Cases

*226 Opinion DUARTE, J. —Although the underlying litigation was apparently quite thorny, the issue presented by this appeal in a legal malpractice case is less complicated. Former counsel moved to withdraw from representing a client, alleging another attorney had agreed to handle—and

252 So.2d 488 (1971) Roy ROBERIE, Plaintiff and Appellee-Appellant, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants-Appellees. No. 3442. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. August 20, 1971. Rehearings Denied September 23, 1971. *490 Christovich & Kearney by A. R. Christovich, Jr., New

Reese, Judge. *708In this declaratory judgment action, Emily Howell appeals from the grant of partial summary judgment to Phillip Bates, as Trustee of the "Anne S. Florance Revocable Trust." Howell contends that the superior court erred in ruling that the estate of her aunt, Anne S. Florance (the "decedent"), was not a necessary party to this a

460 B.R. 222 (2011) In re INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION, etc., Debtor, U.S. Bank National Association, in its capacity as Trustee for the IBC Creditors Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SMF Energy Corporation, d/b/a Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., City of Alexandria, Louisiana, Defendants. BAP No. 11-6005. United States Bankruptcy App

[Cite as State v. Hipshire, 2011-Ohio-3863.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DARKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2010-CA-07 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 09-CR-71 v.

OPINION HOLLIS HORTON, Justice This case concerns whether an ex post facto violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights occurred due to the transfer of the defendant’s case from the juvenile court system to a district court where the defendant was tried as an adult. The appellant argues that an ex post facto violation occurred because he was tried as an adult for a crime he committed in 1998, when h

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐3425 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. ERNESTO GODINEZ, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Thompson, Justice. Appellants are former employees of appellee Elan Corporation1 (“Elan”), who sued their employer alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraud, defamation, and violations of laws penalizing whistleblowers. The complaint alleged that their employment was improperly terminated because they cooperated with an FDA inspection of Elan’s facilities, despite Elan’s express assur

8 Cal.4th 812 (1994) 884 P.2d 55 35 Cal. Rptr.2d 598 WILLET H. BROWN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOSEPH GREEN et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S034105. Supreme Court of California. November 23, 1994. *816 COUNSEL N. Mark Lam, Lawrence A. Agran, Moreno,

258 F.Supp.2d 864 (2003) Rufino PENA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN MEAT PACKING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 02 C 2763. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 24, 2003. *865 Thomas Howard Geoghegan, Jorge Sanchez, Despres Schwartz & Geoghegan, Chicago, IL, for Rufino Pena, German Alvarado, Rosa

914 A.2d 113 (2007) 396 Md. 405 AVENTIS PASTEUR, INC., et al. v. John SKEVOFILAX, Individually, etc., et al. No. 15, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 8, 2007. *115 Stephen E. Marshall (Paul F. Strain, Mitchell Y. Mirviss, David S. Gray, Venable LLP, Baltimore), for petitioners. <

LE SUEUR, Judge. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in his favor against Alva G. Dalon in the amount of $2,000.00, and which dismissed his claim against the other defendants. Alva G. Dalon answered this appeal but did not file a brief before nor appear at the time of submission of. the case. We will, therefore, consider the answer to plaintiff’s appeal abandoned by Mrs. Dal-on. This action arose from

399 So.2d 1297 (1981) Albert J. LAURO v. Dorothy Lucille Cappadora, Wife of Albert J. LAURO. No. 11977. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 2, 1981. *1298 Reed & Reed, Floyd J. Reed, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee. Archie C. Tatford, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant. Before REDMANN,

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: Peter Larm, M.D., and his wife Haruko Larm, appeal from their convictions for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1396h(a)(l) (false statements in an application for payments in a federally-approved plan for medical assistance). We conclude there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions, and that the district court did not otherwise err. We affirm. Dr. Larm is an allergist and was a

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Clark appeals from his conviction for perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and for making a false statement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Jeffery appeals from her conviction for perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction over this timely consolidated appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W

544 So.2d 802 (1989) James Robert STEELE v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 58343. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 26, 1989. *803 Boyce Holleman, Michael B. Holleman, Boyce Holleman, P.A., Gulfport, for appellant. Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by DeWitt Allred, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. Before DAN M. LEE,

757 F.Supp. 988 (1990) GOPHER OIL COMPANY, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Defendant. Civ. No. 4-88-16. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. October 12, 1990. Judgment Vacated November 23, 1990. Judgment Order November 20, 1990.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COBURN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned). In separate appeals, which we have consolidated, defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (OCF) and Owens-Illinois, Inc. (01) seek reversal of Law Division judgments, following a trial by jury, awarding plaintiffs Charles Kurak (plaintiff) and his *309wife, Prisc

185 S.E.2d 714 (1972) 13 N.C. App. 388 Phillip BARR v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. No. 7121SC531. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 12, 1972. *717 Wilson, Morrow & Boyles, by John F. Morrow, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, by Will

162 F.Supp.2d 1129 (2001) J. Keith IDEMA; Gary Scurka; Kathy Scurka; and Jim Morris, Plaintiffs, v. DREAMWORKS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV0010316ABC (RNBX). United States District Court, C.D. California, September 10, 2001. *1130 *1131 *1132 J. Keith