Cases

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

THORNTON, J. This appeal involves an interpleader proceeding brought to resolve a dispute over who is entitled to an earnest money payment of $10,000 deposited in an abortive real estate transaction. The transaction involved a motel in Beaverton. The parties in the case are as follows: Plaintiff is a licensed real estate broker who represented the sellers in the transaction. Defendants are Blanche Miller, th

650 F.Supp.2d 124 (2009) Mary E. SHAFFER, Plaintiff, v. FOSTER-MILLER, INC., et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 08-30138-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 3, 2009. *125 Terrence A. Low, Law Office of Terrence, Springfield, MA, for Plaintiff. Courtney D. Cruz, Joseph M. Hamilton, Mirick, O'Connell, De

Funke, J. *569 Jeremy D. Foster appeals from the denial of postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Foster asserts that he was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal. We affirm the judgment below. I. BACKGROUND <

PER CURIAM. John Larson, III, appeals the bankruptcy appellate panel’s1 order, in which it affirmed the bankruptcy court’s2 order dismissing his adversary proceeding and denying him derivative standing. After careful review, see In re Racing Servs., Inc., 540 F.3d 892, 901 (8th Cir.2008), we reject Larson’s legal arguments and affirm the decision o

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Collins, J.), rendered December 19, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Braslow, J.), of those branches o

411 F.Supp.2d 10 (2006) STONE CRANBERRY CORP., Plaintiff v. FOSTER-MILLER, INC., Northrop, Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. and United States of America, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-11206-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 18, 2006. Steven J. Marullo, Law Office of Steven J. Marullo, Steven Rosenberg, Boston, MA, for Stone Cranberry

MILLER, Presiding Judge. Nedzad Jasarevic appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint against Dr. John Foster III and Dominion Orthopaedic Clinic, LLC (collectively, “the Defendants”). He contends, inter alia, that Dr. Foster committed libel by falsely accusing him of committing a crime and, therefore, the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the trial cou

Grosse, J. Actions under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, which incorporates, and makes applicable to seamen, the recovery provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, must be brought “within three years from the day the cause of action accrued.” 45 U.S.C. § 56; 46 U.S.C. § 763a. Compliance with the limitation provision is a condition precedent to recovery under the Jones Act/FELA. A claim for pe

993 P.2d 917 (1999) 98 Wash.App. 712 Creighton E. MILLER, Administrator of the Estate of William R. Blecker, deceased, Appellant, v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; Westinghouse Electric Corp.; General Electric Company; A.P. Green Refractories Co.; ACandS, Inc.; Alaska Steamship Company; American Mail Lines; American President Lines, Ltd.; Anchor Packing Co.; Armstrong W

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), rendered November 13, 2015, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. In the early morning hours of October 11, 2011, the defendant’s one-month-old so

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 92-2-24861-1, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered January 9, 1998. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Ellington and Appelwick, JJ. Now published at 98 Wn. App. 712.

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Lelanie Foster brings this action against May Lee, Ericka Rodriguez, and Lashpia Corporation (“Lashpia”), alleging copyright infringement. 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Defendants move for partial summary judgment on the issue of Foster’s entitlement to statutory damages, 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), and attorney’s fees and costs, 17 U.S.C.

686 So.2d 783 (1997) Karyn MILLER, a minor, By and Through her natural mother and legal guardian, Barbara MILLER, Appellant, v. Linda FOSTER, Appellee. No. 96-0245. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 22, 1997. Stuart F. Cohen of Wolfson, Diamond & Grossman, P.A., Miami, for appellant. Angelika Moncada and Henry J. Hunnefeld of C

318 F.Supp.2d 851 (2004) Grant MILLER, By and Through his Guardian ad Litem, Larry MILLER Plaintiff, v. SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendants. No. C 03-3383MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 24, 2004. *852 *853 Tania Lyn Whiteleather, Law Offices of Tani

Ray, Judge. After a jury trial, Omari Foster was convicted of one count of armed robbery. At the hearing on Foster’s motion for a new trial, the trial court found that although Foster’s counsel’s performance was deficient, Foster was not prejudiced by that performance. Foster appeals, contending that his counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate and call a witness, and that the trial court erred in finding that this

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated November 1, 2013, dismissing the petitioner’s administrative complaint upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent Legal Services of the Hudson Valley engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices against him, and a determination of the New York S

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _________________________ No. 94-1498 FOSTER-MILLER, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 99-1227 FOSTER-MILLER, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX CANADA, Defendant, Appellant, No. 99-1228 FOSTER-MILLER, INC. Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX CANADA,

725 S.E.2d 777 (2012) 314 Ga. App. 642 FOSTER v. The STATE. No. A11A2312. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 7, 2012. *778 Michael E. Garner, Columbus, Robert L. Wadkins, Robin H. King, for appellant. J. David Fowler, Smyrna, Gary D. Bergman, Joseph F. Burford, for appellee. DOYLE, Presiding