Cases

FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA June 23, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SAMUEL T. HOWELL, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner June 26, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0378 (BOR Appeal No. 2053443)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 Session JOE MURPHY, individually, d/b/a/ COOL FLAME LAMPS v. RESURGENCE FINANCIAL, LLC, Assignee of WELLS FARGO BANK Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County No. 07-CV72 Donald E. Parish, Judge No. W2008-00197-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 2, 200

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: August 1, 2022 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Flame & Wax, Inc. v.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge: Plaintiff Flame-Spray Industries Inc. (“Flame-Spray” or “plaintiff’) commenced this diversity action alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets as well as violations of the Lanham Act by defendants GTV Automotive GmbH (“GTV Automotive”), GTV GmbH & Co. KG (“GTV & Co.”), GTV-mbH (“GTV-mbH”), and GTV V

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge Before the court are cross motions-for partial summary judgment and a motion:to dismiss two antitrust counterclaims pleaded in the defendants’ amended answer. The motions for summary judgment primarily involve a contract formation dispute with an antecedent choice-of-law question. Finding that the United Nations Convention on Co

ORDER ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Freight Bulk Pte Ltd’s (“FBP”) Appeal to *756District Court of Memorandum Opinion and Order of Magistrate Judge Leonard. ECF No. 404. Because Judge Leonard’s ruling survives both de novo and clearly erroneous or contrary to law review, the Court

418 B.R. 548 (2009) In re PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC. Civil Action No. 09-mc-178. Bankruptcy No. 09-11204. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 10, 2009. *551 Anne Marie Aaronson, Lawrence G. McMichael, Dilworth Paxson LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Debtor. Andrew J. Flame, David F. Abernethy, Drinker Biddle &am;

MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Devon Robotics, LLC, Devon Health Services, and John A. Bennett, M.D.’s (“Devon”) Motion to Quash the Subpoenas Issued by ITOCHU International, Inc. (Doc. No. 268), and ITO-CHU’S Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 271). For the reasons below, the Motion to Quash is DENIED. An Order follows. I. BACKGROUND

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Covidien LP, formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP, filed this civil action against the defendants, Advanced Skeletal Innovations LLC and Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC, seeking declaratory relief. Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 4. Specifically, the plaintiff seeks a declara

NIBCO alleges that Viega has wielded its dominance in the carbon steel press fittings market to control the copper press fittings market. (Id. ¶ 71). NIBCO avers that Viega has made sale of its carbon steel press fittings contingent on the customer's agreement not to purchase copper press fittings from NIBCO. (See id. ¶ 72). NIBCO also avers that, in some instances, Viega charges penalties in the form of lost discounts or outright

411 F.Supp.2d 941 (2006) AMAKUA DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. H. TY WARNER, an individual; TY Inc., a Delaware Corporation; TY Warner Hotels & Resorts LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and JTL Capital LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, Defendants. No. 05 C 3082. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

OPINION & ORDER ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. These matters come before the Court on two of Freight Bulk PTE, Ltd.’s (“Defendant” or “FBP”) Motions. The first is its Motion, to Vacate, Motion to Dismiss Flame S.A.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Flame”) Amended Complaint, ECF No. 103, the second, FBP’s Motion to Vacate, Motion to Dismiss Glory Wealth Shipping Pte. Ltd.’s (“Glory Wealth”) Amended

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT Environmental Division 32 Cherry St, 2nd Floor, Suite 303, Burlington, VT 05401 802-951-1740 www.vermontjudiciary.org │ Blue Flame Gas Co. Inc. Site Plan │ & Conditional Use Application │ Docket No. 20-ENV-00011 │ Deci

Affirmed by-published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge HARRIS joined. *577 AGEE, Circuit Judge:- Industrial Carriers, Inc., (“ICI”), a defunct maritime shipping company, breached numerous contracts in the final months of its operation. Amon

*165 OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Vahan H. Gureghian, Danielle Gureghi-an, and Charter School Management, Inc. (collectively, the “CSMI Parties”) appeal from the judgment of the District Court affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision to deny the CSMI Parties’ requests

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered December 10, 2012, which granted the motion of defendants Worldlink International (Holding) Ltd. (Holding), Worldlink Tanker Ltd. (Tanker), Worldlink Energy Ltd. (Energy), World-link (HK) Resources Ltd. (HK), and Worldlink (Canada) Resources Ltd. (Canada) to dismiss the complaint based on forum non conveniens, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, wit

BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE If a portion of a credit bid ($7.5 million) is subtracted from a buyer's $45.7 million successful bid for the Debtors' assets when there are no other bidders, does it make a difference? The answer lies in an analysis of whether Counts I-V of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors' (the "Committee") adversary complaint (the "Complaint")3 against

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered December 10, 2012, which granted the motion of defendants Worldlink International (Holding) Ltd. (Holding), Worldlink Tanker Ltd. (Tanker), Worldlink Energy Ltd. (Energy), World-link (HK) Resources Ltd. (HK), and Worldlink (Canada) Resources Ltd. (Canada) to dismiss the complaint based on forum non conveniens, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, wit