Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frances Lee Samuels”
Frances Nesti v. Agency of Transportationpublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2023 VT 1
State v. Frances Anita Robinsonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00153-CR 8331539 THIRD C
Allen v. United Financial Mortgage Corp.public domain
660 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2009) Euel ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORP.; Alliance Bancorp; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., California Reconveyance Co.; GMAC Mortgage; JP Morgan Chase Bank and Does 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. No. 09-2507 SC. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 15, 2009. *
Frances Gecker, Not Individually But for Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Estate (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)public domain
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge This dispute relates to a money judgment the court previously entered against the Estate of Kevin Flynn, a former CEO of the now-bankrupt Emerald Casino, Inc. Frances Gecker, the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, has moved to compel turnover of certain assets in satisfaction of the judgment. Susan Flynn, Kevin Flynn's surviving
Paul E. Farrell Frances G. Farrell v. United Statespublic domain
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge. We hold today that income earned by a taxpayer on Johnston Island, a U.S. insular possession, is not excludable from gross income as “foreign earned income” under § 911 of the Internal Revenue Code. Neither is it income derived from a source within a “specified possession” as defined by § 931 of the Code. We therefore affirm the district court.
In re Wylypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA J. HOUSER, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is a motion to enforce the automatic stay (the “Motion”) that the debtor, Caroline “Dee” Wyly (“Dee”), brought against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) after it named her as a relief defendant in its amended complaint filed in a separate civil action pending in the Southern District of New
Samuels v. Mladineopublic domain
608 So.2d 1170 (1992) Barbara Morris SAMUELS and Harold C. Samuels, Jr. v. Dr. John P. MLADINEO. No. 89-CA-0952. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 29, 1992. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1992. *1171 Lisa B. Milner, Binder Milner & Milner, Jackson, T. Mack Brabham, Brabham & Bean, McComb, for appellants.</
State of Tennessee v. Sanford Lee Parkerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 24, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SANFORD LEE PARKER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 11037-III Rex Henry Ogle, Judge No. E2006-02412-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 19, 2008 The Defendant, Sanford Lee Parker, was convicted of felony driving under the
Britt v. Chrysler Corp.public domain
Frances Britt appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Chrysler Corporation and Royal Motor Company. Britt sued Chrysler and Royal for breach of contract, breach of warranty, misrepresentation, negligence, wantonness, and under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD). She alleged that her 1993 Plymouth Sundance Duster was inherently dangerous and defective because her driver's side airbag failed to deploy in one accident and improperly deployed
Ellenburg v. JA Solar Holdings Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge. The plaintiffs, investors who purchased or otherwise acquired American Depository Shares of the China-based solar cell manufacturer JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd. (“JA Solar”) between August 12, 2008 and November 12, 2008 (the “class period”), bring these class actions against JA Solar, its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) Huaijin Yang, and its Chief F
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge. This Court has before it Defendant SmithKline Beechham Corporation’s Mo*1025tion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 71). Plaintiffs filed a response to the motion (Dk
Elmer J. Benes and Frances M. Benes, E. J. Benes & Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuepublic domain
ORDER. Thr above cause coming on to be heard on the briefs, record, and arguments of the parties, and the Court being duly advised: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reason.', set forth in the opinion of Judge Pierce, reported in
CAMERON, Circuit Judge. Samuel W. Marshall, Jr., and his wife, Frances M. Marshall, petitioned for a review of a decision of the Tax Court sustaining the Commissioner in disallowing income tax deductions for the years 1947 through 1950 to the extent claimed by petitioners. 1
Crayton v. Statepublic domain
BLACKWELL, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The Court concludes that aggravated assault and felony murder premised on the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon do not merge, but in the circumstances of this case, I disagree. To the extent that the Court affirms the conviction and sentence for aggravated assault, I respectfully dissent. I otherwise conc
and 17SA303, Yamasaki Ring v. Dillpublic domain
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to
Clarke v. Richmond Behavioral Health Authoritypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronnie Clarke appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action against Defendants because Clarke failed to file an amended complaint as ordered by the district court. Clarke has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record
Williams v. National Housing Exchange, Inc.public domain
45 F.Supp.2d 648 (1999) Donna Lee H. WILLIAMS, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware, as Receiver of National Heritage Life Insurance Company in Rehabilitation, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, Midwest Independent Bank, and Midwest Mortgage Servicing, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL HOUSING EXCHANGE, INC., APX Mortgage Services, Inc., and Resources Asset Management, Inc., Defendant. No. 95 C 4243.
Gray v. Binderpublic domain
PRESENT: All the Justices STEVEN C. GRAY OPINION BY v. Record No. 161419 CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 2, 2017 FRANCES BINDER, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Brett A. Kassabian, Judge In this appeal, we consider whether a potential beneficiary under a will ma
Williams v. National Housing Exchange, Inc.public domain
949 F.Supp. 650 (1996) Donna Lee H. WILLIAMS, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware, As Receiver of National Heritage Life Insurance Company In Rehabilitation, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, and Midwest Mortgage Servicing, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL HOUSING EXCHANGE, INC. APX Mortgage Services, Inc., and Resource Asset Management, Defendants. No. 95 C 4243. United States
Justice BREYER, dissenting. Laches is a doctrine that bars a plaintiff's claim when there has been unreasonable, prejudicial delay in commencing suit. See 1 D. Dobbs, Law of Remedies § 2.3(5), p. 89 (2d ed. 1993). The question before us is whether a court can apply this doctrine in a patent infringement action for damages brought within the statute of limitations. The Court holds that a court cannot. Laches, it says, is a "gap-fill