Cases

OPINION NORRIS, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal arises out of an order entered by the superior court finding plaintiff/appellant Diane Flynn’s negligence claim time barred because her amended complaint did not “relate back” to her original complaint under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c). Because Flynn sued the wrong party, defendani/appellee Sarah Campbell’

FLYNN, J. Following the two devastating terrorist attacks on Washington and New York and a third thwarted by air passengers who died over Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, Congress enacted the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 (fund) as part of the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act

JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Petitioners Robert Flynn and Carl Miller (collectively 'Flynn”) appeal the Order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) defining the term “paid in full,” as used in the definition of “settled” workers’ compensation claims, for purposes of determining the retroa

DUNCAN, P. J. Plaintiff brought this action seeking to partition real property that she owns as a tenant in common with defendant, her sister. Defendant filed a counterclaim seeking to quiet-title to the property in herself. The trial court granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment on each claim, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel bars plaintiff from asserting any ownership interest in the property because,

960 A.2d 1097 (2008) 111 Conn.App. 724 Gordon L. JONES v. Linda C. JONES. No. 29354. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 21, 2008. Decided December 23, 2008. *1098 Leon M. Kaatz, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff). George W. Kramer, for the appellee (defendant).

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs. The record supports the determination by the Appellate Division that petitioners failed to sustain their burden of demonstrating that the conduct engaged in by respondent Flynn constituted fraud or that it resulted in an irregularity sufficient to declare the results of the June 17, 1985 meeting a nullity. Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons,

274 Kan. 473 (2002) 55 P.3d 324 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DANA LINN FLYNN, Appellant. No. 82,983. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed September 27, 2002. *476 Kurt P. Kerns, of Ariagno, Kerns, Mank & White, L.L.C., of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. <

In a proceeding, inter alia, to compel appellants to reconvene the meeting of the Executive Committee of the Westchester County Committee of the Conservative Party of New York State for the purpose of authorizing candidates for public office, and to declare that the authorizations granted to appellant candidates on June 17, 1985 are null and void, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), dated July 9

100 Argued and submitted March 1, 2019; decision of Court of Appeals reversed as to plaintiff’s first claim for relief and defendant’s equitable affirmative defenses and counterclaim for attorney fees, but otherwise affirmed; judgment of circuit court affirmed in part and reversed in part January 30, 2020 Rich JONES, Petitioner on Review, v. FOUR CORNERS RO

NADEAU, J. The petitioner, Kurk Flynn, is a Fire Fighter I employed by the department of the adjutant general (department), an agency of the State of New Hampshire. He appeals a decision of the personnel appeals board (board) upholding the department’s decision to adjust his seniority date for two days spent on involuntary disciplinary suspension. We reverse. The facts are undisputed. The petitioner was discipl

JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants Montana State Fund, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp., and certain “Common Fund Insurers” (collectively State Fund) appeal from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC). We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2 We res

RHODES RUSSELL, Presiding Judge. Michael W. Flynn, purported guardian and conservator (“guardian”), appeals from a judgment of the trial court denying his motion to reopen a guardianship and conserva-torship proceeding in order to tax his fees as costs against the relatives of Wilmot Harry Scott (“ward”) who had initiated the proceeding. We affirm in that the appointment of guardian was void as the court lacked jurisdiction

749 A.2d 174 (2000) 131 Md. App. 342 Lisa JACOBS & Sheila Jacobs, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Leo M. Jacobs v. Meade FLYNN, et al. No. 5893, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 25, 2000. Reconsideration Granted in Part, Denied in Part May 1, 2000. *1

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Jones and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award except for the modifications made herein. The Full Commission therefore affirms the Opinion and Award of the D

979 A.2d 522 (2009) 117 Conn.App. 211 David S. LaBOSSIERE v. Catherine A. JONES. Nos. 29259, 29460, 29865, 30190. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 18, 2009. Decided September 22, 2009. *525 Norma Pierce Arel, for the appellant (plaintiff). Steven H. St. Clair, with whom, o

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 780 Appellant Billie Flynn, a minor of fourteen years of age, appeals from an order of the Juvenile Court finding him delinquent and committing him to the Ohio Department of Youth Services for six months after he admitted to the charge of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11

947 A.2d 409 (2008) 108 Conn.App. 184 Carol DiCERTO v. Ronald N. JONES et al. No. 28623. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 26, 2008. Decided June 3, 2008. *410 Dennis J. Kokenos, for the appellant (named defendant). Leslie Byelas, Westport, with whom, on the brief, was Sh

966 A.2d 277 (2009) 113 Conn.App. 250 STATE of Connecticut v. Todd Lamar JONES. No. 28038. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 29, 2008. Decided March 24, 2009. *280 Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Adam E. Mattei, special

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0221p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ SANDRA KRAUSE, individually and as personal ┐ representative of the Estate of Matthew

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Danny James Cohea appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir