Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 12, 2023 NO. 03-22-00303-CV Francine Lee Lankford and Frank T. Vickers, Appellants v. Salvador Abreo and Frank J. Dzienowski, Jr, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00303-CV Francine Lee Lankford and Frank T. Vickers, Appellants v. Salvador Abreo and Frank J. Dzienowski, Jr., Appellees FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 423-6129, THE HONORABLE J. D. LANGLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM O

563 S.E.2d 92 (2002) FRANCINE DELANY NEW SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASHEVILLE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. COA01-420. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 21, 2002. *93 Goldsmith, Goldsmith & Dews, P.A., by C. Frank Goldsmith, Jr., Marion, for plaintiff-appellee. Schwartz

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 June 20,

Per Curiam. A circuit judge (Judge) of the First Circuit Court (Court) summarily sanctioned attorney Gary Victor Dubin (Appellant) for tardiness in his court appearances by imposing a fine of $500. Appellant appeals the Order for Payment of Monetary Sanction (Order), contending that the Judge improperly sanctioned Appellant. We agree and vacate the Order. I. In the un

COHEN, C.J., Janie Lerma-Fusco (“Lerma-Fusco”), as the personal representative of the estate of Franco Fusco, appeals from an order granting Dennis and Tina Smith’s (“the Smiths”) motion to set aside an order striking the Smiths’ statement of claim and from an order granting the Smiths’ emergency motion for temporary injunction to freeze éstate assets. We dismiss the appeal from

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D. After the Supreme Court issued its decision on December 13, 1990, in Holmdel Builders Ass’n v. Township of Holmdel, 121 N.J. 550, 583 A.2d 277 (1990), the Council On Affordable Housing (COAH) issued an “Administrative Order” (AO) on January 28, 1991, announcing its intention to adopt regulations with respect to mandatory development fe

471 B.R. 69 (2012) In re NEW YORK SKYLINE, INC., Debtor. Empire State Building Company L.L.C. and Empire State Building, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. New York Skyline, Inc., Defendant. New York Skyline, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Empire State Building Company L.L.C., Empire State Building, Inc. and Empire State Building Associates L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10181 (SMB). Adversary Nos. 09-1107, 09-1145. <

Opinion filed November 14, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00059-CR __________ GREGORY FRANK ESTES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 104th District Court Taylor County

Sanders, J. — The question in this case is the sufficiency of service of process where plaintiff attempted service of process by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with defendant’s brother at her parents’ home. The only issue is whether the place where the summons was left constitutes defendant’s house of usual abode. Under these facts, we conclude that service complied with RCW

432 B.R. 66 (2010) In re NEW YORK SKYLINE, INC., Debtor. Empire State Building Company L.L.C. and Empire State Building, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. New York Skyline, Inc., Defendant. New York Skyline, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Empire State Building Company L.L.C., Empire State Building, Inc. and Empire State Building Associates L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10181 (SMB). Adversary Nos. 09-1107 (SMB), 09-1145(SMB).

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Frank P. Mangiatordi, the attorney for the plaintiff Judy Williams, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), entered August 8, 1995, which awarded counsel fees to Douglas Kaplan, the former attorney for the plaintiff, of 60% of a one-third contingency fee on a $40,000 settlement. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the nonparty respo

PER CURIAM. Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in *1254ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution

51 Cal.App.4th 753 (1996) LOREN HANSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. LOREN HANSEN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. Docket Nos. A073072, A073074. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. November 13, 1996.

77 Wn. App. 775 (1995) 893 P.2d 1136 PAMELA SHELDON, Respondent, v. FRANCINE FETTIG, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 13547-1-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. May 9, 1995. Scott A. Bruns and Dohn, Talbott, Simpson, for petitioners. Frank E. Morris and Morris & Church, for respondent. <

18 So.3d 1089 (2009) CHARLOTTE COUNTY, Lee County, and Sarasota County, Appellants, v. IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY and Department of Environmental Protection, Appellees. No. 2D06-3848. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 10, 2009. Rehearing Denied March 4, 2009. *1090 Stephen E. DeMarsh, Cou

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 39247 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) TERMINATION OF THE PARENTAL ) Boise, January 2012 Term RIGHTS OF JANE (2011-16) DOE. ) -------------------------------------------------------- ) 2012 Opinion No. 29 IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & )

270 P.3d 1048 (2012) In the Matter of the Termination of the Parental Rights of Jane (2011-16) Doe. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & WELFARE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jane (2011-16) DOE, Respondent-Appellant. No. 39247. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2012 Term. February 16, 2012. Alan E. Trimming, Ada County Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Matter of Wechsler (2022 NY Slip Op 02271) Matter of Wechsler 2022 NY Slip Op 02271 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

PER CURIAM. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse defendant’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate that conviction.1 See Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991) (where possession of firearm used to enhance felony, single act of using firearm in commission of same crime could