Cases

856 A.2d 277 (2004) Larry MEGGETT, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs July 2, 2004. Decided August 11, 2004. *278 Larry Meggett, petitioner, pro se. Nicole L. Adams, Camp Hill, for respon

USCA11 Case: 22-13548 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 03/01/2024 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13548 ____________________ MICHAEL DAVID CARRUTH,

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL No. 08-16-00317-CV JUSTICE, § Appeal from Appellant, §

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 18-2297 and 18-2323 _____________ PENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION v. GOVERNOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (Intervenor in District Court)

OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge. We are called upon to decide whether, in enacting Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Congress abrogated the States’ Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity from suit pursuant to a valid exercise of its § 5 power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. In Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 631, 145 L.

524 U.S. 206 (1998) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL. v. YESKEY No. 97-634. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 28, 1998. Decided June 15, 1998. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. *207 Paul A.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE ROBERT J. BRYAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Dkt. 50. The court has reviewed the relevant documents, including plaintiffs objections (Dkt. 53) and the remaining record. On June 19, 2013, U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom issued a Report

MEMORANDUM YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge. The Court conducted a bench trial in the above captioned matter. The record is now closed, and the Court is prepared to render its judgment. This memorandum constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law made pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND <

Filed 9/15/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PATRICIA FLORES et al., D078501 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- 00049108-CU-PA-CTL) CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respond

645 F.Supp.2d 299 (2008) Kwasi Sekou MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Michael Winstead, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-4999 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 12, 2008. *303 Jerry L. Tanenbaum, Esq., John M. Armstrong, Esq., Tracey D.P. Overton, Esq., Schnader, Harrison, Segal &

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00028-CR ___________________________ AMADO FLORES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 371st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1531154D Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

180 P.3d 1257 (2008) Charles R. McNABB, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the state of Washington; Joseph D. Lehman, secretary of Department of Corrections, in his official capacity, Respondents. No. 77359-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 11, 2006. Decided April 10, 2008. *1259

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Florida prisoner Michael Griffin asks us to reconsider the single-judge order denying him a certificate of appealability (COA). He argues that jurists of reason could debate whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) and 60(b)(6) permit him to challenge the district court’s judgment denying his § 2254 petition by seeking a retroactive application

Filed 9/3/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G058486 v. (Super. Ct. No. 00NF1662) ALBERTO FLORES, OPINION Defendant and Appellan

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1603 SORAIDA FLORES, a Personal Representative of the Estate of ERICA FLORES, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH BEND and JUSTIN GORNY, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

300 B.R. 599 (2003) In re Pedro J. FLORES, Debtor. Pedro J. Flores, Plaintiff, v. Illinois Department of Public Health, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-11258, Adversary No. 02-1066. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. November 5, 2003. *600 Todd Taylor, Burlington, VT, for Debtor-Plaintiff. Val C. Simhauser, Assis

OPINION FARRIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Jose Flores, Ryan Reyes, and Brian Perez, three police officers of Latino descent (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), sued their employer and, after a nine-day jury trial, they won. The officers alleged that the City of Westminster (“the City” or “the Department”) as well as current and fo

"(~~ HIWill'li!~tkA"vl. ~- . ·•'liM¥ o · - II -1/IJR£: IlEA~AI/%· \ ~ ~' l . .· .. L.· ...

Stephens, J. ¶1 This case requires us to decide under what circumstances officers making a lawful arrest may seize a companion of the arrestee in the absence of reasonable suspicion to independently justify a Terry1 stop of the companion. We hold that where officers have an objective rationale predicated on safety concerns to seize a companion to secure the scene of the arrest, article I, section 7 of

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Wesley Spratt (“Spratt”) is a prisoner in the Adult Correctional Institution (“ACI”) in Rhode Island. After prison officials prohibited Spratt from preaching to his fellow inmates, he filed suit against the Rhode Island Department of Corrections and its director, A.T. Wall (collectively, *