Cases

OPINION ROBB, Judge. Toby Lakins appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss a petition to establish paternity filed by Amy Feldman,1 which alleged that Lakins was the father of K.L.O. We reverse and remand. Issue Lakins presents three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court properly

816 N.E.2d 906 (2004) In re the PATERNITY OF K.L.O., Minor Child, b/n/f Amy Feldman, Toby L. Lakins, Appellant-Respondent, v. Amy M. Feldman, Appellee-Petitioner. No. 50A03-0312-JV-494. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 27, 2004. *907 Monty K. Woolsey, Miroff, Cross & Woolsey Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.</

SCHWELB, Senior Judge, concurring: The law, in its majestic equality, fobbids THE RICH AS WELL AS THE POOR TO SLEEP UNDER BRIDGES, TO BEG IN THE STREETS, AND TO STEAL BREAD. Anatole France, Le Lys Rouge, ch. 7 (1894). I. I concur in the judgment and, for the most part, in the opinion of the court. I write separately, however, because

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 53 The plaintiffs have appealed from an order entered in the Circuit Court of Lake County, dismissing their petition for leave to file a complaint in quo warranto in which they sought to test the incorporation of the Village of Green Oaks and the subsequent annexation of lands to that village. The incorpo

36 Md. App. 249 (1977) 373 A.2d 331 FRANCES IRENE LEE v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1077, September Term, 1976. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 20, 1977. The cause was argued before MOYLAN, DAVIDSON and MOORE, JJ. Harry J. Lambeth, Assigned Public Defender, for appellant. F. Ford Loker, Assistant Attorney

429 N.E.2d 1110 (1981) STATE of Indiana, Appellant, v. William R. LEWIS, M.D., Appellee. No. 381S84. Supreme Court of Indiana. December 31, 1981. Rehearing Denied February 24, 1982. *1111 Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Jack F. Crawford, Pros. Atty., 31st Judic

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5067 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00766-JEB Filed On: March 26, 2025 J.G.G., et al., Appellees v. Do

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I can join neither the reasoning of the court nor its conclusion that the federal courts lack power to consider the detainees’ petitions. While I agree that Congress intended to withdraw federal jurisdiction through the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (“MCA”), the court’s holding that the MCA is consistent with the Suspension Clause of A

Scileppi, J. (dissenting). I agree with the Chief Judge inasmuch as he would hold that these divorces are void; however, I would permit the present appellants to succeed on this appeal. As we analyze the cases in this area, we must be ever mindful that we are not dealing with a decree of a sister State, but with one of a foreign nation. Decrees of a foreign nation are not only not entitled to full faith and cred

Judgment of the trial court in the sum of $8,000 was in favor of Nan LeBron Davidson, plaintiff, and against Lakeview, Inc. It was based upon damages for loss of life by the drowning in Lake Overholser on May 15, 1929, of plaintiff's five year old son, resulting from the sinking of a pleasure boat furnished for hire by defendant to the child's father, who at the same time was drowned. Negligence relied upon as the proximate cause of the damages is the defective condition of the boat so furnis

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge (dissenting). We had oral argument in this case on April 6, 1959. On the same day, without stopping to write an opinion, my brothers summarily entered an order reversing the judgment and remanding the case for a new trial. They have now filed the foregoing opinion containing one brief decisional paragraph, which I quote:

OPINION FRANKEL, District Judge. On November 2, 1956, a Westchester County grand jury indicted petitioner on charges of attempted sodomy, assault and criminal sexual practices upon an eleven-year-old boy. The crimes were alleged to have been committed on September 1, 1956. In November of 1965, nine years after the indictment, petitioner’s case came on for trial. During more than seven of those interven

385 A.2d 1148 (1978) Frederick Douglass LEWIS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMISSION ON LICENSURE TO PRACTICE the HEALING ART, Respondent. No. 11821. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 9, 1977. Decided April 27, 1978. *1149 Justin D. Simon, Washington, D. C. with whom Seymour Glanzer,

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge (dissenting): The majority of this three-judge court has decided that 31 D.C.Code, § 101 (1961) is sustained alternatively by the District clause of Article I and the appointments provisions of Article II of the Constitution. I cannot agree. Ordinarily, nullifying an Act of Congress as unconstitutional is a drastic venture. But the institutional considerations which persuade court

BIGGS, Chief Judge. Currens, the appellant, was convicted by a jury of a violation of Section 2312, Title 18 U.S.C., the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, the so-called “Dyer” Act, and was committed as a young adult offender to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment and supervision pursuant to Section 5010(b) of the Youth. Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b), until d

SCHAUER, J. Defendant was charged with the murder of his wife and with assault upon his wife’s friend, Mrs. Elva Sam, with intent to commit murder. To each charge he pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. Upon trial of the general issue a jury found that he was guilty of each offense and that the murder was of the first degree. The. verdict upon the murder count wa

288 F.2d 853 110 U.S.App.D.C. 41 Comer BLOCKER, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 15777. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 16, 1960.Decided March 3, 1961. Mr. J. William Doolittle, Jr., Washington, D.C. (appointed by this co

Christianson, J. On July 22, 1911, and for several years prior thereto, the plaintiff was living with her husband, John Erickson, upon the southeast quarter of section 23, township 161, range 90, in Burke county. This land adjoined the town site of Coteau. John Erickson was the record owner thereof, but it is undisputed that it was occupied *197by him and his wife (the pl

The preliminary questions are whether the trial court, possessed of the dual powers of a court of equity and a court of law by the Code, was vested with jurisdiction to settle the whole controversy presented to it under the pleadings, whether it was the duty of the trial court to settle the whole controversy in one decree, and whether defendant in error's motion to dismiss the cause on appeal should have been sustained. Lew H. Wentz, the defendant below, became a member of the State Hi