Cases

61 So.3d 960 (2011) Thomas FOSTER, Clarence Powell, Roy L. Williams, Hue L. Fleming, and City of Ruleville, Mississippi, Appellants v. Shirley Jean EDWARDS, Hattie Robinson Jordan, James Johnson, Johnny Hill, Maro Robinson, and James Butch Jenkins, in their Individual Capacities, Appellees. No. 2009-CA-01683-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 3, 2011.

OPINION ¶ 1 Defendant-appellant, James Foster, appeals a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, granting the motion of plaintiff-appellee, Terrie Foster, to increase appellant's child support obligation. We affirm the decision of the trial court. ¶ 2 The parties were married and had two children together, Brandon, born August 1, 1992, and Kels

MIHALAKOS, J., dissenting. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly permitted the prosecutor to inquire into the nature of the civil lawsuit brought by the defendant, Larry Powell, against certain police officers and the city of Stamford. I do not agree that defense counsel “opened the door” to the questioning through his cross-examination of the state’s witness regarding a deposition ta

[Cite as State ex rel. Foster v. Brown Cty. Health Dept., 2017-Ohio-8430.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BROWN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO EX REL. : ROBERT FOSTER, et al., : CASE NO. CA2016-12-025 Appellants-Relators,

634 S.E.2d 162 (2006) MARINER HEALTHCARE, INC. et al. v. FOSTER. Foster v. Mariner Healthcare, Inc. et al. Nos. A06A0775, A06A0776. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 11, 2006. *164 Jennifer B. Dempsey, Christopher P. Galanek, Powell & Goldstein LLP, Atlanta, for Appellants. Joshua E. Kight, Kight, Baggett &

744 A.2d 1158 (2000) 162 N.J. 397 Sondra CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Penelope POWELL and John Doe, (fictitious name), Defendants, and Newark Police Department, Officer Foster Badgley, Sgt. John Cantalupo, Officer James Bircsak and Act. Lt. Richard Mandriota, Defendants-Respondents. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 9, 1999. Decided Jan

August 19, 2025 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FRANKLIN FOSTER (SC 20829) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ec

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

[Cite as State v. Powell, 2024-Ohio-4923.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30053 : v.

Appellate Case: 19-4042 Document: 010110764297 Date Filed: 11/07/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 7, 2022

[Cite as State v. Foster, 2023-Ohio-1434.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-22-26 v. TREMELL D. FOSTER, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-22-27

[Cite as State v. Foster, 2023-Ohio-746.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 21CA3967 : v. : : DECISION AND JUDGMENT DIANNA L. FOSTER, : ENTRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAURIE FRUGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02811 (CJN) BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Laurie Fruge claims that her former employer, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, unlaw

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

No. 122,048 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TONY LEE FOSTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The crowded docket exception in K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22-3402(e)(4)

On remand from the Supreme Court The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. In compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion of May 24, 2002, in Ex parte American Color Graphics,Inc., 838 So.2d 385 (Ala. 2002), the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with the Supreme Court's opi

[Cite as State v. Powell, 2019-Ohio-4345.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107276 v. : CARLIN POWELL, :

I. FACTS A. Guilt Phase Evidence 1. Prosecution evidence Tammy Epperson was a recovering heroin addict who had recently completed a 12-step treatment program and held a responsible job. Epperson lived on her own at Ballington Plaza, an apartment complex that accepted referrals from substance abuse recovery and in

STUMBO, Judge: Tony Powell, a/k/a Michael Foster, appeals a judgment of the Carlisle Circuit Court sentencing him to five years in prison and imposing a fine of $5,000 for possession of cocaine, and sentencing him to three months in prison for possession of marijuana, with said sentences to be served concurrently. After reviewing the record, we reverse. On March 29, 1990, the Carlisle County Sheriff’s Dep