Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES KROESSLER, individually, and No. 19-55671 on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:19-cv-00277- CAB-JLB v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, OPINION Defendant-Appel

ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. This class action alleges that Defendants NBTY Inc. (“NBTY”) and Rexall Sundown Inc. (“Rexall”) deceptively market and sell the Osteo Bi-Flex line of joint health dietary supplements without support for the efficacy representations made about those products. Plaintiff Liliana Cardenas, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated consume

Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification [DOC. No. 50] Virginia A. Phillips, Chief United States District Judge On September 14, 2016, Defendants Schwabe North America, Inc., and Nature’s Way Products, LLC, filed a motion for summary judgment as to all claims of Plaintiff Kathleen Sonner. (Doc. No. 50.) On November 14, 2016, Plaintiff fi

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. ’ On July 6, 2015, Defendant Pharmacare US, Inc. filed a motion to¡ dismiss and strike portions of Plaintiff Jonathan Kan-fer’s first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 32.) Plaintiff opposed the motion on September 14, 2015. (Doc. No. 33.) Defendant replied on September 21,2015. (Doc. No. 34.) On September 23, 2015, the

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT On June 25, 2015, Defendant Pharma-Care US, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss and *990strike portions of Plaintiff John Sandoval’s first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 11.) Plaintiff opposed the motion on September 14, 2015. (Doc, No. 13.) Defenda

820 F.Supp.2d 1371 (2011) Larry ZARRELLA, and Zarrella Construction, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 10-60754-Civ-WILLIAMS. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 25, 2011. *1373 John Marion Quaranta, Marguerite Clare Racher Snyder, Maria Victoria Olszewska, Weil Quaranta, P.A

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Debbie Krommenhock and Stephen Hadley bring this putative class action on behalf of a class of California consumers who purchased “high-sugar” cereal products manufactured by defendant Post Foods, LLC (“Post”). According to plaintiffs, those products’ labels contain health and wellness cl

782 F.Supp.2d 522 (2011) Dino RIKOS, Plaintiff, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 1:11-cv-226. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. May 4, 2011. *526 Leslie E. Hurst, Thomas Joseph O'Reardon, II, Timothy Gordon Blood, Blood Hurst & O'Reardon LLP, Alex M. Tomasevic, Craig McKenzie Nicho

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiffs Patrick Hughes (“Hughes”) and Nafise Nina Hodjat (“Hodjat”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this class action in diversity on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Ester-C Company (a subsidiary of NBTY, Inc.), NBTY, Inc., and NatureSmart LLC (collectively, “defendants” or “Ester-C Co.”). Specifically, plaintiffs alle

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs contend in these consolidated actions1 that Riddell, Inc. and its associated corporate entities (collectively, “Rid-dell” or “Defendants”) marketed a line of football helmets, primarily to youth and high school football players, with the purported ability to reduce concussions based on unique concussion red

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION In these consolidated actions,1 Plaintiffs maintain that Defendants Riddell, Inc., Riddell Sports Group, Easton-Bell Sports, LLC, EB Sports Corporation, RBG Holdings Corporation, and All American Sports Corporation (collectively, “Defendants” or “Riddell”) marketed their football helmets based on allegedly false or

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring this putative, nationwide class action against Defendant The Clorox Company (“Clorox”) in connection with its marketing and advertising of Fresh Step cat litter. Clorox’s Fresh Step uses carbon to eliminate cat odors, whereas other cat litter p

191 B.R. 781 (1996) Earl GEIGER, Plaintiff, v. John T. TOKHEIM and Mary Tokheim, Defendants. No. C 93-4019. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. February 1, 1996. *782 *783 *784 John D. Mayne of Mayne & Mayne, Sioux City, Iowa, for

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINTS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS (D.E. 68), DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (D.E. 84), AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF REPLY BRIEF (D.E. 86) JOAN A. LENARD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on D