Cases

(2008) VOLKSWAGEN, AG and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. VOLKSWAGENTALK.COM, Defendant. No. 1:08cv819 (JCC). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Volkswagen, AG and Volkswagen Group

341 F.Supp.2d 734 (2004) AUDI AG AND VOLKSWAGON OF AMERICA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. Bob D'AMATO d/b/a Quatro Enthusiasts, Defendant. No. 04-70665. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 19, 2004. *735 *736 *737

640 F.Supp.2d 603 (2009) DELAWARE VALLEY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Delaware Valley Financial Group, LLC, DVFG Advisors, LLC., Michael Feinman, Howard Soloway, David Bleznak, and John does 1 through 20 similarly situated v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Princor Financial Services Corporation. Civil Action No. 08-CV-2590. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June

OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Plaintiff Denise Jarrett brings this proposed class action against Defendants Sa-nyo Manufacturing Corporation (Sanyo), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas, L.L.C. (collectively, Wal-Mart), alleging the Defendants designed, manufactured, distributed or sold defective 42" and 46" Sanyo plasma televisions.1

817 F.Supp.2d 214 (2011) Joseph VITI, Plaintiff, v. The GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 10 Civ. 2908 (CM)(MHD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 31, 2011. *217 Robert J. Bach, Law Office of Robert J. Bach, Esq., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Randi Faith Knepper, McElroy, Deutsch

877 F.Supp. 1114 (1995) CELEX GROUP, INC., an Illinois corporation, and Celebrating Excellence, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs/counterclaim-defendants, v. The EXECUTIVE GALLERY, INC., an Ohio corporation, Defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff. No. 94 C 1087. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 31, 1995.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 DeGidio v. West Group Corp., et al. No. 02-3739 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0019P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0019p.06 New York, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Anthony J. DeGidio, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Robert L. Raskopf, Jennifer

OPINION AND ORDER HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge: If ever there were a case where the Court hoped that the “parties [would just decide] to chill,” Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 908 (9th Cir.2002), this would be it. Indeed, it is an understatement to say that this case has been hotly contested, or that there is some animosity between the two business competitors involve

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION

782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01369-SCT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. AND ORTHO- McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. BRENDA FORTENBERRY, AS THE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PERSON OF LOUISE TAYLOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/27/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TIMOTHY W. PORTER PATRICK MALOUF JOHN TIMOTHY GIVENS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01369-SCT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. AND ORTHO- McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. BRENDA FORTENBERRY, AS THE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PERSON OF LOUISE TAYLOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/27/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TIMOTHY W. PORTER PATRICK MALOUF JOHN TIMOTHY GIVENS

617 F.Supp.2d 1051 (2009) CYTOSPORT, INC., Plaintiff, v. VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. S-08-2632 FCD/GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 6, 2009. Order Denying Motion for Stay May 22, 2009. *1059 Glenn W. Peterson, Millstone Peterson & Watts, LLP, Roseville, CA, Jed H. H

Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge. In earlier proceedings, the Court resolved the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granting Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 171.) The remaining claims involve trademark and trade dress dilution under federal and state law, as well as trademark and trade dress infringement under federal and st

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This case concerns the well-known, small plastic clips commonly used to close bags of items such as bread and fruit. The defendant, Kwik Lok Corporation (“Kwik Lok”), has been manufacturing and distributing these bag closures within the United States for many years, competing with other popular forms of bag closures such as twist ties. Countercl

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This matter arises out of a lawsuit between two companies that offer online video content via their respective websites. On June 12, 2008, Fancaster, Inc. (“Fan-caster”) filed a Complaint against the Comcast Corporation, Comcast Interactive Media, LLC, and Comcast Management, LLC (collectively referred to as “Com-cast”), asserting claims for trademark i

444 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2006) E.S.S. ENTERTAINMENT 2000, INC. dba the Playpen Plaintiff, v. ROCK STAR VIDEOS, INC.; Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc; Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. Defendants. No. CV 05-02966 MMM (JTLx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 28, 2006. *1013

355 F.3d 506 Anthony J. DeGIDIO, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.WEST GROUP CORPORATION; The Thomson Corporation; West Licensing Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-3739. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 5, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 14, 2004. Appeal from th

279 F.Supp.2d 624 (2003) AL C. RINALDI, INC., Music Unlimited, Inc., Chopin Piano & Organ, Inc. and Capitol Area Piano Company, LLC, t/a Jacobs Music Company v. BACH TO ROCK MUSIC SCHOOL, INC., t/a East Coast Piano Liquidators, Bach to Rock Music and East Coast Piano Liquidators No. CIV.A.00-5477. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 26, 2003.

78 F.Supp.2d 1066 (1999) PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. TERRI WELLES, INC., a California corporation, Steven Huntington, an individual, Terri Welles, an individual; Michael Mihalko, an individual; and PIPPI, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendant. No. 98-CV-0413-K(JFS). United States District Court, S.D. California. December 1, 1999.