Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Forde v. Gilbertie”
Simko v. Bob Smith Ford, Inc.public domain
FINKELHOR, J., — The above matter comes before the court on the preliminary objections of additional defendants to joinder as contrary to the provisions of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. §1301.101 et seq. Plaintiff filed her complaint in trespass on August 14, 1977, to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an auto
Vuyyuru v. Reddypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOKESH VUYYURU, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1453 (TJK) Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff sued under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organi- zations Act against ten named and five anonym
Ford v. Fordpublic domain
GARRISON, Judge. On May 30, 1985, Mary Key Ford was granted a divorce from her husband, Samuel B. Ford. The trial judge found Samuel Ford to be at fault and ordered him to pay Mary Ford permanent alimony of $200 every month. Samuel Ford now appeals the trial judge’s finding of fault on his part and urges that Mary Ford should not be entitled to alimony payments due to her own fault in the dissolution of this marriage.
Stern v. Cosbypublic domain
645 F.Supp.2d 258 (2009) Howard K. STERN, Plaintiff, v. Rita COSBY, Hachette Book Group USA, Inc. d/b/a Grand Central Publishing, and John or Jane Doe, Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 8536(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 12, 2009. Opinion Denying Reconsideration September 25, 2009. *263 Bryan Cav
MEMORANDUM. ERIC L. FRANK, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Murat K. Aslansan, the defendant herein (hereafter “the Debtor”), filed this chapter 13 bankruptcy case on March 27, 2012. Plaintiff Commercial Properties, LLC (“the Plaintiff’) filed a complaint (“the *678Complaint”), commencing the above adversary proceeding on January 17
McCorvey v. McCorveypublic domain
922 So.2d 694 (2006) Shaunn Caillier McCORVEY v. Derriel Carlton McCORVEY. No. 05-889. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 1, 2006. *695 Alex L. Andrus, III, Guglielmo, Lopez, Tuttle, Hunter & Jarrell, LLP., Opelousas, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Shaunn Caillier McCorvey. Glenn James Labbe, Lafayette,
Hebert v. Hebertpublic domain
BOUTALL, Judge. Barbara Ditcharo Hebert sued Emile K. Hebert for a separation from bed and board on the grounds of mental cruelty and later amended her petition to alternatively ask for a divorce on the grounds of post-separation adultery. The trial court granted her a divorce, finding that her husband had com*967mitted adultery and was at fault for the separation,
United States v. Savelypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. On March 9, 1989, the jury found the defendant, Virgil Wayne Savely, guilty of five counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and two counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341.1 Prior to sentencing, the defendant filed a written response (Dk. 53) disputing, inter alia, that portion of the pre-sen
United States v. Paynepublic domain
894 F.Supp. 534 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Leonard M. PAYNE. Civ. A. No. 90-10229-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 20, 1995. *535 Owen S. Walker, Federal Defender Office, Boston, MA, for Leonard M. Payne. Despena F. Billings, U.S. Atty's Office, Boston, MA, for U.S.
20 F.3d 771 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8541 VICOM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.HARBRIDGE MERCHANT SERVICES, INC., as Successor in Interestto Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot,James Elliot, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-1328, 93-1329. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 28, 1993.Decided A
Claim of D'Angelo v. Loft Candy Corp.public domain
Sweeney, J. Appeal by the employer and insurance carrier from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 8, 1968 and March 6, 1969. Claimant worked for Loft Candy Corporation as a machine operator from August, 1954 to November, 1967. All during this period she performed the same duties. She was required to pick up boxes weighing on an *1078average of 30
Tillery v. Owenspublic domain
719 F.Supp. 1256 (1989) Major TILLERY, Victor Hassine, Kenneth Davenport, William Grandison, Nelson Charles Mikesell, and Ellis W. Matthews, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. David OWENS, Jr., in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, George Petsock, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, and Arnold Snitzer, M.D., in his official capacity as a member