Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Forman v. Epstein”
Forman v. Brownpublic domain
944 P.2d 559 (1996) Sue FORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark N. BROWN, d/b/a Brown's Royal Gorge Rafting, Brown's Fort and Greg Scott, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95CA1380. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. B. November 29, 1996. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1997. Certiorari Denied October 20, 1997. *560
Forman v. Whitney Ctr. for Permanent Cosmetics Corppublic domain
Forman v Whitney Ctr. for Permanent Cosmetics Corp (2019 NY Slip Op 03451) Forman v Whitney Ctr. for Permanent Cosmetics Corp 2019 NY Slip Op 03451 Decided on May 2, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published b
254 B.R. 104 (1999) In re HALPERT & COMPANY, INC., Debtor. Charles M. Forman, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey Matthews Financial Group, Llc, Alan P. Halpert, Matthew Cohen, Jeffrey A. Halpert & Linda Halpert, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 97-22977 (RG). Adversary No. 98-2230. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. February 25, 1999.
United States v. Epsteinpublic domain
27 F.Supp.2d 404 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDermott, Christopher H. Martin, Jesse Siegel a/k/a Jessie Siegel, Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, Ron Soffer, and Carmen Tausik, Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 8307(DC).
B. Forman Co. v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION Imputation of Interest Income Under Section 4-8B Each, petitioner owns and operates a department store in downtown Rochester, N.Y. In 1958, petitioners organized Midtown Holdings Gorp. as a vehicle for constructing and operating an enclosed-mall shopping center abutting upon their department stores. It was hoped that the shopping center would not only revitalize their busine
B. Forman Co. v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION Imputation of Interest Income Under Section 4-8B Each, petitioner owns and operates a department store in downtown Rochester, N.Y. In 1958, petitioners organized Midtown Holdings Gorp. as a vehicle for constructing and operating an enclosed-mall shopping center abutting upon their department stores. It was hoped that the shopping center would not only revitalize their busine
KUNZIG, Judge. This action seeking compensation for damages suffered as a result of a limited partnership land development scheme gone awry comes to us on plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment entered on a general jury verdict ' for defendants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Wyly, J. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment rejecting her demand against the defendants for five thousand dollars on a policy of insurance taken out on the life of her husband, Lewis Epstein, on the second of July, 1872, the assured having died on the twentieth of January, 1873. The defense is, the policy was void, because the assured failed to comply with a condition precedent. The insurance was for a sum equal to one dollar
Cullom v. Epsteinpublic domain
His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX, rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows: A motion has been made in this Court to dismiss the appeal taken by Charles Epstein, defendant, and there accompanies said motion the certified proceedings and a judgment of the trial Court, rendered since the filing of the transcript in this Court, dismissing said appeal on the ground that the surety on the ¡appeal bond was no
Harris Realty Co. v. Epsteinpublic domain
Rugg, C.J. The plaintiff by this suit seeks to compel the defendants to discharge a mortgage in which each has an interest on a parcel of land now owned by the plaintiff. The case was referred to a master. No exceptions were taken to his report and it has been confirmed. The facts as found by him must be accepted as true. The parcel of land, at the time of its purchase by the plaintiff and at present, is subject to a first mortg
McCabe v. Medexpublic domain
786 A.2d 57 (2001) 141 Md. App. 558 Timothy J. McCABE, v. MEDEX. No. 80, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 4, 2001. *59 Jeffrey L. Forman (Bruce E. Kauffman and Kauffman and Forman, P.A., on the brief,) Towson, for appellant. Jeffrey Pritzker (Jody Maier and Margolis,
Medex v. McCabepublic domain
811 A.2d 297 (2002) 372 Md. 28 MEDEX v. Timothy J. McCABE. No. 2, Sept. Term, 2002. Court of Appeals of Maryland. November 14, 2002. *300 Jody Maier (Jeffrey Pritzker of Margolis, Pritzker & Epstein, P.A., on brief), Towson, for petitioner/cross-respondent. Jeffrey L. Forman (Bruce E. Kauffman o
P.N. v. Grecopublic domain
282 F.Supp.2d 221 (2003) P.N. and G.N., individually and on behalf of their minor son, J.N., Plaintiffs, v. Daniel GRECO, The Windsor School, Ridgewood Board of Education, John Campion, the New Jersey Department of Education, and David Hespe, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education, Defendants, and Daniel Greco, The Windsor School, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Federal Insurance Company, The Chubb Corporation and Chubb Gro
Britton v. Bayer Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not
Britton v. Bayer Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not
363 B.R. 399 (2007) In re KARA HOMES, INC., et al., Debtors. Kara Homes Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. National City Bank, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-19626 (MBK), Adversary No. 06-03101 (MBK). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. March 12, 2007. *400 David L. Bruck, Esquire, Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, et al. W
Case: 23-2110 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee COKE MORGAN STEWART, ACTING UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE U
MCA, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.public domain
785 A.2d 625 (2001) In re MCA, INC., Shareholder Litigation, Lawrence Epstein and John Linder, Petitioners Below, Appellants, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Matsushita Holding Corp., MCA, Inc., Lew W. Wasserman, Thomas V. Jones, Robert S. Strauss, Thomas Wertheimer, Howard H. Baker, Jr., Thomas P. Pollack, Felix G. Rohatyn, Sidney J. Sheinberg, Howard P. Allen, Mary Gardiner Jones, and Charles S. Paul, Defendants Below, Appellees, a
Fisch v. Davidsonpublic domain
Fisch v Davidson (2022 NY Slip Op 01442) Fisch v Davidson 2022 NY Slip Op 01442 Decided on March 9, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Lasalle, J. Published by New York Stat
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta