Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Fontenot v. Ada, City of”
Fontenot v. Crowpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 13, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert
Fontenot v. Statepublic domain
881 P.2d 69 (1994) Karl Allen FONTENOT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-88-571. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. June 8, 1994. Petition for Rehearing Denied and Mandate Ordered Issued September 30, 1994. George Butner, Wewoka, trial counsel for appellant. Cindy G. Brown, Asst. Appellate Indigent Defender, Norman, ap
Fontenot v. Statepublic domain
742 P.2d 31 (1987) Karl Allen FONTENOT, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-85-769. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. August 11, 1987. Terry J. Hull, Asst. Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant. Michael C. Turpen, Atty. Gen., M. Caroline Emerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee. *
ORDER Daniel P. Jordan III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Mississippi Code section 93-17-3(5) — which prohibits adoption by married gay couples— violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. They named as defendants the Mississippi Department of Human Services (“DHS”), DHS’s Executive Director, three chancery courts, nine chancellor
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Randy Crane, United States District Judge Now before the Court is Defendant Care Improvement Plus of Texas Insurance Company’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No 49). Having considered the Motion and the responsive briefing, (Dkt.Nos. 51, 53), in light of the relevant law, and for the reasons articulated below, the Court is
Baumgardner v. County of Cookpublic domain
108 F.Supp.2d 1041 (2000) Robert BAUMGARDNER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF COOK and William Krystiniak, Defendants. No. 99 C 5788. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 3, 2000. *1042 Jonathan C. Goldman, Goldman & Ehrlich, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Katherine A. Paterno, Assistant State's A
402 F.3d 468 J.S., a minor, by his mother Sharon Duck, Plaintiff-Appellant, andSharon Duck, Plaintiff,v.ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; Michael W. McPherson, Superintendent of the Isle of Wight County Schools; Ted Durniak, Director, Special Education, Isle of Wight County Schools, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-2446. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT J.S., a minor, by his mother Sharon Duck, Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHARON DUCK, Plaintiff, v. No. 03-2446 ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; MICHAEL W. MCPHERSON, Superintendent of the Isle of Wight County Schools; TED DURNIAK, Director, Special Education, Isle of
Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Developmentpublic domain
645 So.2d 1134 (1994) Gracie BESSARD v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT. No. 94-C-0589. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 30, 1994. *1135 Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Gregory P. Touchet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for applicant. Elbert L. Guillory, Keitha A. Leonard, Julie A. Scheib, for respon
State v. Wilkinspublic domain
COOKS, Judge. |, FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Robert Daniel Wilkins (Defendant) killed Anthony Fontenot (Fontenot) on September 21, 2004. According to evidence presented and proffered at trial, Defendant and Fontenot formed a relationship as drug user and drug supplier from January 2004, to September 2004. Defendant allegedly began the relationship as a drug user supplied by Fontenot but gradually became
Peterson v. Grishampublic domain
594 F.3d 723 (2010) William N. PETERSON; Gary Rogers; Melvin R. Hett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John GRISHAM; Doubleday Dell Publishing Group; Random House, Inc.; Robert Mayer; Broadway Books; Dennis Fritz; Seven Locks Press, Inc.; Barry Scheck, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-7100. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 1, 2010.
State v. Bordelonpublic domain
GENOVESE, Judge. 11After having been indicted by a grand jury in Evangeline Parish on the charge of forcible rape, Defendant, Toby Shaun Bor-delon, was convicted of the responsive verdict of attempted forcible rape by a jury on June 15, 2005. On September 15, 2005, Defendant was sentenced to serve twenty years at hard labor. After his motion for reconsideration of the sentence was denied, Defendant appealed, alleging three a
Quick v. Vistacare, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge. On or about August 18, 2003, the defendant VistaCare, Inc. (“VistaCare”) hired the plaintiff Sharon Quick (“Quick”) as a registered nurse case manager. Plaintiffs Original Petition and Request for Disclosure (“Petition”) ¶ 6, attached to Defendant VistaCare, Inc.’s Notice of Removal (docket entry 1) as Exhibit A (docket entr
State v. Parkerpublic domain
991 So.2d 1091 (2008) STATE of Louisiana v. Phelix PARKER. No. 2007 KA 1224. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 6, 2008. Douglas Moreau, District Attorney, Cliff Wilkerson, Assistant District Attorney, Baton Rouge, Lousiana, for State of Louisiana. Kevin P. Monahan, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Defendant/Appellant, Phelix Parker. Before G
Weems v. Dallas Independent School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge Before the court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32), filed *723July 15, 2016; and Defendant’s Motion to Strike and Objections to Plaintiffs Summary Judgment Evidence (Doc. 39), filed August 19, 2016. After careful consideration of the motions, briefs, appen
Boggs v. Krum Indep. Sch. Dist. & Jeromy Harpolepublic domain
AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment *717[Dkt. # 41], which, after careful consideration, will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff Kelsey Boggs and r
Detgen ex rel. Detgen v. Janekpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge. Before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of the plaintiffs and the defendant (docket entries 37 and 39). For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motion is denied and the defendant’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background
Nunez v. Tribepublic domain
ANNIE MAE NUNEZ v. MICHAEL TRIBE, ET AL. No. 07-0424. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 31, 2007 NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. SUE FONTENOT, Attorney at Law, Attorney for Plaintiff/Appellant, Annie Mae Nunez. SUSAN A. DAIGLE, TONYA R. SMITH, Daigle, Jamison & Rayburn, L.L.C., Attorneys for Secondary Defendants/Appellants, Michael I. Tribe, E
Bennett v. Dallas Independent School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge. This employment discrimination action brought by a veteran returning from service in Afghanistan and Iraq requires that the court decide whether a reasonable jury could find in his favor on claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Uniformed Services Employment
Harris v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
389 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2005) Tony HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 04 CV 0409 L(WMC). United States District Court, S.D. California. September 27, 2005. *1245 Lynn Hubbard III, Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard III, Chico, CA, for Plaintiff. Charles A. Valente and Praveen Kosuri of Krasnow Saund