Cases

408 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2005) In re: WESTERN STATES WHOLESALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, And All Related Cases. Fairhaven Power Company, Plaintiff, v. Encana Corporation, et. al., Defendants. Abelman Art Glass, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Encana Corporation et. al., Defendants. Utility Savings & Refund Services, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc., et

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 06-896L Filed: February 8, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * THE WESTERN SHOSHONE * IDENTIFIABLE GROUP, represented * by the YOMBA SHOSHONE TRIBE, * a federally recognized Indian Tribe, * et al., * Plaintiffs,

OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Appellants — three business associations that were purportedly assigned oil and gas leases on certain land in Crockett County — appeal the trial court’s partial grant of summary judgment and merits verdict naming Appellee Oz Gas Corporation as the true leaseholder of the disputed land and assessing damages

Filed 3/4/19; Certified for publication 4/2/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, A152428 v. (Alameda County FRANCES TODD, INC., et al.,

Opinion FLYNN, J. The defendants, VitalWorks, Inc. (VitalWorks), and Cerner Physician Associates, Inc. (Cerner), appeal from the judgments of the trial court awarding damages, costs and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff, Western Dermatology Consultants, P.C. The plaintiff appeals from the court’s refusal to award punitive damages, prejudgment interest and certain costs, as well as from the court’s ref

*192 Cordy, J. These consolidated appeals are before us on a single justice’s reservation and report of challenges made to an order of the Department of Public Utilities (department). Those challenges raise the question of the department’s authority to review and approve ratepayer-backed, long-term contracts

INGRAHAM, Judge: This dispute arises out of the unitized oil and gas operations in the Yates Field in Pecos and Crockett Counties, Texas. Francis Oil & Gas, Inc., and various individuals (hereinafter “appellees”) sought a declaratory judgment from the district court that *485the unit agreements governing the Yates Field Unit “did not effect a reallocation and cros

WARD, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, a corporation of New Jersey, served its summons and complaint in the Supreme Court of the state of New York upon one Steinmuller as managing agent of the defendant, a corporation of the state of Indiana. The defendant removed the case to the District Court, appearing specially for the purpose of moving to. set aside the service of process. [1] It is

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

[1] In this action for an accounting, plaintiffs are the owners of overriding royalty interests in gas produced from two wells in Texas County. Defendant, Western Gas Interstate Company (Western), a gas pipeline company, is the owner, operator and producer of the leasehold comprising the production units subject to plaintiffs' interest. Western is a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant Southern Union Gas Company, the only customer served by Western. [2] Plaintiffs' rights to ro

523 F.Supp.2d 827 (2007) CEMENT-LOCK, an Illinois limited liability company, and Richard Mell, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. GAS TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, an Illinois corporation, Institute of Gas Technology, an Illinois corporation, Endesco Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Endesco Clean Harbors, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Stanley S. Borys, an individual, James E. Dunne, an individual, Francis S. Lau, an individual, Cement-Lo

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Great Lakes, a pipeline company, Trans-Canada, its principal customer, and other interested firms petition for review of several orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “Commission”): Great Lakes Gas Transmission L.P., 57 FERC ¶ 61,140, 61,51

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter came before the court on June 22, 2016, for hearing of defendants’ motions to dismiss brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. Nos. 51, 55, 57, 59, 63, 64.) Attorneys Patricia K. Oliver, R. Rex Parris, and Jennifer F. Novak appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Committee

Dissenting Opinion by Justice CASTILLO. I respectfully dissent. The jury below found appellant, Western Steel Company, Inc., negligent for injuries sustained by appellee, Hank Altenburg, in an industrial accident. The jury also found that Alten-burg was not a “borrowed employee” of Western Steel.1 In two issues, Western Steel asserts that the evidence was legally and factually insuff

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Appellee and seller, Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. (Kaiser-Francis), sought to enforce the provisions of two similar gas purchase contracts (the “Ellis” and “Cronin” contracts) against appellant and buyer, Producer’s Gas Co. (PGC). Under the contracts, PGC was required to take or pay for certain minimum quantities of gas from wells in which Kaiser-Francis had a

32 F.Supp.2d 1026 (1998) James A. MOTLEY, Plaintiff, v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant. No. IP 95-0308-C M/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. July 23, 1998. *1027 *1028 *1029 *1030 K

MILLER, Judge. These appeals are from separate orders of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Western Slope Gas Company (“Western Slope”). The judgment against Superior Oil Company (“Superior”) was entered pursuant to Western Slope’s motion for summary judgment. The judgment against Continental Oil Company (“Conoco”) was entered on the court’s joinder of the cases for the purposes of sa

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARCIA S. KRIEGER, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant Suncor Energy (U.S.A.), Inc.’s (“Suncor”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# 181, 185) on all claims for relief by the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs’ responses (#198, 200), and Sun-cor’s replies (# 217, 219); Suncor’s Motion

703 F.Supp.2d 1211 (2010) FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT, INC., d/b/a Fairfield Development LP, Plaintiff, and Axis Surplus Insurance Co., Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. J.D.I. CONTRACTOR & SUPPLY, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-cv-02792-MSK-KMT. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 8, 2010. *1212 Eduardo Martin Enriqu