Cases

Case: 23-1700 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Appellee ______________________ 2023-1700 ______________________ Appeal from the Armed Services Board of C

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) FlightSafety International, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62659 ) Under Contract No. FA8621-15-D-6257 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Gale R. Monahan Esq. Dentons US LLP

In the United States Court of Federal Claims FLIGHTSAFETY DEFENSE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. Nos. 20-95C and 21-1725C (Filed November 18, 2024) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Phillip R. Seckman, Dentons US, LLP, Denver, CO, for plaintiffs. Stephanie A. Fleming, Civil Division, United States De

418 F.Supp.2d 103 (2005) FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC., Plaintiff, v. FLIGHT OPTIONS, LLC, Defendant. No. 05 CV 1811 ILG. United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 8, 2005. *104 Steven A. Berger, Kenneth J. Applebaum, Berger & Webb, LLP, New York, New York, for Plaintiff. Lauren J. Resnick, Josette M. Gri

106 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2000) William E. HALL, Plaintiff, v. FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-4026-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 11, 2000. *1172 *1173 *1174 *1175 William L. Fry,

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D REVISED APRIL 23, 2003 March 3, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Frazier Investments, Inc. d/b/a/ ) ASBCA No. 63001 Optimum Construction ) ) Under Contract No. FA2823-16-C-4036 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. John Frazier President A

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-843C (Filed: April 11, 2018) ************************************* ACME WORLDWIDE ENTERPRISES, * INC., * * RCFC 24; Intervention as a Matter of Plaintiff, * Right; Legally Protectable Interest;

109 F.Supp.2d 1332 (2000) Daniel S. RICHARDSON and Jamee L. Richardson, Plaintiffs, v. VALLEY ASPHALT, INC., a Utah corporation, Western Aggregates, Inc., a Utah corporation, and Does I-X, Defendants. No. 2:00CV378K. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. August 21, 2000. *1333 *133

PER CURIAM, concurring: We write separately to explain why we think that our circuit should reconsider the standard of review that we apply to summary judgments in FOIA cases. We generally review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment. “Summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are no genuine que

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, No. 13-17131 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-04376- EDL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge-EDWARDS. *458 EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: Alberto Ardila Olivares, the Petitioner before the court, is a foreign alien from Venezuela. In 2014, he applied to attend a Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”)certified flight sch

598 F.3d 169 (2010) Mark E. BATTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark W. EVERS, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-20724. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 24, 2010. *172 Kevin Watley, David James Batton (argued), Norman, OK, for Batton. Kenneth W.

21-1233 ACLU Immigrants’ Rts. Project v. ICE In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 21-1233 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS PROJECT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WP COMPANY LLC d/b/a THE WASHINGTON POST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1240 (JEB) U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1614 (JEB) U.S. SMALL BUSINESS A

ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge. Before the. Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) (together, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff, Malik Rahim (“Plaintiff’), opposes the motion.2. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in all

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RONALD M. YONEMOTO,  No. 10-15180 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  1:06-cv-00378-BMK DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellee. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

ORDER The court sua sponte recalls the mandate issued on October 12, 2011. The opinion filed on August 17, 2011, and reported at 648 F.3d 1049, is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. The court directs the Clerk to reissue the mandate forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: The Freedom of Info

648 F.3d 1049 (2011) Ronald M. YONEMOTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-15180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 15, 2011. Filed August 17, 2011. *1052 Peter Van Name Esser, of the Law Offices of Peter Van Name Esser, H

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This case is a highly contentious employment dispute. Plaintiff Curtis Klaassen, Ph.D., served as a tenured professor at the University of Kansas Medical Center ("KUMC") until KUMC fired him in 2014. Dr. Klaassen brings this lawsuit against KUMC and various current and former KUMC officials. He alleges that defendants retaliated against him because he criticized KUMC for financial mis