Cases

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Martha Mahaffey Butler and * From the 18th District Charles E. Ezell, Court of Johnson County, Trial Court No. C201000055. Vs. No. 11-12-00303-CV * October 16, 2014 Dave R. Horton et al., * Opinio

Opinion filed October 16, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-12-00303-CV ___________ MARTHA MAHAFFEY BUTLER AND CHARLES E. EZELL, Appellants V. DAVE R. HORTON ET AL., Appellees

PER CURIAM: This appeal involves the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Defendants-Appellants appeal from the district court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, declaring that plaintiff is entitled to receive benefits under two insurance policies indemnifying the life of her husband. We chiefly conclude that, when the evidence is inconclusive as to whether

FOLSOM, District Judge: Frances C. Hopson (“Hopson”) sued her former employer, Quitman County Hospital and Nursing Home Inc. (“the hospital”), in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi alleging that her termination violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA” or “the Act”). She also asserted state law claims for violation of the hospital’s p

141 F.3d 1038 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1467, 23 Fla. L.Weekly Fed. C 1397Frances W. HORTON, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Provident Life andAccident Insurance Company,Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.Frances W. HORTON, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. The trial court entered a summary judg- ' ment in favor of Appellees1 in which it declared the ownership of certain mineral and royalty interests as between Appellants and Appellees. It also denied Appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Because they were dissatisfied with the trial court’s summary judgment rulings, Appellants brought this a

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 132 Docket: Pen-20-3 Argued: September 17, 2020 Decided: November 10, 2020 Panel: GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. FRANCES QUIRK v. JOHN E. QUIRK SR. CONNORS, J. [¶1] Forty years is a long time. But becaus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1185 KA 13-01078 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AYIESHA HORTON, ALSO KNOWN AS AYISHA HORTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER, HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP (JOHN P. BRINGEWATT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDA

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Two months after Darrell Ewing was convicted of murder, a juror filed an affidavit accusing two fellow jurors of conducting after-hours internet research about the case and discussing their findings during deliberations. Without holding an evidentiary hearing to determine what, if any, prejudicial impact that extracurricular fact-finding had on the jury, the state

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 132 Docket: Pen-20-3 Argued: September 17, 2020 Decided: November 10, 2020 Panel: GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. FRANCES QUIRK v. JOHN E. QUIRK SR. CONNORS, J. [¶1] Forty years is a long time. But becaus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 644 KA 13-01863 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATTHEW B. HORTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DAVISON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOH

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0015p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DARRELL RASHARD EWING, ┐ Petitioner-Appellee, │ │

OPINION By the Court, Mowbray, C. J.: THE FACTS Appellant Frances Selsnick commenced an action for legal malpractice against Attorney Richard Horton. Appellant’s claims of negligence were based upon three grounds: (1) respondent Horton’s failure to prosecute an appeal of a summary judgment granted in favor of First Commercial Title; (2) Horton’s dismissal, w

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00237-CV ____________________ HJC CORPORATION, Appellant V. WENDALL LYNN HULSE AND FRANCES KAY HULSE, Appellees _______________________________________________________

November 19, 2015 Q2lZ /S-- OD311-CV 77r^l £gi/nP Ca^^hU C-i~CV~/<J~OQ7<SC, Cnunif Court ftt La^ A/q. I h-f ThloiS C&vniv } 7eX^3 f/on#rzh/<z ~T°&<£ /, Wpfij D*VJJD ^f\ETZ$CH X Tti 77/£ OPt/NTY CooRr f) /./ftO + y n r Lfiw tfori&££ onf n fth&ZfiM L

668 N.W.2d 208 (2003) In re The Matter of the John R. HORTON Irrevocable Trust Dated February, 1981. No. C1-02-2266. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 26, 2003. *210 Donald F. Ryan, Crow Wing County Attorney, Candace Prigge, Assistant County Attorney, Brainerd, MN, for appellant Crow Wing County Social Services. John H. Ericks

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 703 Appellant Bryan Scott Horton and another sixteen-year-old boy, Jeremy Keith Coffey, murdered a sixteen-year-old girl in her home, apparently because they wanted to take her father's pistol. Appellant and Coffey were taken into custody three days after the murder and, within hours, appellant confessed. Appell

J. Eugene Goddard, J. This is a claim brought by Robert L. Horton, individually and as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of Frances M. Horton, deceased, the wife of said Robert L. Horton. Letters of administration were issued to Robert L. Horton on November 1, 1965 and the above-entitled claim was filed on November 9, 1965. On October 22, 1965, shortly after 10:00 a.m., the decedent was operating a Volvo sedan aut

471 S.E.2d 879 (1996) 267 Ga. 1 HORTON v. BURCH. No. S96A1263. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 1, 1996. Frederick V. Massey, William E. Hicks, Hicks & Massey, Winder, for Horton. Walter G. Sammons, Jr., Williams, Sammons & Sammons, Warner Robins, for Burch. James F. Nelson, Jr., Nelson, Gillis & Smith, Dublin, for App

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: John Doe sued Columbia-Brazoria Independent School District, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The district court dismissed for the plaintiffs failure to state a claim. We AFFIRM. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND