Cases

178 B.R. 767 (1994) In re Ervin STAGGS, Debtor. James FORRESTER, Rachel L. Forrester, Plaintiffs, v. Ervin STAGGS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 93-10443. Adv. No. 93-1088. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. June 6, 1994. *768 *769

177 B.R. 92 (1995) In the Matter of Ervin STAGGS. Ervin STAGGS, Defendant/Appellant, v. James FORRESTER, Plaintiff/Appellee. No. 1:94-CV-220. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. January 19, 1995. *93 Rebecca Harper, UAW-GM Legal Services Plan, Marion, IN, for Ervin Staggs. Michael Farrer, B

61 Md. App. 381 (1985) 486 A.2d 798 FRANKLIN B. STAGGS, ET AL v. BLUE CROSS OF MARYLAND, INC., ET AL. No. 538, September Term, 1984. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 14, 1985. Charles Lee Nutt, Baltimore (Clements & Nutt, Baltimore, on brief), for appellants. Harrison M. Robertson, Jr., Baltimore (Michael Esher Yaggy a

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank, 528 So.2d 759 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be paid by plaintiffs-appellants. AFFIRMED.

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank, 528 So.2d 759 (La.App.3rd Cir.1988), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be paid by plaintiffs-appellants. AFFIRMED.

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank, 528 So.2d 759 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be paid by plaintiffs-appellants. AFFIRMED.

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank, 528 So.2d 759 (La.App.3rd Cir.1988), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be paid by plaintiffs-appellants. AFFIRMED.

VITA C. CHENET * NO. 2022-CA-0666 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO., * ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVI

The Pittsburg Midway Coal Mining Company ("the Company") appeals from a judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court dismissing the Company's action against the Tuscaloosa County Special Tax Board ("the Tax Board") and Tuscaloosa County. We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History This appeal stems from an attempt to determine which of two counties — Fayette County or Tuscaloosa County — is entitled to the sales or use taxes on some of the equipme

YELVERTON, Judge.* For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette, 514 So.2d 198 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987) the judgment of the district court sustaining European American Bank’s exception of cumulation of actions is reversed. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings. All costs of this appeal to be paid by European American

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette, 514 So.2d 198 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987) the judgment of the district court sustaining European American Bank’s exception of cumulation of actions is reversed. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings. All costs of this appeal to be paid by European American Bank. REVE

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette, 514 So.2d 198 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987) the judgment of the district court sustaining European American Bank’s exception of cumulation of actions is reversed. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings. All costs of this appeal to be paid by European American Bank. R

289 B.R. 375 (2002) In the Matter of Jennifer Lynn HASBROOK, Debtor. Jennifer Lynn Hasbrook, Plaintiff, v. Citibank and Educational Credit Management Corp., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 95-32902 HCD, Adversary No. 02-3001. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. November 6, 2002. *376 William L. Hoehn

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette, 514 So.2d 198 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987) the judgment of the district court sustaining European American Bank’s exception of cumulation of actions is reversed. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings. All costs of this appeal to be paid by European American Bank. REVE

444 B.R. 887 (2010) In re Christopher Paul WHITE, Debtor. The National Bank of Indianapolis, Plaintiff v. Christopher Paul White, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-10289-AJM-7. Adversary No. 09-50511. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. December 27, 2010. *889 Edward R. Cardoza, Elliott D. Levin, R

YELVERTON, Judge. Combined Investments, Ltd., intervenor in the captioned case, appeals the denial of its rule for additional security under C.C.P. art. 3610. The plaintiffs answered the appeal and also filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and does not cause the appellant irreparable injury. Meanwhile, the preliminary injunction for which the appellant desired the additi

YELVERTON, Judge. Combined Investments, Ltd., intervenor in the captioned case, appeals the denial of its rule for additional security under C.C.P. art. 3610. The plaintiffs answered the appeal and also filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and does not cause the appellant irreparable injury. Meanwhile, the preliminary injunction for which the appellant desired the addition

YELVERTON, Judge. Combined Investments, Ltd., intervenor in the captioned case, appeals the denial of its rule for additional security under C.C.P. art. 3610. The plaintiffs answered the appeal and also filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and does not cause the appellant irreparable injury. Meanwhile, the preliminary injunction for which the appellant desired the additi

YELVERTON, Judge. Combined Investments, Ltd., intervenor in the captioned case, appeals the denial of its rule for additional security under C.C.P. art. 3610. The plaintiffs answered the appeal and also filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and does not cause the appellant irreparable injury. Meanwhile, the preliminary injunction for which the appellant desired the addition

YELVERTON, Judge. Combined Investments, Ltd., intervenor in the captioned case, appeals the denial of its rule for additional security under C.C.P. art. 3610. The plaintiffs answered the appeal and also filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and does not cause the appellant irreparable injury. Meanwhile, the preliminary injunction for which the appellant desired the addition