Cases

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: Frank O’Connell and Francisco Carrillo were wrongfully imprisoned for decades before eventually securing habeas relief. After release, they separately brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in federal district court against the police investigators involved in their respective cases, arguing in part the officers failed to d

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANCISCO CARRILLO, JR., No. 12-57229 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cv-10310- SVW-AGR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CRAIG DITSCH, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central Distri

Filed 6/9/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CHRISTOPHER TREJO, B293564 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS167487) v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Cou

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 620 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 621 OPINION Plaintiff William C. Shoemaker, M.D., was removed from the administrative positions he held with

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10233 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cr-00026- v. MMD-WGC-1 3:20-cr-00026- GUSTAVO CARRILLO-LOPEZ, MMD-WGC Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from th

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 130 (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 639 Carlos Enrique ZERON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B121152. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two. October 28, 1998. As Modified October 30, 1998. Bruce Philip Barnett, Encino, for Plaintiff and Appellant. J

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1092 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1093 OPINION The trial court denied a petition for writ of mandate and for injunctive rel

50 Cal.Rptr.3d 822 (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 977 Henry PARRA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents. Edmund Cota et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. City and County of San Francisco et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A112331. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1141 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1142 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

205 Cal.App.3d 1522 (1988) 253 Cal. Rptr. 331 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. VENICE PENINSULA PROPERTIES, Defendant and Appellant. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. STATE LANDS COMMISSION, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. SUMMA CORPORATION et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants. Docket No. B034790. Court of Appeals of Cal

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge. In the midst of this litigation over the conditions of confinement at the Monterey County Jail, the parties did something different. They did something commendable. They cooperated. Their cooperation took the form of an agreement to retain four neutral experts.1

Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. **673*541The City and County of San Francisco (San Francisco) imposes a tax on drivers who park their cars in paid parking lots. To enforce the tax, the city requires parking lot operators to collect the tax from driver

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. S242835 First Appellate District, Division One A144500 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CPF-14-513-434

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 794 (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1061 In re FRANCISCO M, a Minor, on Habeas Corpus. In re Jesus G, a Minor, on Habeas Corpus. Nos. B146747, B146905. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five. January 31, 2001. *797 Bruce A. Hoffman, Alternate Public Defender, Cynthia Kairys and Richard L. Sternf

91 Cal.Rptr.2d 66 (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931 COUNTY OF AMADOR, Plaintiff, v. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY et al., Defendants; Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest. Boyd Gibbons, as Director, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. El Dorado County Water Agency et al., Defendants and Appellants; Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. League to Save Sie

647 F.3d 870 (2011) Patrick M. McCOLLUM; Ian Shane Duncan; Kenneth E. Capogreco; Donnie Dacus; Scott Forrest Collins; Kevin Coy Iloff; David Spooner; Gregory L. Mourland, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; Office Of Community Resources; California State Personnel Board; Avenal State Prison; California Correctional Center; California Correc

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants; PROTECT APP-BASED DRIVERS AND SERVICES et al., Interveners and Appellants. S279622 First Appellate District, Division Four A163655 Alameda County Superior

Filed 3/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RG21088725) et al., Defendants and Appellants, PROTECT APP-BASED DRI

Filed 4/12/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21088725) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,