Cases

OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Relators RSR Corporation and Quemet-co Metals Limited, Inc. (collectively RSR) filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking to overturn the trial court’s order disqualifying RSR’s trial counsel, Bickel & Brewer, from further participation in the case. Because we cannot say the trial court

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM

524 F.3d 33 (2008) Francis MARCOUX, et al., Plaintiffs, Mac's Shell Service, Inc.; Cynthia Karol; John A. Sullivan; Akmal, Inc.; Sid Prashad; Ram Corporation, Inc.; J & M. Avramidis, Inc.; Three K's, Inc.; Stephen Pisarczyk, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; Motiva Enterprises LLC; Shell Oil Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-2771. United States Court of Appeals

Indian breaeh-of-trust ease; claim of alleged breach of fiduciary duties by the Bureau of Indian Affairs as trustee of Tribe’s funds; Phase 2 of case; pre-trial in limine motions OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. Plaintiff Jicarilla Apache Nation (“Jicaril-la”) has filed two motions in limine seeki

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-852V January 31, 2017 To be Published *************************************** L.A.M., * * Petitioner, * Human papillomavirus (“HPV”)

902 A.2d 930 (2006) 387 N.J. Super. 1 Eric STOECKEL, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Jacqueline Stoeckel, Thomas Esposito and Karen Esposito, Plaintiffs, v. TOWNSHIP OF KNOWLTON, Norman Chidiac and Charles O'Connell, Defendants-Respondents, and Ira Cohen, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Richard Fifield, Daniel Vnencheck, Richard Stein and Mulligan & Mulligan, Defendants.

ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

190 S.W.3d 451 (2006) MISSOURIANS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING, et al., Appellants, v. Robin CARNAHAN, Secretary of State, et al., Respondents. Nos. WD 66495, WD 66496. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 28, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 25, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied May 11, 2006.

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART PARTIES’ OBJECTIONS David Alan Ezra, Senior United States Distict Judge On November 3, 2016, the Court held a hearing on (1) Defendants Air Liquide America Specialty Gases, L.L.C. (“Air Liq-uide”), Arizona Public Service Company (“AZ Public Service”), ChemResearch Co., Inc. (“ChemResearch”), City of Phoe

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

91 B.R. 525 (1988) In re KROH BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Beverly Plaza Associates, Debtors. BEVERLY PLAZA ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. B. Francis SAUL, II and Garland J. Bloom, Jr., Trustees, B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 87-00640-1-11, 87-01631-1-11, Adv. No. 87-0231-1-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. September 2

124 Ill.2d 300 (1988) 529 N.E.2d 558 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. VINCENT WILLIAMS, Appellee. No. 65895. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed September 22, 1988. *301 *302 Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Richard M. Daley

532 F.Supp.2d 595 (2008) Charlene MORISSEAU, Plaintiff, v. DLA PIPER, et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 13255(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 23, 2008. *596 *597 Charlene Morisseau, e York City, Plaintiff Pro se.[*] Bettina B. Pleven, Edward Brill, Pr

349 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2005) Karen M. SCHMIDT and Daniel J. Schmidt, Plaintiffs, v. FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C03-3094-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. January 3, 2005. *1173 Chad Andrew Swanson, Dutton Braun Staack Hellman Iversen, Waterloo, IA, for Plaintiffs. Debra Lynne Hulett

TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.78 STANDARDS IN DECIDING THE MOTIONS .79 DISCUSSION.80 I.Statute of Limitations.•.80 A. Section 10(b) Claims .80 1. The Applicable Statute of Limitations.80 2. The Date of Commencement of the Related Actions.82- 3. The One-Year/Three-Year Rule.83 a) The

664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston