Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Francis v. 132 Ludlow ST LLC”
Preferred Care of Delaware, Inc. v. Crockerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas B. Russell, Senior'Judge, United States District Court The parties have engaged in extensive briefing of this matter. The Plaintiffs filed this action pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 4, seeking to compel arbitration of Defendant Dorothy Crocker’s state law claims and to enjoin the state court action under the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.
Douglass v. District of Columbiapublic domain
605 F.Supp.2d 156 (2009) Herbert DOUGLASS, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-947 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2009. *158 Ellen Douglass Dalton, William E. Houston, Paul S. Dalton, Dalton & Dalton, PC, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. Melvin W. Bolde
People v. Trumppublic domain
People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HERBERT DOUGLASS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 04-947 (CKK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 31, 2009) Plaintiff Herbert Douglass (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendant Distri
Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Northrop Grumman Corp.public domain
CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: This environmental insurance coverage action was commenced in April 2012 by Travelers Indemnity Co. and various affiliated companies (together, “Travelers”) against Northrop Grumman Corp. and Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. (together, “Northrop” or, during discussions of historical points, “Grumman”), and Century Indemnity Co. (
Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United Statespublic domain
INTERIM REPORT REGARDING S. 794 “A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF LAND GRANTORS IN HENDERSON, UNION, AND WEBSTER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY, AND THEIR HEIRS” AND MEMORANDUM OPINION BRADEN, Judge. Shortly after the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired approximately 35,849.28 acres of land in the counties of Henderson, Union, and Webster, Kentucky to establish an Army training facility, that later