harbinder Dhariwal SINGH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Janet RENO, Attorney General; Thomas J. Schiltgen, DistrictDirector of Immigration and Naturalization Service, SanFrancisco, California; Immigration And NaturalizationService, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-16373. United States Court of Appeals,Nin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT E. & J. GALLO WINERY,  No. 05-16504 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-05-00101-AWI ANDINA LICORES S.A., OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court
In re L.E.J.public domain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983-08-02 · Published · cited 1× · 465 A.2d 374
TERRY, Associate Judge: This is an appeal from a finding of neglect by the Family Division of the Superior Court and an order placing L.E.J., an infant, in the temporary custody of the Social Rehabilitation Administration. Appellant contends that D.C.Code § 16-2316(c) (1981), which permits a trial court to draw an inference of neglect from certain evidence, was unconstitutionally applied to her and is unconstitutionally vagu
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2017-07-13 · Published · cited 1× · 570 B.R. 92
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge: The question is whether to permit intervention in this adversary proceeding as either intervention “of right” or “permissive” intervention under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, as incorporated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7024. The question of intervention arises in the wake of this co
Doe v. Grindr Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 11× · 128 F.4th 1148
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE, an individual, No. 24-475 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02093- ODW-PD v. GRINDR INC.; GRINDR LLC, OPINION Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the Un
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984-11-13 · Published · cited 38× · 746 F.2d 715; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16786
*718VANCE, Circuit Judge: For most people, being stranded for several days aboard a disabled fishing boat in the Gulf of Mexico twenty miles northwest of Grand Cayman Island would constitute a misfortune of epic proportions.1 The travails of appellants in this case, however, began in earnest on
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID RAINERO, No. 14-17106 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cv-01553-GMN-PAL ARCHON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding Argued
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-08-06 · Published · cited 2× · 8 F.4th 91
18-1120-cv Tobias Bermudez Chavez, et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 (Argued: March 4, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2021) Docket No. 18-1120-cv TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, GERARDO ANTONIO FONESCA TORRES, FRANKLIN GUILLEN SALAZAR, GARCIA MONTES JOSE GABINO, MARIANO DE LOS ANGELES PIZARRO, ANTONIO OSORN
Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 274 F. Supp. 3d 578
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Ace Hardware Corporation’s (“Ace Hardware”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 13) (“the Motion”). Having considered each Parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. Background On February 17, 2017, Pla
Singh v. Renopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-05-27 · Published · cited 82× · 113 F.3d 1512; 97 Daily Journal DAR 6610; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3936; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12173; 1997 WL 274746
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent. Never before have we held that a lawful permanent resident forfeits his basic and precious right to live and work in this country if he engages in innocent, well-intentioned, and temporary absences — in this case, spending time abroad with his wife and young child while waiting for the INS to grant the visa petition that would allow them to join him here. Contr
Puc-Ruiz v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-12-23 · Published · cited 39× · 629 F.3d 771; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 26109; 2010 WL 5185803
629 F.3d 771 (2010) Jorge Angel PUC-RUIZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Nos. 09-1296, 09-3629. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 23, 2010. Filed: December 23, 2010. *775 Omar C. Jadwat, argued, New York, NY, Anthony E. Rot
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011-05-11 · Published · cited 53× · 646 F.3d 732; 2011 WL 1783008
646 F.3d 732 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Joseph TRESTYN, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Crystal Kay Herren, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-8029, 10-8046. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 11, 2011. *735 Thomas A. Fleener, of Fleener
Smith v. Garlandpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-06-03 · Published · cited 18× · 103 F.4th 663
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARLON ALONZO SMITH, No. 22-954 Agency No. Petitioner, A036-706-804 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-09-11 · Published · cited 300× · 343 F.3d 1107; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10427; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8266; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18869; 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1065
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Godofredo “Freddy” Hernandez brings this employment discrimination suit against his employer, Spacelabs Medical, Inc. (“Spacelabs”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Washington Law Against Discrimination (“WLAD”), R.C.W. § 49.60.010 et seq.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015-03-20 · Published · cited 31× · 414 U.S. App. D.C. 305; 780 F.3d 1185; 2015 A.M.C. 1003; 598 Fed. Appx. 7; 2015 WL 1589356; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4534
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SRINIVASAN. SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge: Luis Alberto Munoz Miranda and Francisco Jose Valderrama Carvajal, citizens of Colombia, pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy charges under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA). They contend on appeal that the MDLEA is unconstitutional as applied to their conduct
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10411 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cr-00007- LRH-CBC-1 LECHARLES BALDON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the U