Cases

2024 IL App (1st) 231245 No. 1-23-1245 Opinion filed December 9, 2024. First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ___

Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court City of Chicago v. Alexander, 2014 IL App (1st) 122858 Appellate Court THE CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Caption Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIEG E. ALEXANDER 1 et al., Defendants- Appellees. District & No. First District, Second Division

Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

POSNER, Circuit Judge. In 2013 and 2014, Chicago’s Department of Administrative Hearings determined that the plaintiff in this case, Discount Inn, Inc., had violated two City ordinances — the weed ordinance and the fencing ordinance. The weed ordinance provides that “any person who owns or controls property within the city must cut or otherwise control all weeds on such property

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14‐3678 DISCOUNT INN, INC., Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f

Memorandum Opinion and Order THOMAS M. DURKIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Federal Housing Financing Agency (“FHFA”) brought this lawsuit on its own behalf and on behalf of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) against Defendant City of Chicago. R. 1. FHFA alleges that an ordinance passed by the Chicago City Council in July

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

*1040MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Oasis’s Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the Motion. BACKGROUND The factual allegations at the core of this case raise a legal doctrine with ancient and medieval roots: champerty. Ch

Docket No. 93978–Agenda 37–September 2002. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. JOSEPH E. BIRKETT et al ., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Opinion filed October 18, 2002. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, Joseph E. Birkett, State

871 N.E.2d 765 (2007) 373 Ill. App.3d 1080 CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION and Carl Powell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-06-2206 WC. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Workers' Compensation Commission Division. May 29, 2007. *767

979 F.Supp. 708 (1997) Sandra TOWERS, Robert Sturdivant, and Kevin Amos, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 96 C 6510. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 30, 1997. *709 Thomas Peters, Mariel Nanasi, Chicago, IL, for Plai

779 N.E.2d 875 (2002) 202 Ill.2d 36 269 Ill.Dec. 21 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois ex rel. Joseph E. BIRKETT et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. The CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 93978. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 18, 2002. *877 Mara S. George

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI ) TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0466-JTL

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1751 WAUKEGAN POTAWATOMI CASINO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1751 WAUKEGAN POTAWATOMI CASINO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

JUSTICE LUND delivered the opinion of the court: Appeal is taken from an order of the circuit court of Champaign County entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the Fountain Head Drainage District (District), and denying the motion for summary judgment of the defendant city of Champaign (city). Relying principally upon section 12 — 3 of the Illinois Drainage Code (Code) (

BAUER, Chief Judge. For approximately the last twenty years, the Chicago Police Department promotion process has been a fountain of substantial, protracted litigation. Since 1976, when the district court determined that the 1971 sergeant’s promotion exams had a discriminatory impact upon blacks, Hispanics and females, the process of promoting patrol officers has been conducted pursuant to the district court’s equitable dec

37 F.Supp.2d 1056 (1999) N & N CATERING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendants. Alberto Bedoya d/b/a Casanovas, Inc., Plaintiff, v. City of Chicago, Richard M. Daley, as Mayor and Commissioner of the Liquor Control Commission of the City of Chicago, Liquor Control Commission of the City of Chicago, Defendants. Club Misty Inc., d/b/a Tequila Roadhouse, Plaintiff, v. James Laski, Clerk of the City of Ch

630 A.2d 684 (1993) Jacqueline Y. FOUNTAIN, et al., Appellants, v. Sharon Pratt KELLY, Appellee. No. 91-CV-1462. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 1, 1993. Decided August 23, 1993. *685 Stephen J. Harburg, with whom John H. Beisner, Thomas J. Karr, Ian G. Hinds, and Robert J. Hayes, Washington, D