Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Flores v. Morris”
Morris v. Florespublic domain
840 So.2d 1257 (2003) Bobby G. MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angela L. FLORES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Angela Lucinda Flores, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James McLamb, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 36,932-CA, 36,933-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. March 7, 2003. *1258 Downer, Hammond & W
Robert C. Morris v. Arica D. Florespublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00675-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROBERT C. MORRIS, Appellant, v. ARICA D. FLORES, ET AL., Appellees. On appeal from the 267th District Court
Flores v. Florespublic domain
WARNER, J. The former wife, Jennifer Flores, timely appeals an order denying her motion for rehearing or to amend a final judgment, claiming that the trial court erred in failing to retain jurisdiction in the final judgment to award attorney’s fees in connection with the former husband’s petition for change of child custody. Although the former wife requested attorney’s fees in the response to the husband’s petition and in her
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00470-CV Enrique Flores, Appellant v.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00470-CV Enrique Flores, Appellant v. Security State Bank & Trust and Billy Joe Morris, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-10-001396, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORA
Morris v. Florespublic domain
174 Ill. App.3d 504 (1988) 528 N.E.2d 1013 JOHN D. MORRIS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FRED FLORES et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 2-88-0121. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed September 12, 1988. *505 Timothy F. Kohn, of Edward G. Wells & Associates, of Palatine, for appe
Morris v. Brandenburgpublic domain
OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} Since at least 1963 it has been a crime in New Mexico to deliberately aid another in the taking of his or her own life. See NMSA 1978, § 30-2-4 (1963). Yet a physician who withdraws life-sustaining treatment from a patient, at the patient’s direction, and in compliance with the Uniform Heal
Flores v. Roepublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Gabriel Flores appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We affirm. We review the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition de novo. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a petitioner can obtain habeas relief only if (1) the state court’s decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application
Flores v. Rzeslawskipublic domain
MEMORANDUM * This case deals with the consolidated appeals of several district court orders. The first several orders found the State of Arizona in civil contempt of the district court’s previous order to reform the State’s English Language Learner (ELL) program, enjoined administration of the AIMS test to ELL students as a requirement for graduation until the program had been reformed, and provided for the
State v. Pena-Florespublic domain
965 A.2d 114 (2009) 198 N.J. 6 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Juan PENA-FLORES, a/k/a Juan C. PenaFlores, a/k/a Juan C. Flores, a/k/a Juan C. Pena and Fausto Parades, a/k/a Fausto Paredes, Defendants-Respondents. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles Fuller, Defendant-Respondent. A-129 September Term 20. Supreme Court of New Jersey.</
Flores v. A & Z Tobacco, LLCpublic domain
BILLY HOWARD EZELL, Judge. |, In this workers’ compensation appeal, A & Z Tobacco, LLC raises issues concerning an award of penalties and attorney fees for failure to pay a judgment within thirty days pursuant to La.R.S. 23:1201(G). Belinda Flores, the claimant, answered the appeal claiming that the award of penalties should have been greater and asking for additional attorney fees for work performed on appeal.
Flores v. Alvarezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Despite the number on the building, the location of the office to be searched was adequately described in the warrant. Thus, the district court properly dismissed the case as the complaint failed to allege with particularity that the defendant’s conduct violated clearly established law. See Burns-Toole v. Byrne, 11 F.3d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.1994). AFFIRME
Flores v. Arizonapublic domain
405 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2005) Miriam FLORES, individually and as parent of Miriam Flores, a minor child, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of ARIZONA, et al., Defendants. No. CV92-596TUC-RCC. United States District Court, D. Arizona. December 15, 2005. *1113 Eric J. Bistrow, Burch & Cracchiolo PA, Jeanne Marie Galvin, Lynne Christense
State v. Florespublic domain
ORDER Pablo Flores appeals from a conviction of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. He raises one point on appeal, claiming that the trial court erred in refusing to submit an instruction on the lesser-included offense of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating
Flores v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.public domain
188 Cal.App.4th 1055 (2010) 116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71 JESUS FLORES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B215105. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. September 28, 2010. *1059 Steven B. Stevens for Plaintiffs and A
Flores v. Bieluchpublic domain
PER CURIAM. We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus in part, and deny it in part. Although the civil commitment order allows petitioner to avoid incarceration by paying a purge, it fails to include a provision which would allow him to purge his contempt after incarceration by paying the purge amount. On remand, the order must be amended to include such a provision. See Ferrero v. Ferrero, 720 So.2d 320 (Fla.
Flores v. Arizonapublic domain
160 F.Supp.2d 1043 (2000) Miriam FLORES, individually and as a parent of Miriam Flores, a minor child, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. State of ARIZONA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 92-596 TUC ACM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. October 12, 2000. Lynne Christensen Adams, Roger William Hall, Office of Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for David Silva, Claudine Bates
Flores v. Aon Corp.public domain
2023 IL App (1st) 230140 No. 1-23-0140 Opinion filed September 29, 2023 FIFTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MARIA FLORES, DEANNA DUBE, MISTY
Flores v. Reagenpublic domain
TURNAGE, Judge. Mary Alice Flores appealed her dismissal by the Division of Family Services to the Personnel Advisory Board and, on failing to gain relief, appealed to the Administrative Hearing Commission. The Commission affirmed her dismissal. Flores contends the Director of the Division of Family Services did not have authority to fire her and that her termination was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Affirm
Doughty v. Morrispublic domain
871 P.2d 380 (1994) 117 N.M. 284 Sydney Morris DOUGHTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William W. MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 13256. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. February 2, 1994. *382 Charles E. Hawthorne, Hawthorne & Hawthorne, P.A., Ruidoso, for plaintiff-appellee. Mel B. O'Reilly, Law Office