Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Foster v. Launch Technical Workforce Solutions LLC”
Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR NEW T
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU
Copano NGL Services, LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually and as Trustee for the John Ashcraft Family Trust 2012public domain
ACCEPTED 13-15-00342-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/5/2015 6:01:20 PM
Per Curiam: In 2014, cyberattackers breached multiple U.S. Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") databases and allegedly stole the sensitive personal information-including birth dates, Social Security numbers, addresses, and even fingerprint records-of a staggering number of past, present, and prospective government workers. All told, the data breaches affected more than twenty-one m
People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.public domain
Filed 10/22/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160701, A160706 v. (City & County of San Francisco UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-20-584402) Defendants and Appella
People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.public domain
Filed 11/20/20 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, A160701, A160706 Plaintiff and Respondent, (City & County of San Francisco v.
Desktop Metal, Inc. v. Nano Dimension LTDpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DESKTOP METAL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff and ) Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Consolidated ) C.A. No. 2024-1303-KSJM NANO DIMENSION LTD. and NANO ) US I, INC., )
Vectrus Services A/S v. United Statespublic domain
REDACTED OPINION In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-633C Filed: February 19, 2023 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: March 14, 20231 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * VECTRUS SERVICES A/S, * * P
Brian Beckcom v. Texas A&M Universitypublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00124-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/23/2025 8:33 AM Cause No. 15-25-00124-CV CHRI
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 18, 2022 Date Decided: April 27, 2022 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Christine M. Mackintosh, Esquire, Kelly L. Tucker, Esquire and Vivek Upadhya, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming
Johnson v. Tellabs, Inc.public domain
303 F.Supp.2d 941 (2004) Thomas JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. TELLABS, INC., Michael J. Birck, Richard C. Notebaert, Robert W. Pullen, Joan E. Ryan, Brian Jackman and John C. Kolher, Defendants. No. 02 C 4356. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 19, 2004. *944 Marvin Alan Miller, Jennifer Winter Spren
New York v. U.S. Dep't of Commercepublic domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: Table of Contents PROCEDURAL HISTORY.453 BACKGROUND.458 *450[[Image here]] *451[[Image here]]
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United Statespublic domain
Opinion And Order BLOCK, Judge. I. Introduction This case is one of the last of the Winstar-related progeny facing this court. It involves a series of contracts in which the government promised to allow the plaintiff, Anchor Savings Bank, FSB (“Anchor”) to account for “supervisory goodwill” as a capital asset that would count toward Anchor’s regulatory capital requirement and be amor
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
283 F.Supp.2d 66 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 25, 2003. *67 *68 *69
In Re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § No. 181, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 12711
Facebook, Inc. & Subsidiariespublic domain
United States Tax Court 164 T.C. No. 9 FACEBOOK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 21959-16. 1 Filed May 22, 2025. ————— O
Oak Mortgage Group, Inc. Michael H. Nasserfar Michael E. Task And Tycord R. Gosnay v. Ameripro Funding, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS