⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Flora J. Littlejohn”

State v. Littlejohnpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2021-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 496 P.3d 726; 2021 UT App 73
2021 UT App 73 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. LANCE SCOTT LITTLEJOHN, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200224-CA Filed July 9, 2021 Seventh District Court, Price Department The Honorable George M. Harmond
Coleman v. Dunlappublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991-01-09 · Published · cited 4× · 402 S.E.2d 181; 303 S.C. 511; 1991 S.C. App. LEXIS 17
*512 Per Curiam: This case involves the validity of the will of Robert Wesley Coleman, Sr., who died in 1987 leaving under the terms of the will his properties to his widow Flora M. Coleman and one son William A. Coleman, III. The will left nothing to his children Claudia Coleman Dunlap, Deborah Coleman Marsh and Robert Wesley Coleman, Jr., who seek to have t
Welch v. Welchpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967-10-10 · Published · cited 4× · 157 S.E.2d 249; 250 S.C. 264; 1967 S.C. LEXIS 188
250 S.C. 264 (1967) 157 S.E.2d 249 Flora McKinney WELCH, Respondent, v. George H. WELCH, Appellant. 18712 Supreme Court of South Carolina. October 10, 1967. *265 *266 Messrs. William L. Thompson, S. Eugene Haley and J. Alex Neely, Jr., of Anderson, and
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 89 N.E.3d 622; 2018 Ohio 248; 151 Ohio St. 3d 1488
This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras
Ricks v. Fickenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 280 S.C. 294; 312 S.E.2d 715; 1984 S.C. LEXIS 224
Harwell, Justice; The trial court ordered specific performance of a contract between respondent T. A. Coats and appellant City of Myrtle Beach (City). We reverse. In February of 1981, the City entered into a license agreement with respondent Coats to permit Coats to conduct bingo *295games in the Myrtle Beach Convention Center. The City then notifi
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-06-04 · Published · cited 2× · 207 F. Supp. 2d 171; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10065; 2002 WL 1203855
207 F.Supp.2d 171 (2002) James IDA, Movant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. 00 Civ. 8544(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 4, 2002. *172 *173 *174 Michael Rosen, New York City, Flora Edwards, Sewaren, NJ, for Movant. <
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 259 S.C. 626; 193 S.E.2d 523; 1972 S.C. LEXIS 292
Brailsford, Justice: This action for divorce and child custody was referred to the Master for Charleston County, who recommended that the husband be awarded a divorce on the ground of desertion, that he be awarded custody of the couple’s adopted daughter, then about four years of age, and that the wife be denied alimony. The wife excepted to the custody recommendation only. Prior to leaving for Thailand in 1
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019-02-22 · Published · cited 45× · 916 F.3d 885
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. In this habeas corpus case, Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez challenges his Oklahoma conviction for first-degree murder and his accompanying sentence of death. The district court denied relief and denied a certificate of appealability (COA). We granted a COA, agreeing to hear a number of Cuesta-Rodriguez's claims. Exercising jurisdiction under
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015-12-03 · Published · cited 43× · 188 So. 3d 486; 2015 Miss. LEXIS 573; 2015 WL 7770771
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-KA-00501-SCT JAMES ROBERT ROWSEY a/k/a JAMES R. ROWSEY a/k/a JAMES ROWSEY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/28/2014 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KATHY KING JACKSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DAVID C. FUTCH JOSEPH W. GRIFFIN ROBERT J. KNOCHEL COURT FROM
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 22, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 255 S.C. 457; 179 S.E.2d 609; 1971 S.C. LEXIS 383
Lewis, Justice. This controversy between respondent, Elmwood Cemetery Association, and appellant, South Carolina Tax Commission, arises out of the attempt of appellant to require respondent to pay income tax to the State. From a ruling by the lower court holding that Elmwood was not subject to the tax, the Tax Commission has appealed. In 1966, the Tax Commission made an assessment against Elmwood fo
McKinnon v. Summerspublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953-11-27 · Published · cited 3× · 79 S.E.2d 146; 224 S.C. 331; 1953 S.C. LEXIS 102
224 S.C. 331 (1953) 79 S.E.2d 146 McKINNON v. SUMMERS. 16801 Supreme Court of South Carolina. November 27, 1953. *332 Mr. John Gregg McMaster, of Columbia, for Appellant. Messrs. James D. Walters and Walter F. Going, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent. Novembe