Cases

Case: 12-15738 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15738 ________________________ D.C.

Case: 19-11921 Date Filed: 08/31/2020 Page: 1 of 58 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 19-11921 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:17-cv-00214-MW-CAS CARL HOFFER, Individually and on

MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Section 8(c)(2)(A) of the National Voter Registration Act (the 90 Day Provision) requires states to “complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.” 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-6(c)(2)(A). This provision became the cente

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2024-1314 ____________ ADAM RICHARDSON, Petitioner, vs. SECRETARY, FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, et al., Respondents. October 10, 2024 COURIEL, J. Adam Richardson, as a citizen

*517 GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: Tampa General Hospital receives federal funds for serving patients who cannot pay for the healthcare they receive. To determine how much federal funding goes to each hospital for providing such care, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) make

CARNES, Chief Judge: Daniel Lugo, a Florida death-row inmate, appeals the district court’s decision dismissing as time-barred his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He also appeals the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, which asked the district court to vacate its judgment dismissing his § 2254 petition as time-barred. Lugo contended in the district court, as he does here, that

Case: 11-13439 Date Filed: 04/24/2014 Page: 1 of 53 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _______________________ Nos. 11-13439 & 12-13737 _______________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-20098-JAL DANIEL LUGO,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2020-3605 _____________________________ SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CORRECTED PAGE: pg 41 CENTER, INC., and UNIVERSITY CORRECTION IS OF FLORIDA BOARD OF UNDERLINED IN RED TRUSTEES, MAILED: December 12, 2024 BY: JE

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2020-3605 _____________________________ SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellants, v. JENNIFER CHAVEZ and MARLON CHAVEZ as Parents and Natural Guardians of G.C., a minor; and FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, Appellees.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES : CENTER, INC., d/b/a TAMPA : GENERAL HOSPITAL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 19-3487 (RC) : v.

USCA11 Case: 21-14098 Date Filed: 12/06/2021 Page: 1 of 94 [PUBLISH] CORRECTED In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14098-JJ ___________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DEPARTM

USCA11 Case: 21-14098 Date Filed: 12/06/2021 Page: 1 of 94 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14098-JJ ___________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SE

Case: 17-13595 Date Filed: 09/17/2019 Page: 1 of 66 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-13595 _______

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-776 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 9, 14 :

CANADY, C.J., dissenting. I dissent from the majority’s decision to prevent the people of Florida from voting on amendment 9, the Legislature’s duly proposed constitutional amendment related to healthcare services. In 2004, this Court considered a challenge to a constitutional amendment proposed by the Legislature similar to the challenge presented here. Amer. Civil Liberties Union of Fla.

WILLIAM F. JUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This action concerns a contractual dispute over insurance coverage. The matter comes to the Court on Plaintiff's motion to remand the case to Florida state court. Dkt. 5. Defendant has filed an opposition to the motion. Dkt. 12. The Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND According to the Complaint filed in the Circuit Court

Case: 12-14009 Date Filed: 12/14/2015 Page: 1 of 82 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 12-14009 _______________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22026-MGC DR. BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, DR. JUDITH SCHAECHTER, DR. TOMMY SCHECHTMAN, AMERIC

WILSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Majority has vacated its original opinion and replaced it with one that, unlike the original opinion, subjects Florida’s Firearm Owners’ Privacy Act (Act) to First Amendment scrutiny. While this is an encouraging development, the Majority believes the Act survives intermediate scrutiny. It does not. For this reason, I continue to dissent. I.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The Governor of the State of Florida, other Florida officials, and members of the Board of Medicine of the Florida Department of Health (collectively, the “State”), appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and an injunction in favor of a group of physicians and physician advocacy groups (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) enjoining enforcement of Florida’s Firearm Owners Privacy Act

PARIENTE, J. The important constitutional issue at the heart of this dispute is whether the records that patients in this State have a right to access under article X, section 26, of the Florida Constitution (“Amendment 7”), specifically records relating to “adverse medical incidents,” are privileged and confidential under the Federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (“the Federal Act”),1